Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by The De Beers Group

1.  BACKGROUND AND REASON FOR THE SUBMISSION

  1.1  The De Beers Group is the largest diamond producer in the world. We produce over 40% of global gem diamonds from our mines in South Africa, and in partnership with the governments of Botswana, Namibia and Tanzania. The De Beers Group's Diamond Trading Company (DTC) based in London sorts, values and currently sells around half of the world's annual supply of rough diamonds. As a company we employ around 22,000 employees in 19 countries, of whom roughly 17,000 are based in our southern African operations.

  1.2  De Beers welcomes this inquiry into Private Sector Development (PSD). As a private sector company we have extensive first hand experience of operating at the sharp end in developing countries. In Africa, one can witness first hand the transformative capabilities of the private sector. Countries like Botswana and Mozambique, which are experiencing high levels of growth, owe it not primarily to aid, but to a booming private sector which works alongside responsible and responsive governments. Indeed, South Africa could not have developed to its current position as the giant of Africa without the contribution made by private investors.

  1.3  Of course not all companies operate in the same way and there is much debate about what constitutes a "good company". On the one hand there are those who maintain that the primary objective of business is to maximise profits. On the other, there are those who insist that business must earn the right to profit from its activities. At De Beers, we don't see it in such extreme terms. We follow the maxim

    "The purpose of the Company is to make profits for its shareholders, but to do so in a way that makes a real and lasting contribution to the countries and communities in which it operates".

  1.4  We do not see our corporate social engagement as a philanthropic pursuit but rather as a business imperative. As a company, De Beers has proven that it is possible to maintain sound business principles whilst also making a lasting contribution to the communities within which we work. Through the development and deployment of sound policies in terms of employment and labour practices, health & safety, non-discrimination and environmental best practice, we believe that we stand to gain significant advantage in terms of reputation, recruitment and investment. When coupled with the impact of our core business activities, we feel we can make a real difference on the ground.

  1.5  However, at present there are constraints on the opportunities for private sector development. These constraints operate at all levels. Firstly, the issue of failed or failing states where governance is either non-existent or weak is a major deterrent to investing in an area. Companies committed to long term sustainable development cannot build their business in an area devoid of security and stability. We believe that not only human security should exist in these countries but security of tenure must also be enshrined in law. Once a critical mass in this area has been achieved business can begin to develop the medium to long term plans that are essential for scaled industrial development. Governments intent on developing their economies can only do so when sufficient funds are generated from a range of profitable businesses thus avoiding the dependence on aid. We believe that there is a role for donors in addressing the root causes of these problems, so that the benefits of private sector development can be achieved. On a more local level, the issue of HIV/AIDS continues to be a fundamental problem for the business community. HIV/AIDS places an unbearable strain on the health, education and welfare provision of even the most sophisticated countries in Africa. With HIV infection rates of one in four of the economically active population, this pandemic will destroy capacity and with it the potential economic growth which remains Africa's only real hope of poverty alleviation. The scale of this problem requires massive intervention by the donor community.

2.  OUR ENGAGEMENT IN POVERTY ALLEVIATION

  At De Beers we work directly with communities to assist in the fight against poverty by reinvesting profits generated back into these operations, thus creating and protecting jobs and the services that are needed to sustain them. We have a proactive programme to encourage local suppliers to our operations, with particular reference to local SME's where possible. We have been working in collaboration with many IGOs and NGOs in capacity building exercises helping to develop the necessary skills that will enable governments to accurately value their diamond exports. We have recently embarked on a new business initiative whereby many more of De Beers diamonds that we sell to our clients will be cut and polished in their country of origin, rather than exported to outside cutting centres, creating sustainable skills and businesses.

  2.1  At De Beers we have a large percentage of employees in sub-Saharan Africa and other business interests in many countries threatened by the next wave of HIV infection. For us, like most companies, tackling HIV/AIDS becomes a commercial consideration as well as one of concern for our employees. Currently our workplace programme takes a four-pronged approach:

    (a)  Saving Lives—our objective is to prevent new infections through communication and the mobilisation of employees towards changing behaviour patterns.

    (b)  Living with HIV/Aids—our objective is to provide treatment, care and support for employees who are infected with and affected by HIV, enabling them to continue a productive life.

    (c)  Minimising the economic impact of HIV/Aids—our objective is to develop an effective, integrated management control system that measures and records the economic impact of HIV/Aids on the organisation, enabling timely responses.

    (d)  Communications and stakeholder engagement—strongly underpinning the above, our objective here is to establish mutually beneficial relationships with key stakeholders in HIV/Aids management.—(See Appendix i).[83]

  2.2  We contribute substantially to the transfer of knowledge to local communities. We believe it is imperative to reflect the diversity of the communities in which we operate through our workforce. To this end we invest in training that will transfer skills and knowledge to the local population. As well as the transfer of skills, the host country benefits from money transfers to the surrounding community, not only through employment, but through purchasing policies that favour local communities and by stimulating small and medium enterprises, thus nurturing the entrepreneurial spirit essential to any country's economic well being; an attitude that we call, "a hand up, not a hand out". (See Appendix ii).[84]

  2.3  In addition to the clear benefits of engaging in local level projects, we would argue that for a company like De Beers the opportunity to effect long-lasting change lies at the macro-level. That is, through engagement with governments and international agencies, on specific issues, we have the ability to effect positive changes in the socio-economic landscape and thereby contribute towards the long-term goal of poverty alleviation. It is our view that this shift in knowledge and understanding is what will achieve long-lasting sustainable development. Throughout the past decade, De Beers has made a significant impact to the international mining regulatory environment which has clear implications for development. The next sections will explore both the formal and informal ways in which De Beers has been engaged in this process.

3.  OUR ENGAGEMENT IN DEVELOPMENT

3.1.1  The Kimberley Process

  The issue of conflict diamonds came to the fore in the late 1990s primarily focusing on Angola and later on Sierra Leone. In 2000, the international community became aware of the atrocities perpetrated in those countries which were fuelled by illicit diamond activities. The reason for our action on this was twofold. Firstly there was a moral imperative to do whatever was in our power to end these atrocities. Secondly from a commercial perspective, there was rightly consumer concern about the fear that their purchases could be used to fuel a bloody conflict.

  3.1.2  The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) came into effect in January 2003, following a convening meeting in South Africa in 2000. It is an official mechanism that controls the flow of rough diamonds to, and within international markets. The initial target was to stop the sale of diamonds controlled by rebel armies, but it also serves to reduce smuggled diamonds as well. Signatories are required to ensure that shipments of rough diamonds are free from conflict diamonds. Therefore, a Kimberley Process certificate must accompany all shipments of rough diamonds. Participants can only trade with other Participants who have met the minimum requirements of the certification scheme. The 45 participants of the process account for approximately 99.8% of global production of rough diamonds. In a remarkably short period of time, the Kimberley Process was able to articulate a system for managing and certifying the internal and international trade in rough diamonds. There is of course still work to be done. It has, however, been credited with huge increases in official diamond exports from Sierra Leone and the DRC, and with the ending of all official diamond trade with many countries accused of involvement in conflict diamonds.

  3.1.3  The Kimberley Process is an extremely good example of an effective cross-sectoral co-operation in action. The private sector was instrumental in eliciting change which could not have been achieved solely by governments and the donor community. De Beers was one of the front runners in orchestrating the Kimberly Process and in tandem with NGOs pressed governments to agree to its implementation. It is highly likely that had it not been for the actions of the diamond industry in crafting the provisions of the KP and uniting in common cause, diamonds would still be used to fuel conflict and destruction on a large scale.

3.2.1  Diamond Development Initiative (DDI)

  Controlling the trade in rough diamonds, however, covers only one aspect of the problems associated with diamonds. The Kimberley Process, which operates from the point of first export, has addressed the symptoms, but not the root causes. The difficulties begin at the mining stage, where a huge proportion of mining in alluvial producer countries is of an illicit nature. Even where it is legitimate, however, artisanal alluvial mining is problematic. Artisanal miners are largely unregulated and unregistered, and they operate in conditions that make them vulnerable to a variety of predators. In addition to poor remuneration, they work in conditions where health and safety are virtually absent. (See Appendix iii[85]).


  3.2.2  Like conflict diamonds, unregulated artisanal-mining can negatively impact on a host of issues pertaining to development. Unregulated diamonds that are smuggled across borders means that the government looses much needed revenue. Unregulated mining also has implications for human rights, labour rights and livelihood issues. As noted in the Accra document, we believe that in fragile and poor African countries where much artisinal mining prevails, these issues can best be approached through a concerted international effort. Regulation of this sort has the potential to supply major benefits for miners, the communities within which they work, governments and the diamond industry.

  3.2.3  The DDI is an attempt by international stakeholders to provide a multi-faceted framework that addresses issues of mismanagement in the artisanal-mining sector. It was launched in January 2005 by De Beers, Global Witness and Partnership Africa Canada (PAC) and the convening meeting was held in London in January 2005. A Plenary meeting was held in Accra in October 2005. The DDI calls for socially responsible corporate and government behaviour in the alluvial diamond-mining sector. Its intention is to encourage and develop cooperation between governments, NGOs, and business, on a policy level. The focus of the DDI will be the creation of a multilateral partnership framework that will allow interested parties to pool their resources, experience and knowledge, and to integrate various initiatives that are being developed in this field.

  3.2.4  The mission statement of the DDI notes that its purpose is "To gather all interested parties into a process that will address, in a comprehensive way, the political, social and economic challenges facing the artisanal diamond mining sector in order to optimize the beneficial development impact of artisanal diamond mining to miners and their communities within the countries in which the diamonds are mined."

  3.2.5  In the artisanal-mining sector, production is carried out using simple tools and equipment, with no safety regulations. Due to the informal nature of the work, living conditions are insecure and wages low and unpredictable thus perpetuating the cycles of poverty. Even though workers produce diamonds to the value of hundreds of millions of dollars each year, most subsist on less than a dollar a day. Within this environment there are also incidents for child labour to be exploited. As can be seen for the mission statement, the DDI could have a potentially large impact on poverty alleviation as it is attempting to directly engage in improving the living and working conditions of one million alluvial artisinal diamond diggers in Africa.

  3.2.6  Not only does the DDI address the working conditions of the alluvial miners, it also has the potential to address issues of peace and security. The wars in countries like Sierra Leone and Angola left artisinal miners derelict and destitute, thus it was no surprise to see people co-opted into violence and crime. Brining artisinal miners into the formal sector helps to eradicate some of the insecurities that lead to engagement in criminal activity.

4.  INFORMAL METHODS OF ENGAGEMENT

  4.1  The examples of the Kimberley Process and the DDI highlight the possibility of engaging in development through formalised processes at an international level. There are other ways in which the private sector can and does play a role in development projects. In a more informal context for example, De Beers has worked with the Government of Sierra Leone in post-conflict reconstruction. In a country where diamond revenues are the key to its growth potential, De Beers has transferred knowledge and expertise to the government in order to assist in the re-building of the country. For the last two years De Beers has been in constant contact with the Government of Sierra Leone with regard to assisting in post conflict reconstruction by capacity building of the Government Gold and Diamond Office in Freetown. De Beers employees have been to Freetown to help train government officials. (See Appendix 5) The officials have also visited the DTC London and Antwerp to further their technical ability. We are also a member of the Peace Diamond Alliance in Sierra Leone.

  4.2  We have also been working closely with the UK Department for International Development (DFID) in an advisory capacity. DFID have a contractor working with the Department of Mines advising on reform of the Mining and Fiscal laws. We continue to work with these initiatives in order to assist the government and the people of Sierra Leone in benefiting from their diamonds.

  4.3  It is important to stress that De Beers is not currently commercially active in Sierra Leone and has not been since 1985. Clearly, however, the future of this diamond producing country is of strategic importance to both us and to the diamond industry as a whole. We felt it was necessary to engage for reasons that are best described as "enlightened self-interest". Despite not being active in this country, we felt it was part of our wider responsibility to the diamond industry and its reputation to assist in providing the government of the country with sound advice on how to strengthen its capacity and make the most of its resources. This will help to ensure that Sierra Leone's diamond resources will have a major impact on the country's socio-economic development. From our perspective, a well developed, free, fair and properly regulated industry and market place secures the legitimate supply chain and provides consumers with the assurance that their diamond jewellery purchases are free of taint.

5.  RECOMMENDATIONS

  5.1  We propose that the donor community, governments, NGOs, academia and the private sector need to harmonise their efforts in order to strengthen outcomes. We need to align donor, government, NGO, academia and private sector actions and work together in partnership to gain maximum leverage. When it comes to the issues of development, despite genuine commitments to the ideals of poverty alleviation, the private sector cannot be expected to engage on a scale likely to make a difference, if these ideals cannot be reconciled with sound business sense. As the examples above have shown, the business community needs the assurance of stability for long-term sustainable growth. The private sector needs legislative framework and assistance from donor organisations. Donors can assist in helping to create an enabling environment by working closely with governments on their political and socio-economic programmes. Establishing the rule of law is essential to create the conditions in which companies will choose to operate, to generate good returns for shareholders as well as revenues and other benefits for the host communities. The research and intellectual capacity of our academic institutions could be more concentrated on providing practical and realistic solutions to the issues of sustainable development working in collaboration with industry, government and NGOs.

  5.2  We believe that development assistance must be prioritised and directed towards what can make the most difference particularly in the area of institution and capacity building and strengthening democracy. As our examples have shown, De Beers believes strongly in capacity building. We have placed our expertise and knowledge at the disposal of governments. We have been training officials from several countries in the appraisal and valuation of diamonds to allow them better to assess the proper revenues due, so critical for post-conflict reconstruction. There is only so much we can do. Business in general does not have the developmental skill sets that are embedded in donor agencies, IGO, NGOs and academia. There is a strong case to say that the co-ordination and pooling of knowledge will lead to better outcomes. Donor organisations and NGOs have much to gain from the experiences and knowledge held by the private sector and visa versa. It is the donor community, working with developing country governments that has the resources, both financial and human to co-ordinate and scale-up our combined efforts. There are many examples across the globe where many agencies and governments are following parallel paths on development thinking, possibly duplicating efforts and thus wasting valuable resources. The time has come to draw these parallels into focus and create a convergence zone where the thinkers and implementers gather in the same place and move forward together in a more aligned fashion.

  5.3  HIV/AIDS is a fundamental issue affecting interests in both the private and public sector and is an issue that could benefit immensely from better co-ordination with donors. Assisting African governments in the battle against the AIDS pandemic and other endemic diseases such as malaria and TB must play a central role in donor policy.

  5.4  Finally, the international community and civil society should continue to call for both companies and governments to sign up to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, (EITI) the UN Global Compact and the World Economic Forum's Partnering Against Corruption Initiative (PACI). Moreover, all stakeholders should begin to think of ways to strengthen and bind commitments to these initiatives so that they can be more effective.

  5.5  What permeates these examples is the belief that partnerships are the key to success. Alliances, or partnerships, are at the heart of De Beers' business philosophy. We believe that partnerships between governments, international institutions, business, academia and civil society are central to the success of post conflict reconstruction, conflict prevention and development in "weak government zones", De Beers has, seeks and aspires to partnerships in all it does.

February 2006





83   Not printed. Copy placed in the Library. Back

84   ibid Back

85   ibid Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 23 July 2006