Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Written Evidence


8.  Written evidence from HM Revenue and Customs

  1.  The Government is committed to tackling tax fraud in order to protect the revenue required for investment in public services, to protect legitimate business from being undermined by dishonest competition and to protect society from organised crime.

  2.  This memorandum provides information on the role and responsibilities of HM Revenue and Customs (paragraphs 3-5), the threat posed by organised crime to those responsibilities in Northern Ireland (paragraphs 6-9), more detail on HM Revenue and Customs priorities in Northern Ireland—oils fraud (paragraphs 11-18) and tobacco smuggling (paragraphs 19-30)—and HM Revenue and Customs" role in the Organised Crime Task Force (paragraphs 31-33).

HM REVENUE AND CUSTOMS

  3.  HM Revenue and Customs was established on 18 April 2005 through the merger of HM Customs and Excise and the Inland Revenue.

  4.  The new department is responsible for collecting the bulk of tax revenue as well as paying tax credits and child benefit, and strengthening the UK's frontiers. As a result, HM Revenue and Customs manage:

    —  Income, Corporation, Capital Gains, Inheritance, Insurance Premium, Stamp, Land and Petroleum Revenue Taxes;

    —  Environmental taxes: climate change and aggregates levy and landfill tax;

    —  VAT;

    —  Customs Duties and frontier protection;

    —  Excise Duties;

    —  National Insurance;

    —  Tax Credits;

    —  Child Benefit and the Child Trust Fund;

    —  Enforcement of the National Minimum Wage; and

    —  Recovery of Student Loan repayments.

  5.  The aim of HM Revenue and Customs is to administer the tax and customs control systems fairly and efficiently and make it as easy as possible for individuals and businesses to understand and comply with their obligations and receive their tax credit and other entitlements. Our mission is to provide an increasingly efficient and high quality service that:

    —  helps people and businesses understand and meet their tax obligations and understand and receive their entitlements;

    —  strengthens frontier protection; and

    —  tackles those who do not comply.

THREATS TO THE UK TAX SYSTEM FROM ORGANISED CRIME IN NORTHERN IRELAND

  6.  From a United Kingdom perspective, it is clear from our everyday work that a number of the regimes, which we are responsible for are subject to concerted attack by organised criminality; in particular:

    —  the principal excise regimes—tobacco, alcohol and road fuels; and

    —  value added tax (VAT) through Missing Trader fraud (MTIC).

  7.  We also believe that many serious and organised criminals do not comply with their direct tax obligations and, as a consequence, do not pay the right amount of direct tax. HM Revenue and Customs is continuing to work with others in law enforcement to tackle serious offences, including direct tax evasion. For example, this has already resulted in several cases of criminal prosecution for tax evasion in Northern Ireland, in which the former Inland Revenue worked with the Police Service of Northern Ireland and others, in cases in which tax evasion was suspected of being linked to other serious offences.

  8.  In Northern Ireland specifically, the most serious attacks on the tax regimes involve cigarette smuggling and road fuels fraud; set out below are further details of the nature and size of these threats, HM Revenue and Customs' approach to tackling these threats and the impact to date on them. It is clear, however, from our operational activity and intelligence that Northern Ireland-based criminality are important players in the illegal oils and cigarettes market throughout the United Kingdom. Their activity and influence extend beyond supplying illegal markets in Northern Ireland and encompasses involvement in such criminal activity throughout the United Kingdom.

  9.  It is important to note that since 2000, HM Revenue and Customs (then HM Customs and Excise) have taken a new strategic approach to tackling indirect tax fraud. This strategic approach has five components:

    —  analysis: understanding of the nature of any revenue loss problem is an important first step in measuring its size, analysing the trends in its development, and ensuring the effective deployment of strategies to tackle them;

    —  estimates: it is also important to establish a robust baseline of the size of a problem against which targets can be set and monitored. Estimates of the revenue loss problems facing the indirect tax regimes are now published on a routine basis wherever possible. The latest estimates of indirect tax losses, and the methodologies behind them, were published as part of the Pre-Budget report in December 2005 in the "Measuring Indirect Tax Losses" document;

    —  targets: the new approach has seen a switch from a focus on outputs to a balanced combination of activities designed to hit outcome targets. Each strategy needs to be geared towards a clear outcome in terms of its impact on the scale of the problem, so that the appropriate operational responses can be drawn up to meet those targets, and so the effectiveness of the strategy can be routinely measured;

    —  responses: each strategy must feature a range of measures which apply proportionate and well-targeted pressure at all levels of the problem. In some cases, where losses occur because of fundamental weaknesses in the way the tax is controlled, the first step must be to establish a sustainable control regime; and

    —  monitoring: performance in meeting the key outcome-based targets is measured and reported on a regular basis, accompanied where relevant by operational data which shows progress in individual areas. The development of the problem must also be carefully monitored so that operational responses can be adapted accordingly, and new measures brought forward.

  10.  Finally, the creation of HM Revenue and Customs provides an opportunity in tackling organised criminality, as in other areas, to work in a co-ordinated way across direct and indirect taxes, pooling the information, expertise and resources available across HM Revenue and Customs to gain the maximum impact against those who engage in serious criminal activity.

Oils Fraud

  11.  The nature of oils fraud in Northern Ireland centres around two specific kinds of fraud—rebated fuels fraud and road fuel smuggling—but both are driven principally by organised criminality.

  12.  Rebated fuels—red diesel and kerosene—along with oils used of industrial processes known as "tied oils" can be used in road fuel frauds in three ways:

    —  laundering—the treatment of rebated and duty-free fuels with chemicals to remove their markers and dyes and make identification of use as a road fuel harder;

    —  mixing—combining rebated and duty-free oils to make an illegal road fuel or to dilute road diesel; and

    —  misuse—illegally using unadulterated rebated and duty-free fuels in road vehicles.

  13.  In Great Britain, rebated fuels fraud is the single, biggest threat in terms of oils fraud. Unlike the rest of Great Britain, in Northern Ireland road fuel smuggling is also present in significant volumes; that is the smuggling of road fuel duty paid in another member state, in this case the Republic of Ireland, into Northern Ireland.

  14.  Finally, it is important to note that while we believe the majority of illicit fuel is not sold through legitimate filling stations in Great Britain, our latest assessment is that a very significant proportion of the illicit fuel sold in Northern Ireland is sold through retail filling stations.

  15.  At present, we cannot identify the amount of revenue lost from oils fraud in Northern Ireland. However, we can successfully estimate the amount of revenue lost from all forms of oils fraud and cross-border shopping. Our latest estimates are set out in the table below:
20002001 20022003 2004


Diesel Revenue
£230m £215m£210m £220m£180m
Diesel Market Share62% 58%55%52% 42%
Petrol Revenue£90m £75m£75m£85m £65m
Petrol Market Share23% 20%20%23% 18%


  16.  Customs have had in place since 2000 a developing strategy to tackle oils fraud. This strategy is based on three initiatives:

    —  beginning in 2000, increasing the number of officers engaged in tackling oils fraud from 25 to over 160; this level of resource has been maintained since 2001;

    —  implementing in Northern Ireland, as elsewhere, the UK Oils strategy which is principally focused on tackling rebated fuels fraud which includes the introduction of a regulatory regime to control the sale of rebated fuels, the creation of a new central intelligence unit to direct all operational activity, additional funding for new investigation, control, testing and intelligence officers to tackle oils fraud and a hard-hitting publicity campaign to highlight the risks of illegal fuel use; and

    —  leading multi-agency working in the road fuels sector, working with other agencies under the umbrella of the Organised Crime Task Force to maximise the impact of Government intervention in the whole road fuel sector.

  17.  This strategy has led us to some specific operational tactics to tackle oils fraud, In particular, we have targeted the organised crime groups behind oils fraud and between April 2000 and March 2004 we have dismantled 13 criminal organisations in Northern Ireland engaged in oils fraud, broken up 65 laundering and mixing plants in Northern Ireland and seized over 8 million litres of illegal fuel. HM Revenue and Customs' latest operational results will be published shortly as part of the 2004/2005 Annual Report.

  18.  The strategy HM Revenue and Customs have developed and put into place since 2000 has resulted in a reducing share of the Northern Ireland market which is not UK-duty paid; a reduction of 22% and 32% for petrol and diesel respectively. It is also worth noting that between 1996 and 2000 the volume of legitimate road fuel declined steeply year on year by around 36% in total. However, following the introduction of HM Revenue and Customs' strategy in 2000 we have seen this downward trend reversed year on year with volumes now up 28% in 2004 compared to 2000.

Cigarette Smuggling

  19.  The majority by volume of tobacco fraud detected by Customs involves large-scale organised smuggling of large quantities (typically between one to 8 million sticks at a time) in freight. These cigarettes are generally sourced from outside the EU and will carry little or no tax. Seizures of large-scale freight-smuggled cigarettes very rarely involve stock that has had duty paid anywhere within the EU. A typical smuggling operation will involve a number of independent groups working as links in a chain to get illicit product from source to the UK smoker. Each organisation involved in moving product along the illicit distribution chain will expect to profit from its part of the process. Typically there will be at least four links in the supply chain. Genuine products sourced in global wholesale markets may be obtained for as little as 70p per pack (significantly less still for counterfeit). The typical UK illicit street price is around £2.50 per pack.

  20.  At the lower end of the smuggled market more product is sourced EU duty paid and brought into the UK by large gangs of air passengers working as "runners" for organised groups.

  21.  When HM Revenue and Customs' strategy to tackle this problem began in 2000 the majority of product seized was of UK manufactured origin. Since then the preponderance of UK manufactured product has fallen steadily and an increasing proportion is counterfeit. In 2003-04 54% of seized cigarettes were counterfeit compared to 15% in 2001-02.

  22.  The table below sets out HM Revenue and Customs' latest estimates of the size of the illicit cigarette market in the United Kingdom as a whole, including Northern Ireland. It is not possible to identify the size of the illicit market in Northern Ireland, or any particular region of the United Kingdom, separately.
2000-012001-02 2002-032003-04
Revenue Loss£2.7bn £2.5bn£2.0bn£2.2bn
Illicit Market Share21% 20%15%16%


  23.  The Government launched its Tackling Tobacco Smuggling strategy in March 2000 against a background of increasing growth in tobacco smuggling which, it is estimated, would have seen the illicit market grow to some 34% by 2002-03 if no action had been taken.

  24.  The strategy is based on attacking the economic profitability and risk/reward ratio of smuggling through an end-to-end strategy of disruption. It involves the suppression of supply of UK manufactured product, legislative change, the use of new technology, and increased resources both at the ports, overseas and inland. Taken together this has reduced the profits available to smugglers by driving up their costs and has increased the chance of their getting caught.

  25.  The strategy launched in March 2000 included an increase in the number of officers deployed to tackle cigarette smuggling by almost 1000 in the UK and overseas, the introduction of a national network of x-ray scanners, working closely with tobacco manufacturers to suppress the availability of UK manufactured cigarettes to smugglers abroad and the new legislative measures which introduced "UK Duty Paid" fiscal marks on tobacco products to help prevent, detect and deter the handling, distribution, sale and purchase of smuggled tobacco.

  26.  The strategy has been developed and refreshed since its launch in March 2000 both in anticipation of and in response to changing patterns of behaviour as the fraudsters react to our efforts. Most recently the Government has announced in the Pre-Budget Report a number of initiatives to enhance the strategy to tackle tobacco smuggling including:

    —  agreeing improved Memoranda of Understanding with UK tobacco manufacturers to restrict the availability of cigarettes to smugglers, and to tackle the problem of counterfeit material, including consultation on options for introducing covert markings for the UK tobacco retail market;

    —  consulting with the industry on complementary legislation to be introduced in Finance Bill 2006, aimed at preventing organised criminal gangs from exploiting weaknesses in supply chains for tobacco products;

    —  deploying 200 staff specifically to tackle the smuggling of hand-rolling tobacco; and

    —  reviewing operational activities to deliver maximum impact against the growing threat from counterfeit tobacco products smuggling.

  27.  To measure delivery of the strategy, key targets were set for the percentage of the market accounted for by smuggled cigarettes for each year up to 2005-06. Since the introduction of the Tackling Tobacco Smuggling strategy we have managed to slow, stabilise and reverse the growth in tobacco smuggling, reducing the illicit cigarette market share to 16% in 2003-04, against a target of 20%; see the table below.
2000-012001-02 2002-032003-04 2004-052005-06


Smuggled Share Target (%)
21 222120 1817
Smuggled Share Actual (%)21 201516 n/an/a


  28.  The illicit cigarette market in Northern Ireland has the same characteristics as in the rest of the United Kingdom. Moreover, it is important to note that, in common with Great Britain, seizures made in Northern Ireland are not necessarily destined for the Northern Ireland market.

  29.  Our activity in Northern Ireland, as in the rest of the United Kingdom, has been focused on strategic aims and operational tactics. The examples below illustrate some of the particular operations we have run in Northern Ireland highlighting the nature and seriousness of the criminality involved:

    —  in November 2005, HM Revenue and Customs officers detected 2.94 million Superkings cigarettes on board a refrigerated trailer within the confines of Belfast Port attempting to board a ferry to Stranraer. The driver claimed he was taking the consignment of "vegetables" to Manchester. This particular consignment had originated in Belgium and upon entry to the Port of Rosslare transited through the Republic of Ireland before being detected in Belfast. The driver was arrested and charged by HM Revenue and Customs and is awaiting trial.

    —  in November 2005 the Police Service of Northern Ireland and HM Revenue and Customs detected some 15.4 million mixed brand cigarettes in one site in North Armagh. Evidence seized at the site indicates the source of the cigarettes is Spain. Three men were arrested at the scene, all three were charged. One of these individuals was granted bail with substantial sureties required and the other two are presently remanded in custody.

  30.  As these illustrations demonstrate, serious and organised criminality are behind cigarette smuggling and our response must utilise all the tools available to HM Revenue and Customs.

The Organised Crime Task Force

  31.  All of our work in Northern Ireland to tackle organised criminality attacking the tax regimes we are responsible for, especially those attacks on our priority areas of cigarette smuggling and oils fraud, is done as part of the multi-agency approach championed by the Organised Crime Task Force.

  32.  HM Revenue and Customs is a central element of the Organised Crime Task Force and is fully committed to ensuring that law enforcement agencies work together. HM Revenue and Customs have seen how through a multi-agency approach of sharing information, supporting activity of others and working together in joint operations, we can make a greater impact on the problems that we face.

  33.  In particular, our multi-agency work on oils fraud, where we work very closely with a range of Government agencies, gives us clear evidence of the additional success such an approach brings.

HM Revenue and Customs

December 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 5 July 2006