Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by Mr Michael Clare (AH 03)

  I am a retired Police Officer of 30 years service and am currently employed as a civilian employee by Thames Valley Police as a Crime Prevention Design Adviser. The particular parts of the enquiry that I am interested in are:

    1.  The extent to which home purchase tackles social and economic inequalities and reduces poverty.

    2.  Other factors influencing the affordability of housing for sale including construction methods and fiscal measures.

  I would like to make the following submission:

    Sustainability is a key factor especially the need for residents to feel safe and secure in their home environment. This aids social cohesiveness by reducing the fear of crime. At the present time building regulations do not cover the security of dwellings. However its safety and security can be achieved by the implementation of the Home Office and Chief of Police Officers (ACPO) Secured By design Award.

  1.  Often on reports submitted to Planning Departments regarding various applications, I am also making mention of access control to blocks of flats, and securing the rear garden etc, etc. These items I mention because they affect the security of a dwelling and thus make it more sustainable, and reduce the fear of crime for residents and users. However the planning departments do not see these as planning issues and the hope is the developer will be a responsible citizen and include them in the build of the development should it succeed in gaining planning permission. However unfortunately not all developers are responsible citizens and look to save money by building to the cheapest specification, (ie the cheapest windows, doors and locks, etc).

  The Council have control over the trees on a site, the bricks and roofing tiles that are used, the road layout, etc, but appear to have no control over what standard of windows and doors will be fitted, or they appear to not wish to have. I have even seen plans where developers list the colour of the windows and guttering but no mention about security.

  2.  PPS 1 which was published in February 2005, says about "Delivering Sustainable Development":

    (a)  para 27 (ii)—Promote urban and rural regeneration to improve the well being of communities, improve facilities, promote high quality and safe development and create new opportunities for people living in those communities. . .

    (b)  para 27 (iii)—Promote communities which are inclusive, healthy, safe and crime free. . .

    (c)  para 36—create safe and accessible environments where crime and disorder of fear of crime does not undermine quality of life or community cohesion. . .

    (d)  para 34—Good design should contribute positively to making places better for people. Design which is inappropriate in its context, or which fails to take the opportunities available for improving the character and quality of an area and the way it functions, should not be accepted.

    (e)  para 37—In planning for the achievement of high quality and inclusive design, planning authorities should have regard to good practice set out in:

    By Design—Urban design in the planning system: towards better practice;

    By Design—better places to live;

    Safer Places—The Planning System and Crime Prevention; . . .

  3.  Quoting from page 34 of "Safer Places—The Planning System and Crime Prevention", "The `Secured By Design' initiative offers in-depth advice on physical protection as part of a broad approach to designing out crime. It also sets out technical standards for building security . . . it forms an essential part of the crime prevention toolkit".

  3.1  Part of my role as a Crime Prevention Design Advisor for Thames Valley Police is to deal with applications for the "Secured By Design" award which is to advise the applicant on development layout, what is required as regards the build quality, (all with a view to designing out the potential for crime to occur) and visit the premises just prior to completion and inspect for issue of the certificate. This award is applied for by Housing Associations and Councils for all new and refurbished social housing. The award is supported by the Mortgage Corporation that lends money to Housing Associations to build new & refurbish existing dwellings by requiring them to try and achieve the award. For information the "Secured By Design" award is run nationally by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO).

  3.2  My colleagues and I would like to see private housing apply for the award but unfortunately this is a rarity and unfortunately there is now a disparity between private and social housing as regards the build quality, with private housing invariably built to a lesser standard. This is a social inequality and is contrary to the inclusive planning policies of the new planning policy statements and good practise guidance in documents such as "By Design Urban design in the planning system" which require that affordable and open market dwellings should not be distinguishable from each other and it is the policy of Thames Valley Police not to discriminate against any section of the community on the basis of their housing type. Yesterday I went to see a developer about the Secured By Design Award for the Social Housing on a new site, but they did not wish it for the rest of the development. Experience and having inspected other sites previously, tells me that the standard of windows and doors will be to a lesser standard to that in the Social Housing.

  3.3  On page 49 of the document "Safer Places—The Planning System and Crime Prevention", under Planning application stage it says, "All planning applications should demonstrate how crime prevention measures have been considered." Although it is a rarity for an applicant to consider crime prevention measures.

  4.  From the above it is clear that ODPM sees crime as an issue to be addressed at the planning stage. In fact section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 requires all local authorities to exercise their functions with due regard to their likely effect on crime and disorder, and do all they reasonably can to prevent crime and disorder. Whereas Planning Inspectors when conducting planning appeals were not bound by this section which caused problems in the past, it is my understanding that they have been told it now applies to them as well.

  5.  The document "Safer Places—The Planning System and Crime Prevention" which was published in March 2004, is not solely about crime prevention. It is about making places that are safer, but also better in a number of ways. This means it is concerned with the promotion of safe, sustainable and attractive environments that meet the full set of planning objectives.

  6.  In the "Draft South East Plan Part 1: Core Regional Policies—July 2005", says: "2.8 Design Quality—The importance of high quality design is emphasised in national planning policy (PPS 1), which encourages local authorities to establish clear design policies and principles. The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) plays a key role in raising design standards by raising awareness, disseminating good practice and developing professional skills in relation to design. The Assembly is working closely with them. Further sources of guidance and good practice are listed in Box BE1 overleaf." I reproduce this box below:

    As can be seen the documents: Safer Places-The Planning System and Crime Prevention; & By Design-Better Places to live; are mentioned, besides being mentioned in PPS.1

  7.  What I would like to see is a requirement for the build quality of dwellings to be to the Secured By Design award standard. Thus the build quality would be the same throughout, with no particular part of the community being prejudiced against. Also because windows, doors etc are to be to the relevant British Standard as specified in the award scheme, the building is more durable. This is why Housing Associations require the built quality of their new homes to be to the Secured By Design (SBD) standard.

  7.1  To achieve the Secured By Design Award the build quality has to be to the specification detailed, although there is room for negotiation for site layout. Thus I do not believe there would be any conflict between Planning Departments and Urban Design, but there would be an improvement in the quality of the built form which is something we all should be trying to achieve. Crime and its effects do affect the sustainability of an area. Also by getting this part right, reduces the opportunity for the would be thief to commit crime, which also has an effect on Policing of an area and allows more time for crime that is committed, to be investigated by the Police. Also the profile of an area would be raised and an increased desire for the public to want to live in that part.

  7.2  Because Business Crime is high within the Thames Valley Police Area I would like to see a similar requirement for new and refurbished factory and office developments. Again developers normally only want to build a basic shed type warehouse with offices attached to the cheapest specification and leave the matter of security to the firm that lease the premises. Invariably these firms have to compete with very low profit margins and do not have the money to retrospectively fit windows to the relevant British Standard with laminated glass fitted to all ground floor windows and those easily accessible above or below ground floor level or windows designated as emergency egress routes, etc. If however the build quality of the premises were built initially or refurbished to the Secured By Design award standard, this would make the premises more resistant to crime and make the premises more desirable for firms to take up leases, which in turn may well improve the employment situation in a given area.

    The Secured By Design Award is about making dwellings and business premises secure in ways that are not obvious. No one wants to see the fortress mentality which appears in some high crime areas, which only generates an even greater fear of crime.

  8.  The above approach has been successfully achieved in various local authority areas around the Country, and I have attached a couple of the quarterly Secured By Design Newsletters which give a couple of them. I have also attached in pdf format the application form for residential and commercial premises which gives a quick checklist guide, although the web site for Secured By Design which is: www.securedbydesign.com gives fuller details about the various design guides. The application check list also details the site layout, as well as the built form, but I am only concerned in promoting to you the built form.

  9.  For information the following is the actual wording used by Manchester City Council when attaching a SBD Condition to planning permission—

    "The Development hereby approved shall incorporate measures to minimise the risk of crime and to meet the specific security needs of the application site and the development. Any security measures to be implemented in compliance with this condition shall seek to achieve the `Secured by Design' accreditation awarded by the Greater Manchester Police. Written confirmation of those measures are to be provided to the City Council, as the local planning authority. Reason—In pursuance of the Council's duty under section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 to consider crime and disorder implications in exercising its planning functions; to promote the well being of the area in pursuance of the Council's powers under section 2 of the Local Government Act 2000, and to reflect the guidance contained in PPS1 `Delivering Sustainable Development'".

  If Planning Departments were to condition that the physical protection as part of a broad approach to designing out crime was to Secured By Design standards, this would not be too prescriptive. As British Standards change due to EU directives and also change due to advances in technology the standard could be kept up to date by the Secured By Design scheme.

  I believe the above is important regarding the sustainability of any area and for a better living environment for all residents and workers. With the pressure on house building at present and for the foreseeable future there will be a substantial increase in workload for the Police and thus the above will help make an area more sustainable.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 20 March 2006