Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 440-459)

DEPARTMENT FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

3 MAY 2006

  Q440  Chairman: There are a lot of good questions there. Give us good, comprehensive answers that will convert us all to be absolutely convinced that you have all the right solutions and you are going to implement them with the vigour and urgency that should characterise people charged with this duty?

  Mr Wall: I will do my best, Chairman. The quickest way to identify that is the ways in which we envisage the powers of the Commission being different from the powers of the Commission in England and Wales. Currently, the Commission for England and Wales does not cover all charities, it covers, as I understand it, only about 60% of the sector. Some of those, schools, for example, perhaps will not be considered to be high risk, but small charities would be probably one area where there could be the establishment of sham charities and the need for broader regulation, so we are proposing that all charities will be subject to registration, regardless of size. Secondly, there will be a public benefit test in   the Northern Ireland regulation which the Commission will apply. The third and perhaps most important in terms of your concerns as regards financial control, there will be much more rigorous accounting standards that will apply in terms of regulation of charities in Northern Ireland. Currently in England and Wales charities which spend over £90,000 per annum have to declare their full accounts and only where they have a turnover of over half a million pounds do they have to carry out a full professional audit. Under the proposals that we are putting forward, all charities will be required to produce evidence of their accounts. For those spending less than £10,000 a year, they will have to produce an independent examination of their accounts. For those between £10,000 and £100,000, they will have to produce full accrual accounts plus independent examination; and for those spending in any one year more than £100,000 they will have to carry out a full professional audit. There will be a regulatory framework which will be much tighter, in   terms of examining the financial probity of registered charities, all registered charities.

  Q441  Chairman: How soon can all that become operative?

  Mr Wall: According to the timetable we have at the   minute, we are hoping to commence the establishment of the Commission next year. I would hope that we would have the Commission operating fully as quickly as possible, and we will certainly be mindful as regards the concerns in terms of the control of crime. There is an issue, however, in that it will take a certain amount of time actually to get people on to the register.

  Q442  Chairman: Good people will be watching and listening with interest to your evidence, and all these vague descriptions of time are a little bit tantalising, so can you put some figures on as quickly as possible? We have got "shortly" down, so we are making some progress, but when do you think the people of Northern Ireland can feel that if they give money to a charity they are indeed giving money for a charitable purpose?

  Mr Wall: It is intended that the Commission will be established in March 2007. I would hope that within 12 months we would have clear evidence of a Charity Commission operating which the Northern Ireland public can depend upon.

  Q443  Chairman: So give with great care until 2008 and then you can give with abandon?

  Mr Wall: One should always give with care, I trust.

  Q444  Rosie Cooper: How will the Charity Commission be alerted, other than via the accounts, which no doubt can be handled if you are sufficiently interested to make sure of that? In England and Wales they tend to wait for people to `phone in, and we have looked at various task forces where the police do not notify each other, they do not go out proactively themselves seeking evidence of fraud. How will they operate, what will be the thing that starts an inquiry?

  Mr Wall: An inquiry by a member of the public will be one route. We are establishing a regulatory forum, which will include the regulators across the UK but will also include the police and the Revenue. The legislation will also include gateways, in terms of sharing information between the Revenue and the Police Service and the Commission.

  Q445  Rosie Cooper: Will that be required, or will it be they find out about an organisation which they think is possibly not a charity and being used for the wrong reasons; will they be required to pass on that information to the Charity Commission and other organisations, or will it be just left in the air, they may do, they may not?

  Mr Wall: Are you talking about the police or the Revenue?

  Q446  Rosie Cooper: If the Revenue find out, will they be required to make sure the Charity Commission know, will they be required to pass it on to the police and the Organised Crime Task Force, or whatever; will that be required? I think it is really important, because otherwise some people will say it is perhaps not high on their agenda and it will just go by the by.

  Mr Wall: I think it will be clearly in the interests of the objectives of both the Police Service and the Inland Revenue, where crime is suspected, to share that information with the Commission, in terms of ensuring improved regulation and control of crime.

  Q447  Rosie Cooper: Is there a difference between "in the interests of" and "required"; that is the point I am trying to get to?

  Mr Wall: I would need to check the actual wording of the legislation, to give you an answer. I will provide that for you at a later date.

  Q448  Chairman: Perhaps it would be sensible to have a requirement for co-operation with the Organised Crime Task Force, and perhaps you could take that one on board?

  Mr Wall: I will take that on board.

  Q449  Stephen Pound: Did you say seven to nine thousand, or 79,000?

  Mr Wall: Seven to nine.

  Q450  Stephen Pound: I was just working out in my head whether that was one charity for every 31,000 people; it seems to me a pretty extraordinary figure. There are a number of charities that I am personally involved in, like the RNLI and the Soldiers', Sailors' and Airmen's Families Association, which are UK charities, so even though they operate in Northern Ireland they are based in the UK. How many of those charities that you are talking about are ones which already come within the aegis of the Charity Commission because they happen to have their office of record in GB?

  Mr Wall: I have not got numbers. There are different kinds of charities in terms of the relationship with GB; some Northern Ireland branches, if you like, have more autonomy than others, as a kind of franchise. My guess is that we are talking in the hundreds, not above a thousand, a smaller number.

  Q451  Stephen Pound: I may say, I am just trying to reduce your workload here.

  Mr Wall: If a charity operates in Northern Ireland under the new regulatory system, they will have to register separately in Northern Ireland, but there will be administrative mechanisms to ensure that information is shared between the different Commissions to ensure that there is not too onerous an administrative burden placed upon charities.

  Q452  Stephen Pound: An organisation like Guide Dogs for the Blind, for example, or even Greenpeace, or whatever, if they are registered here, would still have to register locally?

  Mr Wall: They would still be required to register in Northern Ireland.

  Q453  Stephen Pound: Have you considered a case of 15 years ago? There was an organisation called the West Belfast Family and Children Support Services Group, which was in fact a front for the IRA, and a number of people in the part of west London that I live in gave money to this, thinking it was for the suffering children, and it ended up causing suffering to children. The people who gave that money were actually charged under the then anti-terrorism legislation, including someone rather close to me. Has that consideration come in, because it seems to me, if you have got even a partially unregulated system at the present time, it is not only the fact that the money is going to undesirable places but actually you are creating criminals here?

  Mr Wall: The new system will not be partially unregulated, it will be more regulated than anywhere else in the United Kingdom.

  Q454  Stephen Pound: That message to the potential donors would go out?

  Mr Wall: That is right and we are also introducing stringent controls in terms of public collections of monies, which will apply to all charities.

  Q455  Stephen Pound: Who will license the public collections?

  Mr Wall: The Commission will issue an authorisation for any organisation that wants to collect money publicly. The council then will have to issue a specific permit in terms of the specific collection that is intended.

  Q456  Stephen Pound: For street collection and on private premises?

  Mr Wall: No, not on private premises; for public collections.

  Q457  Chairman: I think it is very important that you do take on board the concerns of the Committee that the involvement, or potential involvement, of criminal elements, be they paramilitary-based or otherwise, must be dealt with by close liaison with the Organised Crime Task Force and other means. I am sure you do take all that on board, and I am sure that you also have some idea of the amount of funds that have been diverted to illicit use, so you know presumably the extent of the problem that you are going to be facing?

  Mr Wall: We are certainly convinced of the extent of the problem. I think the relationships that have already been established between the various authorities will enable us to build well upon that. I also think we have mechanisms to be able to measure the problem in future.

  Q458  Gordon Banks: Very briefly, because Lady Hermon somewhat stole my thunder on some issues I was going to raise. Going back to the Goldstock Report, which basically you said was not a pattern that you wanted, that you were looking for, do you see that there are any other sectors which could benefit from regulation in a way that Professor Goldstock did actually suggest; sectors such as taxi firms?

  Mr McGrath: I am not sure we have a view on that, to be honest.

  Q459  Gordon Banks: You do not think there is any other sector in Northern Ireland that could benefit from IPSIGs, if you like, that you would have an interest in?

  Mr McGrath: Our primary interest in terms of the Department, in terms of the sector, is the voluntary and community sector, which is actually a very vibrant and active sector in Northern Ireland. As a Department, there is not another sector that we have sponsorship or oversight of, apart from the licensing trade we have just spoken about and other elements in social policy.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 5 July 2006