Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons First Report


Introduction

1. It is in making, or giving effect to the law that Parliament impinges most directly on individuals, by conferring on them a wide range of rights and duties. [1] Individual citizens are also affected indirectly by legislation which confers powers or responsibilities on the Government. The prerogative powers of the Crown encompass matters of fundamental importance such as citizenship, foreign relations and defence. But they are in principle circumscribed, and comparatively few in number, in relation to the functions of the modern state. By contrast, Parliament's legislative powers are in principle boundless; in Blackstone's phrase, 'it can, in short, do everything that is not naturally impossible'.[2] Most of the edifice of government—the National Health Service, the social security system, the transport network, schools, public libraries and social housing—rests on statutory foundations. The question of how the public can be more closely involved in the legislative process has been a key feature of this inquiry.

2. An effective, democratic legislative process must be as open as possible. This means not only that the public should be able to observe every aspect of it, but that they should wherever possible have the opportunity to become involved as active participants. This is a fundamental point of democratic principle, but also a prudent strategy. Members of Parliament have no monopoly on wisdom; the Government has no monopoly on effective consultation. A system which allows the individual or organisation who has spotted a way in which a pending piece of legislation might affect them to bring this readily to the attention of the legislature is less likely to produce laws which are defective or redundant, or which lead to unintended (even unforeseen) consequences.

Connecting with the public

3. Although the question of involving the public in the legislative process runs through this Report, there are two connected recommendations about the way information is provided on the internet which are intended solely to benefit the public's understanding of bills and do not relate directly to our other recommendations for improving the legislative process.

4. The House of Commons Library currently maintains on the Parliamentary intranet a set of bill information pages, which provide links to the relevant Library publications, contact details for the relevant Library Researchers and a link to the Leader of the House's website, which also maintains a page of information for each bill. There are proposals to develop bill information pages further, under the name 'legislation gateways'. The new gateways will be set up for each bill at the beginning of the next Session, and will provide links to the Bill Index; the Leader of the House's website; Lords Library papers; e-Politix briefings; bill pages created by Government departments and others; draft bills; relevant briefings produced by the National Assembly for Wales research service and Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe); explanatory notes; appropriate subject pages; and parties' and others' press notices on Bills. They will also contain procedural information, flagging up when the next stage of the bill is expected to be taken.

5. Legislation gateways are intended primarily as a resource for Members, but there would be clear advantages in opening them up to the general public as a one-stop source for information about bills. Some minor details might need to be changed for public use, for example, the replacement of contact details for individual Library Researchers with details of the House of Commons Information Office, and the inclusion of links to factsheets setting out the basics of the legislative process. We welcome the Library's proposal to develop improved legislation gateways and we recommend that they be made available to the public, with any necessary modifications, on the internet.

6. The Clerk of the House suggested to us that there may be a case for the production of a simpler description of bills, for use by both Parliament itself and the general public. Explanatory notes and the Library research papers on each bill can be lengthy and dense. A simpler summary might set out a Bill's main provisions in as non-technical language as possible, linking them to its intended purposes and objectives.[3] We recommend that a simple summary of the main points of each bill, perhaps based on the summary of main points in the Library research paper, together with information about the stage in the scrutiny process it has reached, be published on the front page of the new legislation gateways.

The volume of legislation

7. A common complaint is that there is too much primary legislation. As the Chairman of Ways & Means pointed out to us, the extent to which time can be made available for more thorough scrutiny is likely to depend, at least to some extent, on the size and complexity of the Government's legislative programme for the session.[4] The table below shows the number of public Acts and the number of pages of primary legislation, including acts resulting from private Members' bills, for each year since 1992. Consolidation and tax law re-write acts are excluded: since these bills, which do not change the law substantially but merely tidy it up, are subject to special, expedited procedures, they do not have any significant impact on Parliament's overall legislative workload.

Table 1: Volume of primary legislation, 1992-2004
YearNo. of Acts No. of pages of law
1992

(election year)

551,288
199365 2,041
199442 2,005
199548 2,290
199657 2,248
1997

(election year)

621,534
199847 2,357
199935 2,063
200045 3,610
2001

(election year)

251,232
200243 2,848
200344 3,435
200438 3,470

Source: Ev 77 and Acts & Statutory Instruments: volume of UK legislation 1950 to 2005, House of Commons Library Standard Note SN/SG/2911 (January 2006).

8. There is significant fluctuation from one year to the next in the volume of legislation passed, but broadly speaking, while the total number of acts has fallen over the years, their aggregate volume—in page numbers—has risen.[5] Nonetheless, it scarcely needs to be said that, given a smaller volume of legislation each year, Parliament could devote more time to scrutinising it.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY LEGISLATION

9. Is terms of volume alone, the majority of legislation is made not by acts of Parliament (primary legislation) but by secondary or delegated legislation, also known as statutory instruments (SIs). In 2003, for example, there was a total of 8,942 pages of SIs, compared to 3,435 pages of non-consolidation acts.[6] Typically, delegated legislation is made by the Government using powers granted by an Act of Parliament. It can take a variety of forms, including Orders in Council, Rules, Regulations and Codes of Practice. Many, but not all statutory instruments are subject to some form of parliamentary control, which usually takes one of three forms:

a)  under the negative procedure (also known as annulment), an SI is made and laid before Parliament but will be annulled if either House passes a Resolution calling for it to be annulled within a particular time-limit, usually 40 days;

b)  under the affirmative procedure, an SI must usually be laid in draft and approved by a Resolution of each House before it can be made;[7]

c)  under the 'super-affirmative' procedure, used for Regulatory Reform Orders (RROs) and Remedial Orders made under the Human Rights Act, a proposal for a draft Order is laid before Parliament and examined by the relevant select committee (Regulatory Reform or Human Rights); a draft Order is then laid and proceeded with in a similar way to an affirmative SI (depended, in the case of an RRO, on how the Committee voted on it).

10. Secondary legislation has the same force in law as primary legislation, except that a court may consider whether the Government was properly exercising the powers conferred on it by Parliament in making the legislation, whereas it cannot look at the processes leading up to the passage of an Act of Parliament. To the extent that currently few SIs take up any Parliamentary time and that those that do are generally taken in standing committee, in a debate which may last up to one and a half hours, they have little bearing on Parliament's capacity to consider legislation. However there is concern in some quarters at the growing use by Government of SIs and if this led in due course either to moves to give Parliamentary time to consider more SIs or to moves to reduce the number and include more provisions in primary legislation this would have an effect on Parliament's capacity to consider legislation.

11. The factors affecting the volume of legislation are numerous and complex. Some are within the Government's control and some are not. The passage of defective legislation, in the sense of legislation which is unclear, unworkable or fails to do what it was intended to do, in itself creates the need for remedial, amending legislation, which in turn increases the legislative workload in subsequent years. Although some witnesses suggested that reducing the volume of legislation would serve to improve its quality, the volume of legislation is largely a function of the programme of the government of the day rather than a matter of procedural changes in the House. However, there are ways in which the flow of legislation can be managed effectively to ensure that, subject to the size of the Government's legislative programme and the constraints of the Parliamentary year, the best possible use is made of Parliamentary time in order to provide the most effective scrutiny of bills. They include:

a)  publishing bills in draft for pre-legislative scrutiny before they begin their formal Parliamentary stages;

b)  making appropriate use of carry-over to smooth the flow of bills throughout the Parliamentary year;

c)  using programming to ensure that adequate time is available for each stage of a bill; that time is not wasted, for example, by programming committee proceedings to finish several weeks before time can be found for remaining stages; and that the available time is allocated appropriately to different parts of the bill; and

d)  adopting a flexible approach to the time available to each bill, making more time available where it is needed, less where it is not.

In the rest of this Report, we consider ways in which these measures and others can be used to promote better scrutiny of primary legislation and, ultimately, better law.


1   The distinction between making the law and giving effect to it is significant. See, for example, Professor the Lord Norton of Louth, 'Parliament and Legislative Scrutiny: an Overview of Issues in the Legislative Process', in Brazier (Ed.), Parliament, Politics and Law Making (Hansard Society, 2005). Back

2   Blackstone, Sir W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book I, Chapter 2 (1765-69). Parliament, in this context, refers to the three constituent parts of the Crown in Parliament. Back

3   Ev 73. Back

4   Ev 98. Back

5   QQ 210 & 211. Back

6   Acts & Statutory Instruments: volume of UK legislation 1950 to 2005, House of Commons Library Standard Note SN/SG/2911 (January 2006). Back

7   Some affirmative SIs may be made and come into force before being approved by Parliament; some are required to be approved only by the House of Commons. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 7 September 2006