Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by ActionAid International

  ActionAid is an international rights-based development organisation working in 42 countries, a significant percentage of these are in conflict. The Head Office of ActionAid is in Johannesburg.

1.  How the UK can make its policies more conflict sensitive

  Countries emerging from conflict need more long term commitments to funding. Donors should move to process-oriented, rather than output or short term impact assessments to enhance work and enable longer term funding. Longer term bi-lateral funding requires development of stronger mutual accountability between donors and recipient governments over both the governmental and private sector. The UK government should develop mechanisms whereby longer term funding is possible.

  Conflict analysis is at the heart of any work in or on conflict. HMG UK has recognised this but needs a more bottom-up conflict analysis technique which channels local analysis into the national analysis and utilises local analytical facilitators. Policy-making should be subjected to more critical analysis from below.

  The UK should continue to encourage stronger donor coordination by developing regular international joint donor/diplomatic analysis meetings within conflict countries. These should be supported by similar ad hoc analysis meetings of donor home ministries.

2.  How the UK can improve its peace-building and post-conflict reconstruction policies

  Economic security is symbiotic with physical security and cannot wait until the latter is established. Economic regeneration should start as soon as violence begins to end. It should be used to promote local income generation and training, as well as develop community and social relationships—not contracted internationally, and ensure consultation and involvement of local communities.

  Disarmament requires psychological and economic change and should be viewed as a process not an event. Part of that process must be minimum economic security, training schemes must provide realistic possibilities of earning when they finish—not just a lump sum.

  Access to local markets and distribution networks is key to the provision of earning opportunities. The UK should prioritise, in collaboration with post conflict governments, the establishment of marketing linkages at local, regional and national levels. The UK should resist EU and other trade rules that inhibit post conflict countries from exporting their goods.

  The change from violence to politics requires that unarmed actors be an integral part of country planning at national and local levels. Civil Society must be included in planning and implementation of post conflict developments. Weakened by war, it will require moral support and resources. Publication of information in vernacular languages should be encouraged to aid transparency.

  Ending impunity is critical for increasing stability and security in a post conflict environment. The UK should develop criteria for the implementation of the UNCHR recommendations on ending impunity. Rule of Law can only be reinstated through an effective national police force accountable at local level and an independent justice system.

3.  Where the UK fits with a "global" peace-building effort

  The primary focus of intervention for the UK should be to support UN missions or regional bodies with universal legitimacy. The UN should be encouraged to develop better lesson learning from all its operations. Peacekeeping should focus on community policing and community security networks. In-country missions should ensure greater ownership by local people, including the poor. Inadequate funding has dogged UN missions, adversely affecting capacity and focus of missions. The UK should both fund and encourage greater funding for UN peacekeeping.

4.  How can the UK make its policies more conflict-sensitive?

A longer-term commitment

  1.  Currently long-term DFID funding is three or occasionally five years. Yet, the South African peace process, perhaps the most successful, took twelve years from initial contacts between the parties to the first implementation of the new constitution. Ten years after the constitution came into force, South Africa is still dealing with post conflict issues. Of course, accountability requirements preclude open-ended funding being given to organisations for periods of 10 or 12 years. However, a deeper understanding of developing processes and in principle commitments to following processes through over a longer period of time, with suitable reviews for accountability, allows development to become rooted in local communities and is thus more sustainable.

  2.  The current focus on outputs and immediate impact is inimical to successful conflict resolution, conflict transformation or even development in conflict. Resolving conflicts is not an event by event activity. Everything is a process—the negotiations, constitution-making, restoring the rule of law, disarmament, de-mobilisation, re-instating the infrastructure, economic revival, and reconciliation. Whilst milestones can, and should be identified, it should be clearly understood that they are part of a much longer process.

  3.  It is perhaps even more critical that the commitment to country level bilateral and multilateral support is not withdrawn or runs out because a country appears to reach a fragile post-conflict situation. It is at this moment that support should be strengthened to try to ensure that conflict countries do not fall back into war. So many have and it is even more difficult to move towards stability the second or third time when the population have become disillusioned even with peace processes. However, this must also be linked to mutual accountability and post conflict countries must either comply, or show realistic plans to move towards compliance, with legal and fiscal international standards and human rights norms, including transparency. The Government of the UK should encourage vigilance with regard to curbing unethical and criminal activities by private companies.

  4.  In January this year there is a donor conference in London on Afghanistan to decide upon the level of commitments over the next three to five years. At the time of writing, the outcome of that conference is not known. However, commentators are predicting a lessening of support. ActionAid Afghanistan have stated: "Without long term commitment the ability for Afghanistan to build a functioning democratic state will not be possible. Being hosts of this conference Britain can play a positive role". If the worst fears of colleagues in Afghanistan are realised, then the massive investment already made there is wasted.

Recommendations:

    —  That more long term commitments to funding in conflict countries is developed

    —  Process- oriented project and programme assessments should be encouraged

    —  That long-term bilateral and multi-lateral funding becomes the norm for conflict affected countries

    —  That the UK should encourage development of greater mutual accountability between donors and recipient governments in both the governmental and private sectors

Listen to the conflict experts

  5.  Conflict situations are highly sensitive, dynamic and often locally variable. The issues and parties may look very different in a provincial area than in the capital cities, in which the population are often more protected than other areas. Aid and development agencies need to have sharp and timely information about the issues at stake and develop a rolling analysis. The conflict analysis should illuminate the interests and agendas of all parties, armed groups and unarmed political parties, enabling both donor and diplomatic intervention to be appropriate and coordinated. In the absence of good conflict analysis, aid agencies, donors and diplomats can have little idea of the impact of any of their actions.

  6.  There are many tools of analysis and many good analysts. However, the real conflict experts are the conflict survivors. The local people not only know what their needs are, but also have an acute awareness of the political space available and the threats to that space. It is that awareness that has enabled their survival. Failure to take the local knowledge into account may result in inadvertently exacerbating the conflict. Whilst these local dynamics may seem unimportant at the macro level, if ignored, they can prolong violence or ignite a return to war and there are many examples of countries falling back into conflict that people have struggled so hard to leave behind. DFID is ahead of many other donors regarding analysis, for example the DFID Conflict Assessment Tools which have been adapted by other countries. However, there is too much dependency on the analysis of outside consultants and not enough on ensuring that there are channels through which poor people can enable their understanding of their own situation to be known. Furthermore, policymaking should be regularly critiqued through a comparison with local, provincial conflict assessments.

  7.  ActionAid have pioneered Participatory Vulnerability Analysis (PVA) whereby poor communities, with the help of local facilitators and outside experts, collectively articulate those factors contributing to their own vulnerable situations. They also identify what can be done about them—not what only others can do, but firstly what they, as a community, can achieve. This local level information can make a weighty contribution towards developing predictive national conflict analysis. The usefulness of analysis must be in its ability to be predictive. In addition, PVA begins to assist community rebuilding, and even reintegration in some cases, thus bolstering community conflict resistance.

Recommendations:

    —  Develop a more bottom-up conflict analysis technique.

    —  Initiate more training schemes to encourage local analytical facilitators.

    —  Critically examine policymaking from the perspective of local analysis.

Developing coherence between donors, diplomats and multi-lateral institutions

  8.  This requires, first and foremost, the development of a shared analysis between donors and diplomats. It is critically important that this should be based upon what the situation is on the ground, not a mediation of interests by foreign governments. It is only at the information sharing and analysis level that national interests can be ignored as they will always dominate policy-making. However, developing a shared analysis will promote greater understanding between diplomats and donors. Unfortunately, it is not only between foreign governments that coherence is needed. Diplomats and donors of the same country do not always work to the same agenda and the UK does need to ensure that the aid programme and diplomatic intervention are complimentary.

  9.  In Sri Lanka this issue has been given prominence by DFID. Post ceasefire challenges exposed the extent to which differences between different international actors were allowing the conflict parties increased leverage. DFID sponsored attempts at a shared analysis did meet with some limited success but rather too late to affect some of the earlier critical policymaking.

  10.  Several African conflicts might have benefited from this approach being taken at an early stage. Currently, in West Africa, the region is divided by Francophone and Anglophone approaches, yet is threatened with the development of regional guerrilla recruitment. The fragile peace that has been established in Liberia and Sierra Leone could well be threatened by spill-over from Cote D'Ivoire and Guinea. Joint regional analysis by the diplomats and donors of all countries involved could be beneficial.

Recommendations:

    —  The establishment of regular fora for international joint donor/diplomatic analysis in country.

    —  Establish similar fora on an ad hoc basis for home ministries to also develop sensitivities to a bottom up analysis.

5.  How can the UK improve its peace-building and post-conflict re-construction policies?

Economic development cannot wait for stability

  11.  Immediate post ceasefire, all attention is on the security situation and it is usually not until the security situation has been somewhat stabilised that economic regeneration begins. However, any delay in beginning to kick-start the economy threatens stability. Economic security and physical security are symbiotic. As long as food, water and basic needs are widely unmet then those with guns will be forced to use them and poor populations will be forced into serving the agendas of the gunmen. So, economic activity should start as soon as possible.

  12.  Even at these early stages there should be an emphasis upon regeneration of the local economy to stimulate independence and coherence of communities. Reconstruction offers many opportunities for the training and employment of the local population, but all too often the work is done under contract by foreigners and the goal is seen simply in terms of how much has been built. This happened in Liberia where the goal was seen as providing schools as soon as possible so that education could restart and a contractor undertook the work and completed the buildings. However, many of these schools were built in areas where the local population are in dire need of some income and training and so an opportunity to consolidate the peace process at a local level through economic underpinning was lost.

Recommendations:

    —  Promote economic regeneration at the earliest possible date.

    —  Ensure that local workers and local contractors are used—training them if necessary.

How regeneration occurs is as important as what occurs

  13.  To continue with the example from the previous paragraph: the schools were built to government specifications and government teachers will be hired. There has been no consultation with the local communities in this whole exercise. They do not feel ownership of these schools—though they are pleased to see them there.

  14.  Engaging local communities in such exercises is not a matter of political correctness. Communities coming together to discuss the rebuilding of their environment, sometimes to contribute their labour to that rebuilding, engages them in a peaceful activity. It helps to re-ignite community activities and may also be important in reconciliation. In addition, it can help break any dependencies that have arisen through reliance on humanitarian food aid etc.

Recommendation:

    —  Ensure that local communities are engaged with regeneration in their localities.

Reintergrating combatants into local economy

  15.  Disarmament may have already have taken place but it must be remembered that disarmament is a process not a one-off event. In African conflicts, where arms are abundant, it can be supposed that even after disarmament, which is a very delicate and sensitive process, some guns will be retained and hidden. But, the important thing is to take the guns out of peoples minds, not just their hands. To do that there has to be alternative ways of surviving.

  16.  Too many disarmament schemes rely on a one-off cash payment for a gun, followed by some training without thought of future employment and financial security. Furthermore, there tend to be many different uncoordinated projects offering training to ex-combatants.

  17.  In Freetown one can see young men walking around carrying joinery tools. They have received training in carpentry from a variety of organisations and all confidently went out as journeymen. Nowadays, if you want joinery done in Freetown, it will be done within hours and cost very, very little. Few of these carpenters are able to earn a living wage. They are disappointed, and with recruiting sergeants in town from Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea they are going to have to be very determined to avoid picking up a gun to earn again.

Recommendations:

    —  Disarmament requires psychological and economic change and should be viewed as a process.

    —  Ensure coordination of training projects and that there is a realistic chance of earning a living as a result of the training.

Re-establishing internal markets

  18.  Lack of internal markets is an acute problem in almost every conflict country within which ActionAid works. Liberia, Sierra Leone, DRC, Somaliland, Nepal and Afghanistan all report the frustrations of local entrepreneurs being unable to develop their businesses because of lack of proper marketing and distribution systems.

  19.  In Sierra Leone, an agricultural project involving ex-combatants harvested its first paddy harvest just before Christmas. That rice will be sold as seed rice to NGOs in the area who also have similar projects. One does not have to be a trained economist to predict market saturation within a year or so. The project leader is very interested in developing the scheme and he is enthusiastic to move into cash crops. But this ambition is currently frustrated by a lack of local markets. In an urban project in Sierra Leone, disabled people have been trained in blacksmithing. They have undertaken a series of commissioned projects and they have also manufactured several thousand agricultural hand tools. These excellently crafted tools are in storage as there is no demand for them in Freetown and no market linkages that would enable them to distribute them in the countryside where they are needed.

  20.  Similarly in Somaliland, with which the UK has a long relationship, the lack of markets for agricultural produce is a huge problem and the market for halal meat across Europe is increasing. However, EU protectionism obstructs the Somaliland access to this market. Meanwhile, in Somaliland, the value of livestock decreases and, as this is the major produce of the country, this can only result in excess grazing, environmental degradation and greater poverty.

Recommendations:

    —  The UK government should, in collaboration with post conflict governments, establish marketing linkages at local, regional and national levels.

    —  The UK should also resist EU and other trade rules that inhibits post conflict countries from exporting their goods.

    —  The UK government should not encourage directly, or through project funding, the manufacture or production of goods without ensuring that there is a market through which they can be distributed.

Who will shape the post-conflict environment?

  21.  Ceasefires are, by necessity, negotiated between armed forces. However, it should be remembered that ceasefires are a temporary lull in violence in order to create the space for a pacific political settlement. The temptation to move from a ceasefire to peace negotiations on the narrow basis of the relationships already established between the armed actors is often strong but extremely undesirable. The future social compact of a country should not, indeed cannot sustainably, be decided by armed actors alone. Similarly, in the post conflict environment it is important that the role of civil society, as an essential ingredient of democratic practise, should be recognised and honoured. Participation of communities at the local level is essential to bolster peaceful community development. At the urban level, it is civil society which takes over this function. Civil Society has a crucially important catalyst and watchdog role over the post conflict governance systems.

  22.  ActionAid has shown that participation is possible, even in difficult situations, in DRC, Nigeria and Sierra Leone. The organisation has developed REFLECT as a system of literacy and empowerment based on Frierian principles. In rural Liberia Action Aid has supplemented REFLECT circles with "peace circles". In urban areas, where there may be several organisations working and where at least nominal local government will be in place, REFLECT and peace circles are important components of civil society. However, in parts of rural Liberia where there is no government or governance, these community groups prove their empowerment potential to the full. They come together at the village level, make community decisions, and in some cases are able to articulate those demands to district level government. They are thus developing the rural-urban political links, acting as community advocacy, performing a civil society watchdog function on district level government and strengthening the rural community.

  23.  Civil society is a wide sector including print and electronic journalists and editors, academics and lawyers as well as community groups. All have an important role to play in post conflict development. The press, in particular, can make information available in vernacular languages to ensure maximum exposure.

Recommendations:

    —  Ensure the inclusion of civil society in planning and implementation of post conflict plans.

    —  Encourage the development of civil society through diplomatic insistence for political space for its operation and funding of its activities.

    —  Facilitate the publication and translation of plans and information concerning post conflict developments.

Establishing "Rule of Law"

  24.  The most important aspect of establishing "Rule of Law" is the ending of impunity. The population are entitled to expect that a ceasefire will mean that they can enjoy some physical security immediately. Only if they feel that will they believe that peace may be possible some time in the future and only if they see the possibility of that peace will there be active popular support for the process. People try to protect processes in which they believe.

  25.  The United Nations Office of the High Commission for Human Rights (UNCHR) has produced guidelines for the ending of impunity which provide a basis of international norms. The most immediate imperative to ending impunity is to ensure that criminal acts and human rights abuses are not allowed to continue and that perpetrators are apprehended and prosecuted. Internal security should be handed over to civilian police, under local democratic accountability, as soon as possible.

Recommendations:

    —  Develop criteria for the implementation of the UNCHR recommendations on ending impunity.

    —  Assist in funding and training the development of a national police force including fostering accountability practise at the local level.

    —  Encourage the adoption of a system for the independent appointment of judges. Fund the restoration of courts and, if necessary, provide training for judges and lawyers.

3.  Where does the UK fit in with a "global" peace-building effort?

Global peacekeeping should be through the UN or EU auspices

  26.  The current review of the UN has thrown questions regarding the effectiveness and accountability of UN across its range of activities. Whilst welcoming the review process and the creation of the Peace-building Commission, ActionAid supports the continued central role of the UN in peacemaking and peace-building, with support and cooperation with Regional bodies when appropriate. It is extremely important that peacekeeping missions have legitimate mandates which are recognised universally. Nevertheless, this is critical support as our partners experience of UN missions has been extremely variable and lesson learning regarding operational matters appears to be very slow.

  27.  A stronger focus on the policing aspects of missions, rather than the military, would also enhance the security of communities and poor people. Civilian policing, particularly if the personnel are trained in community policing, creates a more people-centred emphasis which augments the whole security arena. Project partners in Sierra Leone and Haiti have strongly made this point during PVA exercises. The objective must be trust-building with the public—not simply restraint of the public.

  28.  Under-funding of UN missions is a recurring problem. Under-funding not only limits the capacity of the mission, it can also distort the balance of a mission as funds are switched to cover deficits. For example, in Haiti, funds for disarmament ceased when MINUSTAH arrived, and since then the UN in Haiti have been struggling to deal with armed gangs in Port-au-Prince. As the date for the postponed election nears in Haiti and criticism of the operation mounts, it is worth looking at the problems that have beset this mission in more detail. The attached appendix was prepared by ActionAid Haitian staff. They believe that the UN response has been extremely inadequate and have made realistic recommendations as to how to improve the mission. Their recommendations also have utility in other situations, particularly those urging local ownership of processes.

  29.  Despite the problems outlined, ActionAid urges the UK to step up support to the UN and encourage the UN to increase their accountability to civil society in the mission countries. There are also success stories. The overall success is recorded in "The 2005 Human Security Report: War and Peace in the 21st Century", commissioned by five governments including UK (see www.humansecurityreport.info). This records a decline in conflicts and crises since the end of the cold war and credits the conflict resolution efforts spearheaded by the UN for this. There are also mission successes. The elections in Liberia were an inspiration for observers and provided a solid benchmark in the progress away from war for Liberians. In Sierra Leone, the handover to the national security forces as the final UN forces withdrew appeared to be a carefully calibrated success. The East Timor Missions, particularly the 1999 mission, were considered to be a huge success both internationally and within East Timor.

Recommendations:

    —  Peace keeping missions should be undertaken by the UN or by regional bodies which have universal legitimacy.

    —  The UN should be encouraged to develop better lesson learning from operations across the organisation.

    —  Peacekeeping should be focussed around community policing and community security networks.

    —  The UK should both fund and encourage greater funding from others for UN peacekeeping. In particular the UN should be encouraged to resist distortion of their activities purely due to funding limits.

    —  In country missions should ensure a greater ownership of the processes by local people, including poor communities.

January 2006

APPENDIX:  THE UN IN HAITI

1.  BACKGROUND

  The Haitian crisis is multidimensional with important social, economical and political components. Decades of social exclusion and political and economic failure have created a tense situation in Haiti's poorest and most vulnerable neighborhoods. In this context, political manipulation combined to drug trafficking has progressively increased the level of violence in slums. In the last decade, Port-au-Prince has been characterized by growing armed gang activities.

  Following the trouble surrounding the departure of President Aristide in March 2004, an international coalition force came to Haiti in order to ease the situation. This force was soon replaced by a United Nation mission (MINUSTAH) aiming to bring back stability to the country.

  Today, Haiti, specifically the capital Port-au-Prince is far from stability and security. It is important to look at some important facts related to this mission:

2.  MINUSTAH IN HAITI

    —  The Interim Cooperation Framework aimed at easing the economic crisis showed serious weaknesses in its architecture, transparency and participation. Few positive results have been registered.

    —  The military component of MINUSTAH is involved in some humanitarian operations that don't address the main problems of the poor.

    —  MINUSTAH and the government have launch a limited and weak social reinsertion program. There is no effective disarmament program being implemented across the country. MINUSTAH presence didn't actually lead to a reduction of weapons circulating around the country. As a result of this fact, the capital Port-au-Prince and some main cities are characterized by growing violence. In Port-au-Prince, high number of kidnapping, killings and vandalism are important signs showing the country is going deeper into chaos.

    —  The situation in Port-au-Prince is marked by the ambiguity noted in the position of MINUSTAH with regard to the armed gangs. According to the International Crisis Group, "a truce resulted from a dialogue between MINUSTAH and local Lavalas Party Leaders, who have decided to participate in the elections and requested and requested MINUSTAH/OAS to open registration sites in the center of Cite Soleil. Those party representatives apparently contacted gang leaders who agreed to halt attack on international and Haitian officials. Still, insecurity remains." High numbers of Haitian and foreign citizen are kidnapped or killed, sometimes in the presence of MINUSTAH's soldiers. Troubling testimonies from kidnapped people previously detained in Cite Soleil create doubts about the soldiers' behavior.

    —  The UN should be helping reinforce the Haitian National Police and the legal system. Some measures to "clean" and to increase the size of the National police (even though they're not enough) have been undertaken. However, the support to the legal system, improvement of the police equipment and the reinforcement of its intelligence are still missing.

    —  The election process controlled by the Organisation of American states (OAS) has not been appropriated by the Haitian Society. This fact added to permanent conflict between the Electoral Council's members has damaged the process.

3.  RECOMMENDATIONS

  The UN should use a holistic approach aimed at improving the economic conditions of the poor. Political adjustment programs that don't fit this goal must be questioned. Action Aid reiterates the recommendations it has advocated over the last eight months calling on the UN to:

    —  Launch an effective and immediate disarmament program;

    —  Work in partnership with civil society on security issues;

    —  Provide training and support programs for the Haitian National Police.

  ActionAid Haiti also recommends:

    —  A real participation of the civil society in the preparation and implementation of the national reconstruction plan;

    —  UN support for the reinforcement of civil society;

    —  The development of conflict resolution mechanisms;

    —  The implementation in the poor neighborhoods of human security programs which address the causes of insecurity and bring about short and long term solutions;

    —  A UN will to help reconstruct the country instead of a protectorate approach;

    —  Reinforcement of police intelligence;

    —  Meaningful participation of the population in an effective disarmament program.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 25 October 2006