Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 380-399)

DEPARTMENT FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

3 MAY 2006

  Q380  Stephen Pound: Not exactly but I know what you mean. Can I say, just to pick up another point, and I am reluctant to weigh in behind any slogan of "no surrender," you mentioned, Ms MacHugh, earlier on, that after 1996 the PSNI and I cannot remember the exact words but you said they adopted a more robust role. Was that an operational decision, was that the result of statute, or was that some procedural change perhaps generated by your own Department? What was the basis for that change in direction?

  Ms MacHugh: The Regulations set down very strict controls over how clubs dealt with money on the premises. They also had to send in annual accounts to the local police station every year. That was followed up, on an annual basis, by an on-site inspection by police, and potentially one or two other, smaller inspections, and they could just walk in and do that.

  Q381  Stephen Pound: So this is a result of statutory changes?

  Ms MacHugh: Yes.

  Q382  Stephen Pound: Which piece of legislation was that?

  Ms MacHugh: It is the Clubs (Accounts) Regulations 1997, which followed on from the Clubs Registration 1996.

  Q383  Mr Anderson: Can you give us some idea of the size, of how many licensed premises there are?

  Ms MacHugh: There are just under 1,900 pubs and off-licences, and I think there are around 540 clubs and there are about 400 others, so that will be some hotels, guest-houses and other premises in which you can buy alcohol.

  Q384  Mr Anderson: There is an element of compensation we would be talking about here?

  Ms MacHugh: Yes.

  Q385  Chairman: According to Ms Carruthers, we   would also be talking of one community particularly, because she did make the point in public evidence that most licensees were from the Catholic community; is that right?

  Ms MacHugh: That would be the pubs, yes.

  Q386  Chairman: You would not dispute that?

  Ms MacHugh: No.

  Q387  Lady Hermon: May I get one point absolutely on the record. The PSNI chose this rule about the Accounts Regulations. Can I just get it clear whether in fact there is a conflict of view coming from the PSNI in relation to the surrender value of these particular licences; does the PSNI support the abolition of the surrender requirement?

  Ms MacHugh: Yes. The PSNI has been very supportive of the complete package of measures that our Minister is proposing.

  Q388  Chairman: With or without compensation?

  Ms MacHugh: With or without; I do not suppose compensation would be, I am sure that PSNI would be—

  Q389  Chairman: No; we want to get this on the record?

  Ms MacHugh: Deputy Chief Constable Paul Leighton said that the package of measures was a responsible balance in forward thinking and they have been very supportive of the whole of the proposals throughout.

  Q390  Chairman: We shall be pursuing the finance issue on Monday, when we are likely to discuss this with them.

  Ms MacHugh: Bear in mind that the proposals also give PSNI much greater enforcement powers than they had before to deal with the premises that they are worried about, and there are some rogue traders.

  Q391  Lady Hermon: Would you like to elaborate on the greater control that they will have?

  Ms MacHugh: At present, it is actually quite difficult to close down premises or to penalise premises which continue to break the law, in terms of, say, serving under-age drinkers, so we are planning to introduce a penalty points system, temporary immediate closure powers for the police, if they have a concern about a situation developing in a particular premises.

  Q392  Lady Hermon: Including powers if they suspect that there is paramilitary activity and criminality, where they will have the powers obviously to go against those other pubs or clubs?

  Ms MacHugh: Yes, and obviously they would need evidence of criminal activity and there would be greater powers to either suspend or revoke licences.

  Q393  Mr Grogan: You said there was going to an imminent statement from the Minister, or a statement soon anyway; there is a hint in what you have said and indeed in the memorandum of what might be in it. Just to check, as I understand it, on timing, that you have drawn a distinction between the proposals regarding opening hours enforcement, children and Registration of Clubs (Accounts), which in your memorandum you suggest might even come in this year. Then the other measures to do with bringing in councils, and so on, and their surrender principle, changing that, that would be 2009. I had a letter from the Minister, David Hanson, dated 19 April, when he told me that the Secretary of State and his ministerial colleagues in Northern Ireland look forward to a local Assembly being in a position to legislate on liquor licensing matters. He said the introduction of proposed new legislation is still some way off, and "I can assure you that I will consider all the views received before firming up proposals for the draft legislation." Is the Department saying that this will be left on the table until hopefully by November the Assembly will be up and running, or has the Minister powers to enact the proposals, which in your memorandum you say will come in in 2007 without fresh legislation: how is it going to work?

  Mr McGrath: I think Ministers general position is that they would hope the Assembly would determine a lot of these matters, that they would be dealt with on a local basis. I think that is recurrent in every issue we deal with at the moment. The stratagem whereby there would be two sections to this legislation, the second one because it is linked to transferring licensing to local authorities, there would be new local authorities coming into being as a result of new public administration, necessarily creates a different time-line there. That could create the potential, indeed the hope of Ministers is that particular piece of legislation would be dealt with by the Assembly, if it returned. The Minister, as Linda said earlier, is looking at the whole package and the timing of legislation at the minute and his statement will indicate how exactly he wants to take those forward.

  Q394  Mr Grogan: The first tranche of measures which in your memorandum you say could come in this year, would that require primary legislation, or has it got ministerial powers?

  Mr McGrath: Yes, it would.

  Ms MacHugh: This year, I think we are talking about 2007 by the time the legislative process will get through.

  Chairman: So it will be for the Queen's Speech.

  Q395  Rosie Cooper: Notwithstanding the subject of surrender, how similar is the proposed licensing system that you outline to the system which is being used currently in England, which is very, very regulated and has served us well over time; how similar is it to that?

  Ms MacHugh: It is similar but I think it differs in a number of very key areas. The first obviously is that we are not moving to 24-hour drinking, we are having much more curtailed hours. Secondly, as I understand the system in England, a licence is awarded unless there is objection. The system we are proposing in Northern Ireland will be much more proactive. Councils will have to seek the views of key stakeholders from the area, including local residents, the PSNI, local traders and anybody else with a vested interest in looking at how licensed premises are controlled in that area. It will be much, much more proactive and it will not be based on some sort of negative equity but unless there is an objection it will go forward. You will have to actually prove that (a) the premises are required and (b) that the person applying for that is fit and proper.

  Q396  Rosie Cooper: Do churches qualify as vested interests; would they be consulted properly, generally?

  Ms MacHugh: Yes, and it is likely that, for example, when local councils get community planning powers and they look at what is happening in their whole area, this could be one element of it, where is it appropriate for licensed premises to be and what sorts of licensed premises should be in each of the areas.

  Q397  Gordon Banks: Just to take you back a little bit to talk about the 2,500/3,000 licences roughly which exist and the £140,000, £145,000, is still what they turn over for now, how many sales are there a year of these licences?

  Ms MacHugh: I do not have any specific figures here but if you would like them I can get them for you.

  Chairman: It would be interesting, yes.

  Q398  Mr Campbell: Mr Chairman, I just wanted to move on to the issue of 2009, under the present proposals of the RPA we have seven super councils, I think they are called, and they are given the power to enforce the new regime post-2009. Given that there will be new councils, with a completely new local government regime, completely transformed since 1973, will there be any oversight of the councils enforcing the new regime?

  Ms MacHugh: Yes. In fact, each council will be required to produce a licensing policy statement, which the Department will have oversight of and I think the Minister of that Department at the time. In that, again, they will have to highlight as a council how they plan to meet the six licensing objectives which underpin all the licensing regulations.

  Q399  Mr Campbell: What will happen? You will be aware, in a different context, of similar concerns on the RPA, but let us say that there were one, or two, or even three councils and their political control was such that their approach to matters of law and order and co-operating with the police was ambiguous, to say the least, if not outright oppositional, what would happen in that circumstance? If there was some suggestion about misgivings about the allocations of licences, a council's duty was to enforce the law and there was a concern that the council was not being rigorous in pursuit of the law, in terms of the pursuit of certain licensed premises, what would happen in those circumstances?

  Mr McGrath: Each council would have to show it was addressing the six overriding objectives. Clearly, Ministers want a system whereby each council can perhaps have some flexibility, otherwise you would have just a uniform system, but equally we would not envisage that any council, in a sense, would jettison any one of the objectives, one of which was about preventing crime and disorder.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 5 July 2006