Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by the Southport Partnership (CT 17)

1.  INTRODUCTION

  The Southport Partnership has been an integral part of the regeneration of the resort of Southport for over eight years. It is the conduit through which some £80 million of investment in Southport has been supported. It has had direct responsibility for both Regional Development Agency monies and for ERDF monies via its current Action Plan.

  The Partnership has a small executive team managed by a 15 person Board consisting of five community representatives, five private sector stakeholders and five public sector representatives.

  Because the Partnership originally was initially focused on social and economic improvements using SRB funding and is now involved with major public realm schemes using ERDF and NWDA monies it has developed a very sophisticated understanding of the inter relationships between all the various elements needed to make a coastal town more successful and to engender a long term sustainable improvement in investment and growth.

2.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  Ten years ago Southport was an almost typical example of a coastal town in long, slow, shabby and genteel decline. Lack of investment and maintenance had damaged private sector confidence and the town was looking tired. It had lost competitive advantage.

  Over the last 10 years this situation has been turned around. Briefly, a new sea wall unlocked the investment potential of our seafront, we renovated the pier, built a new bridge, brought in business and community support schemes and are continuing to improve our town through an Action Plan which included major public realm improvements and the improvements to our conference and hotel offers.

  We have maximised the opportunities given to us by Objective One and the Government Office for the North West and have matched these monies wherever possible with North West Development Agency resources and those of Sefton Council, which has led to a significant boost in private sector confidence and investment.

  The key concerns now facing the coastal town of Southport are:

    —  Encouraging and maintaining private sector confidence and investment.

    —  Having a skilled work force & ensuring that educational attainment is driven to at least standard UK levels.

    —  Affordable housing and accommodation, ensuring that we are a sustainable community.

    —  Increasing the scale of cultural investment.

    —  Integrating matters of health and human well-being more effectively into overall strategies.

    —  Bringing in sufficiently high service standards to the tourism sector which has a tradition of being dominated by the small owner/manager scale of business.

    —  Understanding the impact of migrant workers on our economy and community relations.

    —  Recognise that the leisure/tourist sector has an enormous (and growing) impact on GDP and as such needs more targeted political support.

  There is a huge library of strategies and studies to further the statements made in this submission but we have decided to aim for readability and to focus on the key issues rather than including tables and data.

3.  PRIVATE SECTOR CONFIDENCE AND INVESTMENT

  Coastal towns with problems are too easily characterised as resorts with ageing stocks of hotels, ageing populations and low levels of investment. They will only attract new investment when they can demonstrate to the private sector that there are good returns for any investment they make (concomitant with risk).

  Coastal towns are generally denied access to major sectors of the economy—Southport has seen a significant decline in manufacturing, its lack of Motorway access removes it from the warehousing/logistics sector. Southport is by its very nature, faced with both natural barriers and opportunities. It was built as a private sector speculation to service the cities of Manchester and Liverpool and all the cotton and mining towns of Lancashire. This gives it an enormous catchment population of around 10 million within a two hour drive-time.

  However if there are structural barriers to our access to the 20th century's industries there are real reasons for optimism in the 21st. Coastal towns can be very pleasant places to live and work. New IT based industries can be located anywhere, the information highway is of equal importance to the motorway.

  Resort towns can also take advantage of the changing holiday market—just as they lost out to the package holiday boom they can now gain ground in the second and third holiday market (the week away or long week-end break). This market is steadily growing, Southport hotel rack rates are now at a premium on a week-end rather than during the Monday to Friday period. This reflects the lack of commercial travelling that now is drawn to Southport.

  The retail sector has seen changes. Southport's second biggest trading day is now Sunday—again this is contrary to the patterns expected in more central urban areas.

  Hotel stock and services are generally poor and reflect the decades of under investment. Southport is not alone in this, Blackpool being an even bigger example. Customers now expect better standards in both the physical state of their hotels and the quality of service. The opportunity is opening up for good quality 3 and 4 star hotels to be built and they will have first call on the customers. The commercial traveller type client is, in Southport's case, being replaced by the visitor and the conference delegate.

  This change will lead to the demise of a significant number of the small hotels in the town over the next 20 years—bringing with it a (admittedly worst case) scenario of having a town centre with a large number of failed hotels converted into sub-standard Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO's).

  Coastal towns future's lie in tourism investment, workforce and management skills and their promotion as a great place to live and work (as opposed to just visit). In addition they need to attract investment from the new IT and Web based industries on the basis that the lifestyle offered by a coastal town is a viable alternative to a more urban centres such as the cities of Liverpool and Manchester.

  Southport has seen, through the public sector investment programmes, a return of private sector confidence with major investments beginning to be made without public sector grants. The fragility or otherwise of this confidence is not yet understood and there is still a substantial need for ongoing funding in areas where the private sector is reluctant or unable to engage eg investment in cultural assets and in key public spaces such as Lord Street "the finest shopping boulevard in the UK".

4.  A SKILLED WORKFORCE

  Coastal towns are traditionally seen as visitor destinations with a plethora of jobs in the leisure/retail/caring sectors. These are immediately characterised as low paid and unchallenging with little scope for personal development and as such do not attract the best talent.

  There is a failure of substantial parts of these industries to engage in the long term process of training and improvement of staff skills (again a reflection of the negative attitude many owner-managed businesses have towards training).

  Southport has a strategy called the "Classic Resort". In developing the strategy exemplars have been given. Interestingly, the most potent comparisons are not with UK coastal towns but with the classic resort towns in Europe, eg Deauville, Le Touquet, Baden Baden.

  Looking at these towns and their workforces reinforces the view that they [our European cousins] take these sectors far more seriously, they see employment in the service sector as a real profession and employers see real value and returns in training staff to high standards.

  There is a strong belief that to develop our workforce of the future we need to be promoting the careers and opportunities open in our local economy at an earlier stage in the education cycle. Like all such issues we cannot promote a positive attitude unless the opportunities presented are real. This then turns full circle back to the attitude of the service sector employers to training and staff development.

5.  MIGRANT WORKERS

  In Southport over 600 new jobs have been created (with more to come) over the last eight years in the leisure/retail sectors. We (the Southport Partnership) were very concerned that, in a period of structural full employment, we would be unable to fill the vacancies. We investigated options for enabling areas like Bootle with its high levels of unemployment accessing the new jobs to little effect.

  The private sector has solved the problem by the employment of migrant workers. The migrants have been successful in getting these jobs because they are perceived as being better motivated and effective employees than those available in the workless resident pool in Southport.

  This means that current workless residents have been presented with an additional barrier to employment and will therefore need more training than previously to compete in the market.

  Job Centre+ have reported that they have seen over 400 jobs "disappear" from their books—they believe this is because employers are now directly hiring migrant workers.

  We are currently engaged with Sefton MBC in carrying out a detailed study of the impact of migrant workers on Sefton and on Southport in particular. This piece of work will be completed in the first half of 2006.

6.  HOUSING AND ACCOMMODATION

  Coastal towns are often (and it is certainly the case in Southport) a mix of expensive private sector houses, often occupied by retirees, a mix of mid range private ownership properties, flats, and HMO's.

  Southport is a housing "hot spot". Affordable housing for our workforce is becoming more and more limited, particularly for people engaged in our traditional sectors.

  Southport has only a small stock of public sector housing which means that a lot of private sector housing is subject to market forces. The influx of migrant workers has meant that the private sector can obtain higher than previous income levels which impacts on the amount of affordable rental properties available to local residents.

  In the longer term we face the combined problems of a lack of affordable housing for our workforce and a (probably shorter term) dependency on migrant labour, yet we need to sustain both economic growth and a cohesive community

  The Southport Housing Strategy Forum (made up of the LA, 7 Housing Associations and other engaged bodies, including the Partnership) is carrying out detailed research and planning further submissions to the Housing Corporation targeted at bringing resources to bear on this problem.

7.  HEALTH MATTERS

  Southport has a larger proportion of people aged 45 and over than for England as a whole. The increasing numbers of older members of the community will mean a rising prevalence of long-term conditions such as heart disease and dementia and health and social services need to take this into account.

  The projected decrease in people of working age is critical in terms of providing community support and the economic well-being of the area. In 2003 there are 58 dependents for every 100 people of working age. This is projected to change to 76 dependents for every 100 potentially economically active people in 2028.

  Employment and the type and quality of the work has a significant impact on long term health needs. If we can shift the status and remuneration levels in the resort's jobs we will see a significant reduction in health problems.

  The resort attracts seasonal and migrant workers with their own health and social needs and we need to engage with these hard-to-reach groups in order to maintain a proper balance between health needs and resources.

  In coastal towns there is an additional requirement on health resources. For example, Southport has a population of circa 90,000. but has over 6 million visitors per year and can have hundreds of thousands of visitors for one-off events and festivals. There is a need to take this into account when resourcing coastal resort towns. The walk-in centres so familiar from holidays to the Med are needed in towns such as Southport.

8.  GEOGRAPHY

  Southport, like most coastal towns, are destinations at the end of the line. They rarely benefit from passing through traffic and as such can be poorly served by rail and road routes.

  Infrastructure improvements are needed to make them easily reachable for the short holiday/day visitor market. A direct and efficient train link from the catchment areas to the coastal resort will re-open the market.

9.  RETAIL

  The growth of shopping malls of enormous scale and with highly convenient access are having a deleterious effect on the retail offer in Southport. We are steadily slipping down the retail league tables in terms of rental rates and in terms of the breadth of retail offer.

  Southport has always prided itself on the range of quality independent retailers—we are not "any cloned high street, anywhere". One of the legacies of this is that our retail units are by and large too small to interest major chain stores. There is a real need to implement a retail strategy that changes this situation.

  Southport has a fine retail Boulevard—Lord Street, with canopied shops along one side of its tree lined one mile length and fine gardens on the other. However it needs to be competitive with other retail centres to maintain its offer of both being a seaside resort destination and a quality retail centre.

  There needs to be put in place a clear strategy of encouraging the investment by quality brands and chains whilst balancing this with the specialist shops that separate our offer from the norm.

10.  HERITAGE AND CULTURE

  Like most coastal towns Southport has inherited some significant (and in their day expensive and leading edge) buildings and open spaces, such as civic buildings, parks and marine lakes.

  Whilst it has proved relatively straightforward to approach funding agencies for some heritage sites it can be highly problematic for others. In Southport's case we have successfully pursued Heritage Lottery and European funds for some improvements but where a key asset falls outside the targets set either by the EU or the UK government then severe problems arise. In Southport's case we are bringing about significant regeneration improvements to our seafront but they surround a 48 hectare lake ( the largest man made marine lake in the UK) which is in dire need of improvement. It is silted, unkempt in many places and no longer the asset it was when our Victorian forbearers developed it for the town.

  Because the outputs do not fit those required by either ERDF or the NWDA we cannot access sufficient funds to do the necessary remedial works. Marine Lakes and sea fronts with promenades, piers and sea walls are what make UK coastal towns different, to build some of these assets from new would cost astronomical sums but to bring the existing structures up to an acceptable condition is entirely feasible.

  Equally, there are civic buildings which house significant cultural assets, libraries, museums, art galleries and theatres. Given the geography of coastal towns they are often isolated from regional cultural centres. In Southport's case one has to go to the cities of Preston, Manchester or Liverpool to enjoy the best cultural offers. However, cultural assets serve not only their local communities but also the visitor. All too often they are the missing piece in the offer of coastal towns—and one only has to look at the Tate at St Ives to see the impact such assets can have on a coastal town.

  Southport's art gallery, theatre and library are all in desperate need of remodelling, refurbishing and development. The local Council has stoically maintained its acquisitions budget throughout the years of cut-backs, but it faces real problems over the quality, access to and content of its exhibition and performance spaces.

11.  WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOESN'T

11.1  Take a long term view

  In Southport we have successfully addressed some of the key social issues, formalising community and voluntary sector engagement, increasing community engagement in decision making whilst substantially lacking progress in other areas, eg the quality and availability of private sector housing. It is interesting to note that in 1895 it was reported that affordable housing was a problem for the local workers—as it still is today.

11.2  Building confidence

  The Objective One programme for Merseyside gave us a one-off chance to invest public monies in the pursuit of private sector investor confidence. We have always understood that sustainability was the key to maximising the benefits on offer from the ERDF and ESF up to 2008. Regeneration works most effectively when the investment is made in towns and communities where a foundation of entrepreneurial skills already exist.

  The use of public monies to engender a sea-change in private sector investor confidence has been a considerable success. The very visible physical improvements have led to a significant increase in private sector investment, with new shopping parks, apartments, leisure offers and hotels all either being built or demonstrating a serious level of commitment at the time of writing.

  However, it has to be noted that Southport is an entrepreneurial town—it has a clear understanding that it is betting its future largely on the visitor/tourist segment of the economy, which is sensible since this is the segment of the economy it has the most experience of

11.3  Partnership Working

  Real and effective partnership working is one of the cornerstones of our success. Influential members of the community, public and private sectors—real stakeholders in the town's future—can add value to the process by bringing their skills and experiences to bear on dealing with both the opportunities and the problems that regenerating a coastal town throws up.

  The Southport Partnership has been in existence for over eight years through successive regeneration programmes and this long term stability has paid dividends in enabling the Board to keep a whole range of measures and interventions on target.

  The Partnership has always used other agencies to deliver its programmes—thus avoiding a bloated executive team and making transition from programme to programme easier and (critically) easier to fund.

  Good partnership working engenders itself in others, Local Authority departments have readily developed a much closer liaison with each other to work at delivering projects on a team basis—often across traditional internal barriers.

12.  WHAT DOESN'T WORK

12.1  Need for transparency in funding

  Lack of clarity from Regional Development Agencies as far as their investment commitments are concerned. To change the future path of a town takes time and money. In our experience it is clear that a 10-15 year strategy is the minimum needed to bring real change. Whilst it is impossible for any RDA to make a commitment over that long a term, a clearly funded plan of investment for the first five years of the strategy would enable towns to plan effectively.

  This investment commitment must be made transparently—lets have the pain up front and work with what we know we will get rather than a "jam tomorrow" approach.

AND FINALLY

  This submission to the Coastal Towns Inquiry has been made by the Southport Partnership because we believe our extensive (and successful) experience in playing our part in revitalising Southport may be of use to the ODPM in its deliberations.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 18 April 2006