Select Committee on International Development Sixth Report


5  The Peacebuilding Commission

147. Armed conflict, its threat, and the build-up of arms in many countries has set back development and progress towards the MDGs. If the international community is committed to the achievement of the MDGs the incidence of conflict in developing countries must be addressed directly.

148. The UN system has responded to this phenomenon and the need to address pressing humanitarian issues by launching a number of post-conflict missions known as peacebuilding or peace support operations.[148] The first such operation was in Namibia in 1989. In 2004 the UN Secretary General's High Level Panel proposed the creation of a Peacebuilding Commission and a Peacebuilding Support Office[149] to help states avoid collapse into war and to assist in their transition from war to peace.

149. The Peacebuilding Commission was formally endorsed by the World Summit in September 2005. Its remit is to:

i.  Propose integrated strategies for post-conflict peacebuilding and recovery;

ii.  Help to ensure predictable financing for early recovery activities and sustained financial investment over the medium-to longer-term;

iii.  Extend the period of attention by the international community to post-conflict recovery;

iv.  Develop best practices on issues that require extensive collaboration among political, military, humanitarian and development actors.[150]

Absent from the new Commission is a specific preventative mandate, and this lack has been much criticised, in particular by NGOs.[151]

150. The significant difference between the Peacebuilding Commission and previous peacebuilding efforts has been the attempt to move beyond the imposition and observance of a peace agreement and the monitoring of ceasefires toward a much more sustained post-conflict reconstruction effort. Reconstruction, when carried out properly, can provide important incentives for maintaining the peace. We discussed the Peacebuilding Commission in our earlier report on Darfur.[152]

151. The effectiveness of the Peacebuilding Commission will depend on how it interprets its mandate. Concerns have been raised with us that the problem with the Peacebuilding Commission is that the UN as a system operates on the basis of:

"government to government diplomacy, whereas peacebuilding is not about government to government peacebuilding, it is more about civil society engagement...there is a concern that it will not engage with local communities in the proper way and that needs to be thought about again."[153]

152. Saferworld are concerned that the Peacebuilding Commission should not simply be an office in New York but that it needs to "relate to both UN and donor bodies on the ground but also have an interaction with national authorities and civil society."[154] We agree. The peace which is being built should be one which grows out of the local situation and not one which is imposed by donors or simply reflects the government's interests. Mechanisms should be established to involve civil society so that grievances can be properly addressed in the work of the Peacebuilding Commission.

153. DFID argues that the Peacebuilding Commission's operations should be based on a shared plan between the government of the country it is operating in and the donor community, and that the Peacebuilding Commission must play a key role in reconstruction.[155] We agree that the operations of the Peacebuilding Commission should be based on a shared plan between the country in question and the donor community but we also consider that excluding civil society organisations runs the risk of downplaying grievances.

154. The forthcoming DFID policy on conflict due out later this year provides an ideal opportunity for DFID to consolidate its place among development agencies at the forefront of addressing conflict. A DFID conflict policy also has the potential to produce a more coherent, whole-of-government approach to conflict. This report sets out some of the key policy areas and considers ways in which a conflict policy can have a net positive effect on reducing the incidence and recurrence of conflict in developing countries. This in turn would vastly increase the prospects for achieving the Millennium Development Goals, especially in Africa. While the link between conflict and development is a relatively new field, it is an area to which the Government must give priority in order to improve development outcomes amongst the poorest. Preventing and ending conflicts and helping to ensure they do not recur will do more to create a climate for poverty reduction and development in the countries affected than any amount of costly aid programmes.


148   The UN had been involved in peacekeeping before this but this was on a much smaller scale and largely concerned with implementing a peace agreement.  Back

149   UN High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, A more secure world: our shared responsibility, New York: UN 2004 Back

150   www.un.org/peace/peacebuilding Back

151   Richard Ponzio, The creation and function of the UN Peacebuilding Commission, Saferworld, November 2005.  Back

152   Second Report from the International Development Committee, Session 2005-06, Darfur: The killing continues, HC 657 Back

153   Q 36 (Oli Brown, IISD) Back

154   Q 36 (Claire Hickson, Saferworld) Back

155   DFID, Making Governance work for the poor, p 50.  Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 25 October 2006