Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Syngenta AG

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1.  Syngenta is delighted to have the opportunity to submit evidence to the Committee on the subject of Private Sector Development.

  1.2.  Syngenta took the initiative during 2005 of launching the Going for Growth project—a collection of essays published by the Smith Institute, edited by Professor Calestous Juma of Harvard University—and sponsored by Syngenta.[64]

  1.3.  In publishing this collection of thought-provoking essays from a number of senior figures central to the development debate, Syngenta and Professor Juma aimed to take forward the excellent work of the Commission for Africa by exploring the key issues surrounding development and economic growth in Africa and recommending actions for governments, financial institutions and businesses alike.

  1.4.  Going for Growth places particular weight on the role of science, technology and innovation in advancing development in Africa. The role of the private sector is a central tenet of Syngenta's CEO Michael Pragnell's own contribution to the publication—which focuses on agriculture, business and development. Improving the productivity and performance of the agriculture and food sectors in Africa will be essential in any strategy aimed at sustaining growth and the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals.

  1.5.  This submission therefore draws on the issues raised in Going for Growth and seeks to look at steps the private sector can take to promote support for R&D and economic growth by finding new and innovative ways of working with governments and setting the highest standards in business, management and training, working both with multinationals and local businesses. We believe that there is a need for better partnerships between the public and business sectors, particularly in agriculture.

2.  BACKGROUND INFORMATION

  2.1.  Syngenta is a world leading agribusiness committed to sustainable agriculture through innovative research and technology. The company is a leader in crop protection and ranks third in the high-value commercial seeds market.

  2.2.  Syngenta's primary business areas are Crop Protection and Seeds. Crop Protection involves the production and sale of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides. Seeds comprise high value seeds, field crop seeds, vegetables and flower seeds, and these are developed for individual geographic regions to produce higher yields and greater reliability. Crop Protection represents approximately 85% of the company's sales and seeds constitute roughly 15% of overall sales (GM seeds equate to 17% of total Seeds sales—less than 3% of overall turnover).

  2.3.  In 2003-04, Syngenta's investment expenditure on research and development totalled $727 million worldwide, including $150 million in the UK, making it seventh in the top 10 foreign companies investing in UK R&D (DTI 2004 ranking).

  2.4.  Syngenta's goal is to be the leading provider of innovative solutions and brands to growers and to the food and feed chain.

3.  WHAT CAN THE PRIVATE SECTOR DO TO ALLEVIATE POVERTY?

  3.1.  Syngenta believes that the Commission for Africa's report was right to focus strongly on the role of business, trade and economic growth in its chapters on "Going for Growth and Poverty Reduction" and "More Trade and Fair Trade"; and that by highlighting the importance of business as an engine of economic change, the report effectively challenged governments, companies and organisations around the world to identify real and achievable solutions and strategies.

  3.2.  The Committee will be well versed in the broad arguments as to how a healthy business environment could contribute to alleviating poverty in developing countries. Syngenta's particular perspective on this issue focuses upon the role of the private sector in aiding and encouraging the transfer of knowledge, education and business skills from developed countries and companies. This needs to be done in a manner which leads to greater knowledge, investment and business development in Africa in order to achieve the following benefits:

    3.2.1.  Developing local businesses in the form of small and medium enterprises (SMEs);

    3.2.2.  The availability of quality, but affordable, goods and services;

    3.2.3.  Employment and job creation—and the promotion of broad-based economic and social    development as well as reinforced commitment to best practice in industrial relations;

    3.2.4.  A knock-on impact on the provision of social services as business works towards and encourages    improved housing, health facilities and public spending on those who need it most;

    3.2.5.  The development of an entrepreneurial spirit—as local employers develop their skills and    networks, they will develop their own companies and markets and healthy competition will    emerge;

    3.2.6.  The development and growth of indigenous knowledge resources—providing future generations    of teachers and business leaders.

  3.3.  All of these issues are particularly pertinent in the area of agriculture and food production/processing because agriculture is a crucial stepping stone to prosperity and sustainability. As successful examples in Kenya show, partnership between agribusiness companies, local farmers and entrepreneurs has built up a thriving horticultural industry, because even the smallest of inputs to local farmers can move quickly up the value chain into food production and marketing.

  3.4.  To take this forward more broadly a framework is needed. In Going for Growth, Syngenta proposed an "Enterprise for Africa" forum in which all stakeholders—companies, governments, donors, NGOs—could be brought together to focus on agriculture and food production as a means of development and building businesses.

  3.5.  A similar template could be used in other sectors, and we are delighted that as Syngenta was working on Going for Growth, Business Action for Africa (BAA) was born out of the Commission for Africa's report. Syngenta is now working closely with BAA on the agricultural focus of their work and look forward to updating the Committee on the progress we make.

4.  WHAT ARE THE CONSTRAINTS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND HOW CAN THEY BE ADDRESSED?

  4.1.  The biggest constraint on the private sector in terms of taking forward business in developing countries is very often concern about political and economic instability and hence investment predictability, poor physical investment, weak institutions and a lack of trust. Companies are simply not able to take the substantial investment risks involved: SMEs find it hard to get up and running—this issue needs to be addressed by radical action from local governments, not only to alter negative perceptions, but to make fundamental changes to the social, economic, legal and regulatory structures of their countries as set out below.

Financial initiatives

  4.2.  Effective and transparent financial support is essential to encourage not only international investment, but also to foster national investment and the growth of new businesses locally. Essential indirect financial support needs to be provided by governments working through the following initiatives:

  4.3.  Improved investment laws which enable both a dynamic micro-finance sector and the provision of venture capital support for new start-ups;

  4.4.  Tax incentives for public/private partnerships, research institutions, private enterprises and business incubators;

  4.5.  Reform of land tenure laws in order to allow land to be used as collateral for credit;

  4.6.  Support for entrepreneurial projects formed around the research outputs of public institutions.

Legislative and regulatory environments

  4.7.  In addition to the financial resources set out above a sound and consistent legal and regulatory environment is also essential to reduce bureaucratic processes, support markets and maintain a stable infrastructure. By creating fair, transparent and predictable systems and the institutions to manage them, local businesses will have more opportunities to thrive and international companies will have more incentive to invest. Factors to be considered include:

    4.7.1.  Globally aligned legal standards,

    4.7.2.  Intellectual property rights,

    4.7.3.  Anti-corruption laws,

    4.7.4.  Incentives for international firms,

    4.7.5.  All of the above need to be strictly supported and upheld.

  4.8.  Working within such a framework will enable businesses and legal systems to develop a sense of mutual respect, but it is also essential that the public sector is simultaneously strengthened in order to ward against the persistent problems of corruption.

  4.9.  In Going for Growth, Syngenta cited an example of its work in Burkina Faso in this context and it demonstrates aptly how private companies can work with governments to strengthen their regulatory structure. Syngenta assisted the Burkina Faso authorities with drawing up and putting in place regulation for field trials of new seeds and provided support and training for the regulatory team who were able to maintain the legislative framework and monitoring the trials.

Encouraging SME growth

  4.10.  Up to 90% of businesses worldwide are SMEs, which are responsible for creating the great majority of new jobs. Therefore it is essential that the development of this sector—as well as investment by multinationals—is encouraged, especially in the spheres of science and technology and the delivery of benefits to farmers and consumers. This is because small technology start-ups in developing countries offer a huge opportunity for entrepreneurship and employment and have knock-on effects as drivers of structural change and economic growth.

  4.11.  To encourage such entrepreneurship, budding businessmen need incentives and support. Current challenges include limited local demand, financial problems such as lack of credit, a lack of business/management support (as well as a lack of a skilled workforce), and problems accessing information such as market intelligence and intellectual property rights. Then of course there are also regulatory and market barriers and inconsistent government policies, together with corruption issues, as set out above.

  4.12.  In order to address these issues, Governments, donors and companies need to consider remedies for the market failures that affected previous attempts at entrepreneurship and institute measures that promote the use of intellectual capital, for example:

    4.12.1.  Promoting business and technology incubators and business parks;

    4.12.2.  Creating production networks and providing access to skills, educated labour and business     services and fair markets;

    4.12.3.  Develop special economic zones in which firms can import goods duty free if they are also     obliged to export.

    4.12.4.  Improve physical and institutional infrastructure.

Encouraging science, technology and innovation

  4.13.  Availability of funding for science and technology is an increasingly global concern. The dramatic reduction in public sector funding for R&D means that the role of the private sector is more important than ever. By way of example, as the largest global investor in agricultural research, Syngenta invests around £450 million in R&D each year. Inevitably though, much of this must be targeted at the major existing markets where it will be possible to recoup the investment and R&D costs.

  4.14.  Therefore it is essential that development strategies factor in policy measures to promote and endorse R&D innovation. Key issues that need to be considered include:

    4.14.1.  Better co-ordination between education systems and institutions;

    4.14.2.  The role of existing R&D institutions and options to establish new ones—and of course their     funding;

    4.14.3.  Effective public-private co-operation on research programmes;

    4.14.4.  Technology diffusion programmes and mechanisms;

    4.14.5.  Encouragement of private investment.

5.  HOW IS THE PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGING IN DEVELOPMENT?

  5.1.  Joint ventures are one of the key ways in which Syngenta has worked in developing countries. A good example is a joint seeds venture in southern Africa where Syngenta brought the technology and offered its partner, a Zimbabwean seed company, the scope to widen the market for its products. This was a synergistic collaboration where the partner company benefited from the support and guidance provided; Syngenta also gained through access to a new market and seed varieties it had previously lacked.

  5.2.  Such partnerships are, however, limited and often fail because a lack of capacity stops local businesses becoming valid partners for large companies, while funding or lending agencies who might support them are constrained by a lack of suitable financial partners domestically.

  5.3.  Syngenta has therefore tried a number of its own partnerships, experimenting with the partnership arrangements used in other countries, by, for example, bringing together Syngenta's distributors with the traders and financiers of the products produced. By integrating the production chain in this way farmers are able to receive pre-payment for their goods and thereby pay for the inputs to achieve increased productivity.

6.  CONCLUSION

  6.1.  In conclusion, Syngenta believes that agriculture in African countries is under-performing. It could and must play a greater role in growth, in the reduction of poverty and the eradication of hunger. This will mean reducing constraints and increasing incentives and opportunities for enterprise. It will need new and purposeful partnerships between the public sector, business and civil society. It will also require building trust and leadership.

  6.2.  We believe an initiative along the lines of an "Enterprise for Africa Forum" could help by identifying opportunities, building partnerships and trust, promoting good practice and by providing a new focus for solving these key problems. This would lead to real progress for all the major stakeholders involved.

March 2006





64   See http://www.smith_institute.org.uk/pdfs/Going_for_Growth.pdf Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 23 July 2006