UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 886-iv

House of COMMONS

MINUTES OF EVIDENCE

TAKEN BEFORE

Northern Ireland Affairs Committee

 

 

 

ORGANISED CRIME IN Northern Ireland

 

 

Wednesday 8 MARCH 2006

 

MRS NICHOLA CARRUTHERS

Evidence heard in Public Questions 225- 304

 

 

USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT

1.

This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others.

 

2.

Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither witnesses nor Members have had the opportunity to correct the record. The transcript is not yet an approved formal record of these proceedings.

 

3.

Members who receive this for the purpose of correcting questions addressed by them to witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Committee Assistant.

 

4.

Prospective witnesses may receive this in preparation for any written or oral evidence they may in due course give to the Committee.

 


Oral Evidence

Taken before the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee

on Wednesday 8 March 2006

Members present

Sir Patrick Cormack, in the Chair

Mr David Anderson

Gordon Banks

Mr Gregory Campbell

Rosie Cooper

Mr Christopher Fraser

Mr John Grogan

Mr Stephen Hepburn

Lady Hermon

Meg Hillier

Stephen Pound

Sammy Wilson

________________

Memorandum submitted by Federation of the Retail Licensed Trade Northern Ireland

 

Examination of Witness

 

Witness: Mrs Nichola Carruthers, Chief Executive, Federation of the Retail Licensed Trade Northern Ireland, gave evidence.

Q225 Chairman: Good afternoon. Are you on your own?

Mrs Carruthers: Yes.

Q226 Chairman: Mrs Carruthers, you are extremely welcome. Thank you very much for agreeing to come and give evidence to the inquiry this afternoon. As you know, we are looking into organised crime. Yours is the first organisation to field a single witness so all the questions will obviously be directed to you. Would you like to say a word about your organisation and put us in the picture and make any opening statement that you think would be helpful to you or to the Committee?

Mrs Carruthers: Thank you very much, Chairman. I am the Chief Executive of the Federation of the Retail Licensed Trade, Northern Ireland. We represent about 1100 members. The vast majority of our members would be pubs but we also represent off-licences and a number of hotels and restaurants, but by far and away the biggest category would be pubs.

Q227 Chairman: What percentage of the pubs would that be?

Mrs Carruthers: About 70%. We are the only trade association that represents the licensed trade in Northern Ireland, and we have been around in some shape or form since 1873, so the organisation has been around for a length of time. We have members from all across Northern Ireland and we have no one area where we have a bigger spread of members or where we are under represented; so the 70% is pretty much across the board. We are a small organisation, that said, with a very small staff. We do have a dedicated training department, and much of our time these days is spent in providing industry training courses and trying to raise standards across the industry. We very much welcome this inquiry. I will try to be as helpful as possible, to the best of my ability. That is all I would like to say.

Q228 Chairman: Thank you very much indeed. I should say at the beginning that some of our witnesses have chosen to give some of their evidence in private. If you feel, during the course of questioning, that there are matters which you would rather deal with privately, then we will be very happy to give you ten minutes or whatever at the end. We have other witnesses who are indeed going to give evidence in private this afternoon, and so I am quite anxious that we encompass our session with you by four o'clock, if you can; but obviously if there are points that we are still doing we will continue. Do you have any affiliate body in the Republic?

Mrs Carruthers: Not formal affiliation. We are members of an organisation called the United Kingdom and Ireland Licensed Trade Association. We are a member of that, as is the Federation of Licensed Victuallers in England, which represents largely tenants and other operators, the Scottish Licensed Trade Association and the Vintners Federation of Ireland. There is no full-time member from Wales and their set-up is slightly different to our own, but we do have very close links with our colleagues in the Republic.

Q229 Chairman: You do; and are those amicable links?

Mrs Carruthers: Absolutely.

Q230 Chairman: What evidence do you have to support your view that the illegal alcohol trade, to quote your written evidence - for which many thanks - continues to grow and flourish?

Mrs Carruthers: Chairman, it is really the evidence from what my members tell me of what happens in their local areas, and also the evidence from the police. We have very close working relationships with the police across Northern Ireland in all areas. We had someone from the police attend a general meeting of our Federation a couple of years ago specifically on the issue of illegal sales of alcohol, and especially counterfeit alcohol and counterfeit money. They were of the view that the problem was a large one in Northern Ireland; that there were certain areas in Northern Ireland where the counterfeit alcohol is being produced on an alarming scale. There is the evidence from there and also from our dealings with local drug and alcohol teams across Northern Ireland. They would tell us that illegal sales from sources such as markets, ice cream vans, sales door-to-door, sales from taxis, would be a significant problem, and that would be something that a lot of our members would tell us as well.

Q231 Chairman: Do you share the view that has been advanced by others who have given evidence that organised crime has become and continues to be more sophisticated?

Mrs Carruthers: It is a difficult area for me to comment on, to be perfectly honest. Organised crime and crime in general are not issues that my members discuss a lot. There is certainly a perception out there. Whether it is a perception that is based on hard evidence or hard fact, or it is a perception from what one reads in the newspapers and the stories one hears, it is very difficult to know. There would certainly be a perception in the society of Northern Ireland amongst my members that crime and organised crime is a problem, but it is exceptionally difficult to quantify because it is not something that we can talk about. It is also difficult to know where organised crime stops and crime per se starts.

Q232 Chairman: As far as crime is concerned, do you think that the ordinary - I hate to use this term - the ordinary, everyday drug that manifests itself perhaps in public houses in the rest of the UK is not such a problem in Northern Ireland; it is rather the organised, sophisticated crime?

Mrs Carruthers: It would be very difficult for me to say that. The types of crime that the average pub would face would be people running off without paying, but mostly things like silly fights and criminal damage. I imagine that is the problem across the United Kingdom and Ireland. Our off-licence members would tell us that they would suffer a significant amount of thefts and robberies whether through grab-and-runs of their premises or moneys being stolen from the Securicor vans doing deliveries. Again, when they are recording those they are just recorded as incidents; they do not know whether it is necessarily organised or not.

Q233 Chairman: Are you happy with the levels of co-operation you receive from PSNI, with the efficiency of PSNI, or are there problems on that front?

Mrs Carruthers: Again, it is a difficult one. As a federation we have good working relationships with the PSNI across Northern Ireland. We work on a lot of local initiatives together. A lot of them are partnerships and they provide training for us, for providing door supervisors, et cetera: but if you were to ask me was that a view shared by all the members of the Federation, I would have to say not. We did some research amongst the membership a couple of years ago, basically to ask whether they would be comfortable in phoning the police and asking for assistance or reporting crimes. A good portion of them were; 80% said there was no difficulty in contacting the police for assistance; but 20% of them said they would not, and reasons for that ranged from political sensibilities to, "there is no point - slow response time; nothing will happen".

Q234 Chairman: Was that reluctance mainly from the Catholic community?

Mrs Carruthers: The pub trade in Northern Ireland is largely Catholic. It is a historical thing. We would estimate that about 80% of pubs in Northern Ireland would be Catholic-owned and run.

Q235 Chairman: The vast majority of them would be quite happy calling in the PSNI, and just a small group would not.

Mrs Carruthers: Yes.

Q236 Mr Anderson: I want to ask you particularly about shebeens. You said in your submission to the Committee that they were widespread. Can you give us some idea of the scale of them and the nature of them? Are we talking about farms or houses? Do you think there any link between these and paramilitaries?

Mrs Carruthers: Shebeens in Northern Ireland were really started in the late 1960s and early 1970s, really as a result of the troubles and curfews that were imposed in certain areas. So drinking clubs sprang up and they were very widespread. As time went on more and more of those clubs became legitimate and they were brought within the proper registered club system. The registered clubs numbers grew from about 200 in the early 1970s to around 600 at the end of the time. A lot of the registered clubs, the properly run registered clubs, that we have these days did start off as shebeens. These days, when members would refer to shebeens, it is any form of illegal drinking den. Thinking about this, reports in the last year have not been that great. They seem to come in spates. It seemed a couple of years ago that I was getting a lot of reports about various shebeens around the country, whether they be in sheds, front rooms, possibly linked to farms. As to whether or not they are linked to paramilitaries, I could not say.

Q237 Mr Anderson: Have you any idea of numbers, which is the question I asked earlier?

Mrs Carruthers: I honestly would not know. I would simply be guessing.

Q238 Mr Anderson: Is it possible you can estimate the impact on your members on legitimate venues?

Mrs Carruthers: You have got both the impact obviously on turnover, on customers; you have also got the fact that some of the shebeens would be getting their alcohol from illegal sources. They might even be making their own, for all anyone knows. There would be an effect both on the legitimate trade on registered clubs and on pubs because obviously if people are going to shebeens, that is a lot cheaper and they would not be going to proper licensed premises. Also, you do not know where the alcohol in shebeens is coming from, where it is supplied from. We heard, for example, that one shebeen - I was told that was in existence - had proper taps, proper kegs. Where are these coming from?

Q239 Mr Anderson: What is the address for that one!

Mrs Carruthers: Obviously, at that time we spoke to the police and also spoke to the brewers to see whether they were able to be of assistance; and as far as I know that one is no longer there. They can be very inventive in the way they get access to alcohol, and that inventiveness fuels the illegal drinks supply, and it keeps going.

Q240 Mr Anderson: You mentioned to the Chairman about links with the PSNI. Is it possible to see how successful they have been in closing these places down?

Mrs Carruthers: It is very difficult actually because some district command units would be more helpful than others. In this particular instance they were talking about this particular subject. I fully understand the problems that the PSNI faces in certain areas in Northern Ireland, and I know that for example when I did report a shebeen once I was told that the police knew about it and had knowledge of it and were trying to manage the situation; but they were obviously trying to build links with the local community in that area, and so that type of set-up had to be handled in a very different way to how a different type of shebeen might be handled.

Q241 Mr Anderson: You are not suggesting the police turn a blind eye.

Mrs Carruthers: No.

Q242 Mr Anderson: It is just that sometimes -----

Mrs Carruthers: No, it is just that things have to be managed in different ways.

Q243 Sammy Wilson: On the question of illegal drinking in clubs, there was some disturbing comment on the change of regulations, either in regard to licensing and the lifting of the cap on licence, and the ease with which that will allow people to enter the industry - and also the deregulation of pubs: do you see that as a big potential for swinging some of these illegal shebeens into the legal end of the market? In doing so of course it is much easier to launder stolen fuel and money?

Mrs Carruthers: Absolutely; it is a huge issue. The whole licensing review is a huge issue for the licensed trade at the moment. The Registration of Clubs (Accounts) Regulations were put into place ten years ago to try to stop money being laundered through the clubs. The vast, vast majority of registered clubs are run perfectly well and properly, as they should be. The Registration of Clubs (Accounts) Regulations are a significant burden for some of those clubs; but at the same time they were put into force for a very legitimate reason - to try to stop an avenue for money, fuel, alcohol or whatever to be laundered. At the moment the proposal is that the Registration of Clubs (Accounts) Regulations go. They are also proposing that clubs are deregulated to a certain extent to make them more like pubs, in that they will have the same opening hours and the same modus operandi as pubs. They are also proposing removing the cap on the number of licences in Northern Ireland. For those members who are unaware, there is a different licensing system in Northern Ireland. In order to open a pub or an off-sales you have to purchase an existing licence. It means that there is a significant financial commitment that goes into entering the licensed trade. As you may be aware, the licensed trade is very much a cash trade, but it has been identified by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs as a type of business which money can be laundered through. It would be the trade's view that the proposed changes to the Northern Ireland licensing legislation could legitimise some of the illegitimate sources out there, or simply just make it easier for others to enter the trade and to launder money.

Q244 Sammy Wilson: In our recommendations, Nichola, if I could draw this out for you, how important is it that in seeking to stop organised crime getting a bigger hold on the industry, we and government address the issues you have just talked about?

Mrs Carruthers: We believe it is absolutely vital. The problem that the Committee has addressed of organised crime in Northern Ireland and the difficulty people have of getting a handle on it and getting to know its many tentacles and strands - we need to cut off as many avenues as we possibly can and not make things easier; so it is absolutely fundamental that the Government looks closely at proposals of licensing. Indeed, in the Organised Crime Task Force annual report it identified that one of the areas it wanted to look at in the coming year was charities legislation, which I know the Committee has been discussing, but also the regulatory framework for hotels, pubs and taxis. I only came across this when I was preparing for the Committee because we have not had any dealings with Organised Crime Task Force, and I am not aware that the task force or the Assets Recovery Agency was consulted when drawing up the current proposals for deregulation of licensing.

Q245 Lady Hermon: Do you think the Minister is listening to the views you have given about the change to the licensing regulations?

Mrs Carruthers: I very much hope that the Minister will be listening. The consultation period is now closed. I know there have been about a thousand responses to the proposals. Not all those responses are yet on the website but at the last count we noticed that there were 622 responses against the proposals and six in favour. It is also worth noting that there is complete cross-party support on this, which is unusual in Northern Ireland! We very much hope that the Minister will listen. The consultation is a genuine consultation.

Chairman: We all hope that the consultations are genuine, or at least this one is. We are listening very carefully to what you say and we shall be framing recommendations based on our evaluation of the evidence we have received. Up to now, yours is very good.

Q246 Mr Campbell: In your correspondence with the Committee you made reference to the taxis selling alcohol. That issue has been around in Northern Ireland for some time in anecdotal form. What evidence is there from your members and what knowledge and experience is there of that as an issue? Is it a big issue; is it growing; what sort of impact is it having?

Mrs Carruthers: It is a big issue. In the past, a lot of tax drivers would have maybe pleaded ignorance about what they were doing. That is less likely to happen these days because the police have now become a lot more aware of the problem, and we have certainly run joint seminars with the police to highlight the issues around taxi deliveries of alcohol. Some of our members would say that in the past they were aware of taxis coming in buying off them, which is becoming less of a problem. The individual taxi driver delivering to customers' houses is possibly becoming less of a problem because awareness is certainly growing and police awareness is certainly growing. One area that has long been a problem would be the more organised taxi deliveries. These spring up in various forms, and it is pretty easy to get the evidence for it because they advertise quite widely; they are not shy about putting leaflets through doors saying "Dial a drink 24 hours a day".

Q247 Chairman: Is it a black label, black taxi?

Mrs Carruthers: No, it would tend to be minicab taxis. There are many cab firms that would advertise "dial a drink" quite openly, 24 hours a day. We are also aware that there are taxis which just drive round with a stock of alcohol in their boot. Anecdotally I can tell you that a good friend of mine asked a taxi driver to stop at an off-licence for them when they were on the way to a friend's house, and the taxi driver said, "there is no need" and opened the boot of the car, and there was a selection to choose from.

Chairman: It is not very good for the claret, though, driving it around like that!

Sammy Wilson: I do not think it is claret they are drinking, Chairman!

Q248 Mr Campbell: This is Northern Ireland, Chairman; I just remind you!

Mrs Carruthers: I think you tend to get a choice of one vodka and two types of beer. That seems to be all that is available. I also know that there are other minicab firms that operate systems from residential homes with alcohol being stored in garages. These are obviously passed on to the police.

Chairman: This is a new world, is it not?

Q249 Mr Campbell: You are saying that some of it is becoming less of a problem.

Mrs Carruthers: Yes.

Q250 Mr Campbell: Is it becoming less of a problem because the police were contacted and took a very robust approach to the pursuance of those who were carrying out this activity?

Mrs Carruthers: Certainly, police in certain areas where it was becoming a significant problem did take it on board to make it their business to talk to other local taxi firms and to try to cut it off. It has been raised by the local drug and alcohol co-ordination teams with whom we would work closely in relation to the Northern Ireland drug and alcohol strategy in the past. Taxis have been identified as a big source of alcohol to the under-aged. The local drug and alcohol teams would say that certain taxis, certain ice cream vans even, in particular areas would be a good source of alcohol. A taxi would deliver to a door, and an under-18 would open the door and say, "this is for my mum; she is just upstairs; hand over the money"; and the alcohol would change hands. It was a very easy way for the under-18s to get access to alcohol.

Q251 Chairman: Not alcoholic ice cream, surely!

Mrs Carruthers: Fish and chip vans are another one.

Q252 Mr Campbell: What about counterfeit alcohol?

Mrs Carruthers: That, again, is a big problem in Northern Ireland. I made reference earlier to the presentation we had from the police counterfeit team to our annual general meeting a couple of years ago. Counterfeit Smirnoff is the main problem in Northern Ireland. The counterfeiters are extremely adept at copying the bottle. Diageo actually changed the Smirnoff bottle about a year ago to try to keep a step ahead of the counterfeiters, but of course they have now caught up.

Q253 Chairman: They make this brew in Northern Ireland and put it in these kinds of bottles.

Mrs Carruthers: Yes. It is a big problem. People would have said in the past that counterfeit alcohol was being sold in pubs et cetera. I firmly believe that that is not a problem at all. The checks on the alcohol sold in pubs are so significant and stringent these days; it is not just Trading Standards officers that go round checking alcohol in pubs; it is the Environmental Health officers under the Food Standards Agency - quite rightly too! Specific testing kits have been developed in conjunction with the drinks companies, so it is now very easy for a Trading Standards or Environmental Health officer to check the validity of a product that is being sold across the counter. It is our understanding that the biggest problem with the counterfeit stuff is markets, door-to-door sales, and again the taxis. People think that they are getting a bargain if they are buying a bottle of Smirnoff for five pounds, but they are certainly not buying a bottle of Smirnoff.

Q254 Mr Campbell: The anecdotal evidence that I have heard would appear to suggest that there is quite a sophisticated operation. Have your members indicated the variety of sources that might be involved in such a sophisticated operation?

Mrs Carruthers: No, it is not something which I would have any specific information on. The level of sophistication was something that the police have told us about through factories, for want of a better word, that they have found in certain areas, which are manufacturing this counterfeit product. They are sophisticated operations. My members would tell me that they are not that often offered stuff these days. In the past there might have been a knock on the back door and someone was trying to sell them a dodgy product; but that is not a big problem these days because they know they are not going to take it. It is difficult to know exactly where it comes from but the police would tell us it is very, very sophisticated, which is why it is so difficult for legitimate companies to keep one step ahead of the counterfeiters.

Q255 Mr Campbell: If it is the case that most counterfeit alcohol is not going through legitimate channels and is reaching the general public through shebeens and illegal drinking establishments, and if those who are responsible for the formulation and distribution of counterfeit alcohol are extremely sophisticated - and I would assume they would need to work in areas where they are less likely to be detected - is there a possibility, probability, that there is a paramilitary link at some point in that chain?

Mrs Carruthers: I could not say. I could not say any more than anybody else in Northern Ireland could say, but the Committee would have to draw its own conclusions from the level of sophistication.

Q256 Chairman: Is it coming over the border?

Mrs Carruthers: From what the police tell us, a lot of it is based in Northern Ireland, around border areas.

Q257 Mr Campbell: You said the Committee should draw its own conclusions but what would be your best guess?

Mrs Carruthers: I honestly could not say.

Mr Campbell: What would your members' best guess be?

Q258 Chairman: She would have to ask them, would she not?

Mrs Carruthers: There is obviously a lot of sophistication involved but I couldn't go any further than that.

Mr Campbell: We can draw our own conclusions.

Q259 Meg Hillier: Ms Carruthers, you talked about not being able to be sure about the impact on your members. Do you have any figures showing the percentage of legitimate sales of alcohol in pubs and in your off-licence members over the years that would indicate whether it has gone up or down?

Mrs Carruthers: Off the top of my head I could not tell you precise figures. What I could tell you is that the general trend is towards a general decline in on-sales and a growth in off-sales. There has certainly been a growth in the off-sales trade in Northern Ireland and especially since the arrival of the supermarkets around ten years ago, so this trend would be mirrored across everywhere.

Q260 Meg Hillier: From that trend you could tell that difference. Is there any way you could look at those figures - or maybe even supply them - if you can you tell by monitoring that whether there has been an increase in illegal purchasing?

Mrs Carruthers: I think it would be difficult to draw that conclusion from the figures. The only figures we have been able to get on the level of counterfeit alcohol are figures that are UK-wide and they are pretty elderly figures; they are three or four years old now.

Q261 Chairman: Can I just ask a question that might be helpful to Mr Campbell and Meg Hillier: would it be feasible for you, following this session, to write to your members just to see how many of them had had what was called the knock on the back door for counterfeit alcohol in the last year and whether this represented an increase or a decrease in those approaches. I am not asking for names or locations, but it would be an answer to Mr Campbell's question, and indeed Meg Hillier's if you had some sort of indication from them.

Mrs Carruthers: Certainly.

Q262 Gordon Banks: I want to take you back to the point you made about bottling and that it all comes down to this level of sophistication. In my constituency I also have a major bottling plant, and bottle manufacturing in my constituency, so I can understand the difficulty. How do these people get these bottles? Are they stealing new bottles; are they stealing recycled bottles? They are surely not manufacturing bottles because it is such a complex operation! Is it organised that they are stealing bottles from Owens-Illinois?

Mrs Carruthers: I honestly could not tell you. I would not know at all. I know that they could be stealing them from people's back yards. They could be being sold to them - I do not know. I know that the vast majority of bottles are not returnable bottles these days, so they just go straight into the bottle bank and it is lifted by a glass manufacturer and recycled. I couldn't tell you where they get bottles from.

Lady Hermon: Nichola, you are very welcome here. It is a very interesting session, if I may say so. I am tasked to ask you about floor supervisors. Before I do so can I ask you about poteen: is it poteen manufacture still prevalent in Northern Ireland, particularly around the border areas? Is it a constituent used in the manufacture of Smirnoff or counterfeit Smirnoff?

Q263 Chairman: Can you tell the difference?

Mrs Carruthers: I honestly wouldn't know. One hears of Poteen but, to be honest - I think that would probably do less harm than a lot of the counterfeit Smirnoff.

Q264 Lady Hermon: Less harm?

Mrs Carruthers: Yes. A lot of the counterfeit Smirnoff - the big problem with a lot of counterfeit alcohol is that you simply don't know what is in it. We get warnings from Environmental Health officers from time to time that they have identified a certain consignment, for want of a better word, of an illegal alcohol that has got methane in or - really dangerous stuff in it. It is a dangerous product and it should not be out there. I really could not tell you about Poteen I am afraid.

Q265 Lady Hermon: Moving on to door supervisors, could you tell me about the numbers? I know it is moving from the ridiculous to the sublime. How representative are the door supervisors of the community in Northern Ireland in terms of gender? I do know that women bring a different much calmer atmosphere to pubs, and I would be interested to know how many women are employed.

Mrs Carruthers: There are apparently very few employed, probably less than 5% at the moment. It is something we are trying to change. The venues that do employ a large number of door supervisors are aware that they need to change. We are certainly getting a growing number of females coming through our training courses. It is very important that venues do have female door supervisors on. As you say, they bring a calming influence. One of the things we train them on is drugs awareness and how to find drugs. If you are planning on searching a woman you have got to have a woman doing it. It is very important, and the number of female door supervisors is growing. In the last couple of years, you are not talking about doubling every year - it would be an awful lot more than that. Five years ago you could probably count the number of female door supervisors on one hand. There is now still not nearly enough there is definitely a growing number, judging by the number of people we are now training.

Q266 Lady Hermon: That is very good news. Northern Ireland at present does not fall under the security industry agency. Would you like it to do so? Has the Federation actively campaigned for it to do so, and what would be the advantages if the SIA were to extend its remit to Northern Ireland?

Mrs Carruthers: We have not yet campaigned actively, apart from talking to local councils. We have been waiting until the whole thing has been up and running to see exactly how well it is working. It is about to extend its authority into Scotland, as far as I know. Door supervisors, five years ago, were entirely unregulated in Northern Ireland and they were completely untrained, but four years ago we worked with the British Inn-keeping Institute to develop a door supervisor course specifically for Northern Ireland, based very much on the GB version, but with differences for the different Northern Ireland legislative structure. We started off doing that in partnership with the local councils. Given that the people who employed door supervisors also had entertainment licences, which were granted by local councils, it seemed a sensible way of doing it. We also wanted to do it in partnership with the local drugs teams and local police, trying to make it as inclusive as possible. We started training in the west of Northern Ireland in Omagh, Eniskillen and up to Straban, because often our members would tell us we were too Belfast based, so we like to be as non-Belfast based as possible. We started off training them. Very early on we realised that there was going to be an issue in difference between training and registration, because the two things are very separate. We went and talked to the councils about this. It was quite clear that some councils just wanted their door supervisors to be trained and they did not want to get into anything to do with registration at all.

Q267 Lady Hermon: Why was that?

Mrs Carruthers: They knew there would be difficulties with registration because registration would involve police checks, and they wanted at that stage - they saw it as being more important that a critical mass were trained and able to deal with customers properly and able to carry out their duties properly; so they were properly trained and then they would tackle registration later on, as it were. The majority of councils have never touched the registration. It would tend to be councils in and around North Down, Belfast, that tackled registration, and, again, even then with those that do registration, they do it in different ways. For example, North Down have set up a local committee of licensees, the council and police, who vet the door supervisors and get their reference checks; and that body decides whether or not to get somebody registration. On the other side of the coin, you have the system in Belfast, which, I have to say, the members in Belfast do not like because Belfast require police checks to be taken of the door supervisors but that police check is then given back to the licensee and the licensee has to exercise their own judgment as to whether or not they want to employ that door supervisor. The reason we would like to see an SIA type body in Northern Ireland is that it would remove that difficulty from the licensee. There are times when licensees are encouraged to employ particular door supervisors.

Q268 Lady Hermon: Can you elaborate upon the word "encourage" - by whom?

Mrs Carruthers: There are a number of very good door supervisor firms, which are great, and an awful lot of licensees would employ people as employees and then just use them individually. There has been in the past a perception that organisations would have door supervisors that they would like to get on to premises.

Q269 Lady Hermon: Is it a reality though?

Mrs Carruthers: My members have never told me one way or another whether they have been persuaded or not, but what I can say is that a lot of members have said that they would like not to have to make their own judgment as to whether or not they employ someone; they would like to be able to point to a third party, saying, "I am sorry, I can't employ you because SIA says I cannot".

Q270 Lady Hermon: In other words, compulsory training and compulsory registration would be very helpful to the Federation or to your members.

Mrs Carruthers: Absolutely.

Q271 Lady Hermon: Before I leave this issue, can I ask you to clarify something in the evidence that you very kindly submitted to the Committee? Licensees can come under pressure to employ particular individuals (with paramilitary and/or criminal links) and in the absence of something akin to the SIA it would be difficult to refuse. Is that a localised Belfast issue; is it more to the west of the Province? Is it right across Northern Ireland? What could be done to address that?

Mrs Carruthers: We have heard about it in Belfast and in the west and north-west. We have not heard about it, to be honest, in other areas. What could be done would be something like the SIA or, at the very least, local councils putting down more stringent requirements in terms of who can or cannot be registered - taking not necessarily full responsibility but assisting their licensees in turning down applications for door supervisors rather than putting the full onus and burden back on the licensee.

Q272 Lady Hermon: Some local councils are but most are not; so you are really quite critical of local councils not giving you sufficient back-up and support that your members would like.

Mrs Carruthers: It has been surprising how many local councils in Northern Ireland have not even been interested in training door supervisors. That has been a surprise to us. In some ways it has been useful because being a small organisation at the moment we are training in those areas where we are wanted, and we have certainly got enough to do. Every single solitary door supervisor should be properly trained and registered; they absolutely should. A lot of the councils have been excellent. Our preferred mode of training the door supervisors is to work in partnership with the police, the councils, the local drug and alcohol teams and the local colleges. The door supervisors are getting to know people on the ground - the local police, the local council officials who are doing checks. That has really helped to improve standards and improve relations on the ground, and that has been excellent, especially in Eniskillen where it has worked very well. There are other areas where we train door supervisors but we just use a single trainer who can do the whole lot, because we know that there are naturally some people who would not attend training courses if there was police involvement, so we can accommodate everybody. Certainly our preferred mode of training is to use the inclusive method.

Q273 Chairman: Mr Fraser wants to move on to extortion. Would you rather he asked these questions in private at the end, or are you happy to take them now?

Mrs Carruthers: I can take them now because there is not really much I can say on it, so I am fine.

Q274 Mr Fraser: Thank you very much for your evidence! Next question! I appreciate you have made it clear that everyone is aware of it, and very little is talked about, but can you enlighten us as to the extent of the problem of extortion and how it affects your members in general terms?

Mrs Carruthers: It is even difficult for me to talk in general terms because in five years I have been at the Federation it is not something that has ever been discussed ever; it has just never raised its head. I have never had a member coming to me, asking me advice about it and to ask me to involve the police on their behalf. Often we would act as a go-between between members in certain areas and the police: if members do not want to contact the police directly, we will do it for them. I have never had any contact from any member on the issue of extortion.

Q275 Mr Fraser: I fully accept that. Sir Hugh Orde made it clear when he gave evidence to us that the biggest challenge that the police face is tackling extortion. He then went on to say: "There are huge opportunities for us in this field if we have the information up-front and we want to work in partnership with the victims to deliver." Therefore, what steps could be taken to encourage the reporting of extortion from these members you have that currently do not want to talk about it? What can happen in terms of a more open approach to the subject?

Mrs Carruthers: I think it would have to be something that was not seen to be driven by the police, perhaps some sort of impartial third party. I know that Crime Stoppers exists, but I genuinely think that a lot of people do not realise that Crime Stoppers is an independent charity and does not have links with the police. I know it has recently started an advertising campaign and that is long overdue. It is a very good thing.

Q276 Mr Fraser: Are you talking to them yourselves?

Mrs Carruthers: No, we have not. Business crime is obviously an issue for the whole business community. The Community Safety Unit at the Northern Ireland Office is trying to set up a group to look specifically at business crime. We had an initial meeting of that last week which was useful because the police were able to supply figures on the level of business crime across the board. It was a general feeling that it was woefully under-reported, just on the figures that we saw. It is not helpful to sit here and say it is very hard and we are not sure what can be done, but one of the biggest problems is that there is a big perception that this is going on, and those people who are suffering from it are fearful. That is the basic bottom line. People would be scared to report it. It will be a very long time before that can be overcome. Perhaps as the Assets Recovery Agency and the Organised Task Force become more visible and more work is done, that will allay fears to some extent, but it is a hugely difficult area.

Q277 Mr Fraser: Is that because of the repercussions from the organisations that are undertaking such activity, or is it because your members feel when they report to police that either it is not taken seriously, or they are dealing with it in a way that is less than efficient?

Mrs Carruthers: I cannot comment specifically on the extortion and what our members believe to be the case on extortion, and why they do not report it. On business crime per se a lot of them would not report it because they feel it is a waste of time.

Q278 Chairman: Do you have anonymous surveys of your members, questionnaires, that they feel in without necessarily having to say who they are? Do you assess feelings and views on that basis at all?

Mrs Carruthers: We have done that in the past, yes.

Q279 Chairman: Would you be able to do that in this area?

Mrs Carruthers: Yes.

Chairman: That would be extremely helpful and we would be grateful to you; it would be something we would be very interested in.

Q280 Mr Fraser: Can I go on from that point and ask you a question more generally about confidence? Is it your opinion that the increased sentencing for issues like extortion has brought a lot of confidence to your members in terms of thinking, "when people are found out for doing things, something will happen to them"? Has that improved the confidence of your members?

Mrs Carruthers: I think when people see stories in the news about various seizures that have been made and what is happening, that generally raises confidence across the board. Whether it would make an individual be more likely to report a case of extortion, I do not know. I think we are still a long way off that.

Q281 Mr Fraser: To keep it on the more general point, has the recent paramilitary organisation's decision to follow a peaceful means had a positive effect on members of your organisation in this respect?

Mrs Carruthers: It certainly had positive implications across the board because it has increased their business. The ghetto-isation that we had during the troubles does not happen as much. People are much happier to go into the town and city centres than they were before, and there is certainly a much better feeling across Northern Ireland since that. That has had a very positive effect on business.

Q282 Chairman: You have very kindly said you would do this little survey, but how do you normally consult your members? Do you have a series of meetings in the course of a year?

Mrs Carruthers: We are set up on a county structure. We have seven county associations, which is six counties plus Belfast. They send representatives to our board, and so we have the opportunity to speak to them on a county level. At least once a year we would try to get the whole membership together, but, like every membership organisation, we suffer from a great difficulty in getting people to come to things.

Q283 Chairman: We know about that!

Mrs Carruthers: We have done surveys to members in the past, which have been done either by phone or post or on the website.

Q284 Mr Hepburn: What changes do you think should be made to the licensing law to deter criminal activity?

Mrs Carruthers: None! As I mentioned previously, the proposed changes to Northern Ireland's licensing legislation will increase criminal activity. We certainly do not have a perfect system by any stretch of the imagination but we do not have a bad one. There is a genuine fear that the proposals that are there will increase criminal activity, or there is certainly the potential for criminal activity to be increased.

Q285 Mr Hepburn: Surely an organisation like yours supports something like the closure of businesses if they have been found to be involved in criminal activity.

Mrs Carruthers: Absolutely. We would not support criminal activity in any shape or form. Indeed, we changed our constitution a number of years ago to make it easier for us to expel any members that were found guilty of passing on or selling dodgy spirits or whatever. We want to represent legitimate interests.

Q286 Chairman: Have you expelled anybody?

Mrs Carruthers: Since we changed the rules we have not had to; it has been excellent.

Q287 Chairman: Did you before have to expel someone?

Mrs Carruthers: We did not have the power to expel.

Q288 Chairman: I see, so you did not have the power and when you had the power you ---

Mrs Carruthers: No, since we have had the bar, there have not been any convictions of our members.

Q289 Chairman: Did some leave?

Mrs Carruthers: One did. We then changed the constitution, but since then there have not been any convictions, so we have not had to.

Q290 Sammy Wilson: This might give me some idea of the extent within the trade: before you changed your rules would you have had many of your members convicted during that period of passing on counterfeit or stolen -----

Mrs Carruthers: It has never been a big issue amongst the membership, to be honest. Since I have been there, in five years, there has been one case. That was when we realised we had to change the constitution so that if this arose again in the future we would be able to cope with it. It just has not been an issue in five years that I have been there, and I am not aware it was a big issue before. There is a perception that it is an issue, but there really are an awful lot of checks that re done. I know that a number of licensees do have a difficulty with the manner in which checks are done by Trading Standards and Environmental Health officers. They tend to walk into premises that are busy at lunchtime and say, "I am from the Trading Standards; I am here to check your product". That is absolutely fine, but the word quickly gets round the town that somebody has been shopped, even though they are not.

Q291 Chairman: "I am from the Government; I have come to help you"!

Mrs Carruthers: Exactly. People think they must have been doing something wrong if they have come calling, rather than if being part of a series of calls. Anybody in the trade who is selling anything they should not be is exceptionally silly because they are going to be found out and they are only cheating the customer at the end of the day.

Q292 Rosie Cooper: Some organisations have given evidence to this Committee and have said that the police have not engaged and made enough attempts to engage with the business community, and that when they do they do not have enough resources. Sir Hugh Orde said he thought the situation was winnable, and that they could get there. You have touched on it briefly, but do you believe that the level of engagement in terms of resources and connections between the business community and the police is where it should be?

Mrs Carruthers: I do not think so. I am talking about when our members - for example, I spoke to one of our members who is a smallish chain of off-licences and I spoke to them just to get a feeling from them of the level of crime that they were facing on a day-to-day basis, and also how they felt the police response was, because they are a pretty well-known operation, so you would think the level of support would be pretty good. They told me that in the last year in Belfast in about 15 stores they have had 50 incidents of robberies and thefts. In one of those, the culprit was apprehended and that was because they stole a whole Securicor van. The comment that was made to me was that the police were not interested. I said, "can I quote you on that?" They said, "Absolutely". Again, the levels of criminal damage - windows being put in during the night, and doors being damaged - many people just would not bother to report it because the culprits are never going to get caught and it takes up their business time in waiting for scenes of crime officers to come, and they are probably not going to claim on the insurance and they do not need the crime number, so it just goes unreported. At the business crime meeting I attended last week, that was the pretty unanimous view around the table, and that the figures we were given by police about levels of business crime were woefully under-reported.

Chairman: Again, if you could do your own survey, that would be jolly interesting.

Q293 Rosie Cooper: Would the Federation have any ideas of how that relationship could improve?

Mrs Carruthers: It is slightly difficult. As a federation, we have good working relationships with police on a range of issues. Funnily enough, issues about crime we never talk to the police about, which seems odd; but there is just this general feeling that there is not a lot of point. When we did the last member survey 20% of people said they would not report or that they would not call for assistance - there was this view, "what's the point?" There seems to be an acceptance that there is a level of crime, and that it needs to be accepted. I would also say that certainly from work the Federation does with various community groups, again the pubs and off-licences would feel they are getting hammered a lot and blamed for under-age drinking, antisocial behaviour, et cetera. Therefore the work we do with the police is focused on that. We would also do the district police partnerships and police board, et cetera, doing their surveys, and quite rightly asking the population what they feel the police resources should be focused on. Again, you are getting under-age drinking, alcohol-related crime, social disorder, because the perception is that this is a huge problem; but the business community is not as good as it should be at sticking its head up and saying, "hold on; business crime is also a big problem that you should be focusing resources on". I do think that the business community has to take its blame in this as well, because it has not been as good as it should have been at sticking its hand up and saying "this is a problem for us as well".

Q294 Sammy Wilson: But, Nichola, is it fair to criticise the police if you are saying that of your members are under-reporting?

Mrs Carruthers: No, absolutely; that is what I am saying. The business community has to play its part in that, because it is not reporting things because it thinks there is no point. I also have to say that the vast majority of our members would agree that from their perspective the police are under-resourced. They know that they are not going to be top of the list in calling somebody out at two o'clock in the morning because there may only be two policemen on duty for a very large area. The police can only do so much.

Q295 Rosie Cooper: The Organised Crime Task Force is an agency that depends on referrals. Do you know of any occasion - and I am not asking you to nail it - where licensees have reported something to the police, which has then been referred on?

Mrs Carruthers: No, absolutely not. I do not believe that the Organised Crime Task Force has a very high public view in Northern Ireland. We have never had any dealings with them until I was called to the Committee. I certainly had not even looked at their website and I was even unaware of the organisations that made it up. The Asset Recovery Agency would have a pretty good -----

Q296 Chairman: We have done you a great service then!

Mrs Carruthers: But the Organised Crime Task Force has a pretty low profile.

Mr Grogan: I must confess, Chairman, that I met Ms Carruthers at lunchtime, in my role as the Chair of the Beer Group, and amongst other things I secured an invitation to the committee to have a tour of historic pubs in Belfast one summer's evening!

Chairman: You would certainly have a charming chaperone!

Q297 Mr Grogan: In relation to the proposed licensing changes, it has been reflected in the Committee that there is no political party that is supporting these changes. Can you put on the Committee's record what is proposed and where these changes have come from? They are not designed to cut crime; they came from very different motivations. The kernel of your argument is that they would have all sorts of unintended consequences on a whole range of issues. Is that right?

Mrs Carruthers: Yes. The Liquor Licensing Review was launched in Northern Ireland at the beginning of November and closed at the end of January, so it was held over the licensed trade's busiest time, which was difficult, to say the least.

Q298 Chairman: Governments are good at doing that!

Mrs Carruthers: Largely, the proposals would put the English licensing system into Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland's licensing system has always been very, very different from that of Great Britain, and the proposals would bring Northern Ireland completely into line with the licensing agreement, with one exception, and that is the whole issue around 24 hours; whereas Great Britain has 24 hours, or the potential for it, we are being given a shift from one o'clock in the morning to two o'clock in the morning. It is our belief that it will just shift one o'clock problems to two o'clock. The two main difficulties in the proposals for the licensed trade are the proposal to remove the surrender requirement, and that is the requirement whereby before opening a pub or off-licence you first have to purchase an existing licence. The surrender requirement has meant therefore that there is a cap on the number of liquor licences in Northern Ireland. We do not suffer the same level of over provision as in other areas. Our colleagues in Scotland would tell us that they have a very big problem of over-provision, and the number of licences in Scotland is four times per head of population what we have in Northern Ireland. The Government, as part of its Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency's Omnibus Survey, asked the population whether or not they thought that we had too many pubs and off-licences. There was a lovely comment in the consultation paper which said, "the majority of the population do not believe we are over provided with pubs or off-licences. Reading that, you would think we need some more, but what the survey actually said was 50% thought it was exactly the right number; 46% think we have got too many and only 3% thought there were too few; so only 3% of the population want more. As I said, none of the political parties want to get rid of this very tightly regulated system that we have, and what is being proposed is basically complete deregulation, getting rid of the surrender requirement and moving responsibility for granting licences to local councils, as is the case in Scotland and in England.

Q299 Chairman: This should clearly be a matter left to the Northern Ireland Assembly, when it finally meets -----

Mrs Carruthers: Absolutely. There is overwhelming opposition to this in Northern Ireland, so we are very much hoping the Minister will listen to that as he is bringing his response.

Q300 Mr Fraser: On the point you made to Rosie Cooper about reluctance to report crime, is there any evidence that the cost of crime is being passed on to the consumer, i.e. - and this is the information point you made - are the unit costs for alcohol more expensive in Northern Ireland as a consequence than they are in the rest of the United Kingdom, for example?

Mrs Carruthers: Any costs from crime will be passed on in some shape or form. I am not aware that the cost of alcohol in pubs in Northern Ireland is any more expensive than in the rest of the UK. Obviously, costs vary depending on the pub. The costs will be passed on, just as rates costs are passed on, and our much higher insurance costs that we have in Northern Ireland. It would probably have an effect at the margins.

Q301 Lady Hermon: Nichola, I would just like to ask one question to know your view - and the Federation view as well. You said on a couple of occasions that a small group of pub owners would not be happy to involve the PSNI, and on another occasion you referred to the sensitivities of some people in reporting crime; and you said, in response to Christopher's questions, that there is a reluctance to complain to the police. Do you think, and would the Federation be of the view, that it would be changed if Sinn Fein were to join the policing board, and urge other people from a Republican background to join the police? Would that have a significant change in the attitude of Federation members to reporting crime generally?

Mrs Carruthers: I am not sure about the change from Federation members per se but from my own view I would have thought it would because if Sinn Fein did join the policing board it would be my view that there would be an awful lot more confidence across the whole of Northern Ireland in reporting crime.

Q302 Chairman: You have, if I may say so, been an exemplary witness, and we congratulate you on fielding everything on your own. All the others have had assistance and sidekicks, but you have faced it all. We are very grateful to you for saying that you will do a survey because that will be helpful to us. We are not asking you to divulge names or even locations, but an indication would be helpful because we want to make a constructive report. We talked several times about the business community, of which you are a part, collectively, and individually your members; do you have a lot of participation in bodies like CBI, the Federation of Small Businesses and so on?

Mrs Carruthers: From time to time.

Q303 Chairman: Are you affiliated to any of them?

Mrs Carruthers: Not formally, no, but we would discuss and meet on matters of equal and joint concern.

Q304 Chairman: So you will be familiar with Mr Mitchell, one of our earlier witnesses, from the Federation? Yes. Are there any final questions from colleagues, or is there a final point you would want to make?

Mrs Carruthers: I do not think there is anything more I would like to say - just thank you very much for your time. Hopefully, whatever I have said has been useful.

Chairman: Extremely. Thank you very much indeed for coming. Thank you for what you are going to do. There may be some written questions we will send to you; and equally there may be points when you go back and think, "I wish I had dealt with that", so if that is the case, please feel free to write to the Clerk. We look forward to the beer tour with you later in the year!