Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by the North West Fire and Rescue Management Board (FRS 06)

REGIONAL CONTROLS AND FIRELINK

  The North West Fire and Rescue Management Board acknowledges that there is a clear requirement within the National Framework to deliver the transition to Regional Control Centres. There are genuine concerns over several aspects of the project detailed below. The Authority believe that improving clarity in these areas would improve the potential to work with Government to secure the promised improvements to service delivery. These areas are:

Governance and procurement

  The draft national framework identifies that governance arrangements for the RCC will be in place by Spring 2006. The new entity would then enter into a contract for mobilising services with each FRS. Current guidance indicates that there is an issue as to whether European Directives will require a tendering process with a mandate to select the cheapest or the most economically advantageous option. If this is the case and Authorities proceed without a tendering exercise, the decision to contract with the RCC would be capable of being challenged with unacceptable delays being potentially introduced from even anonymous sources. Leading views would indicate that these problems may not be easily resolved. The North West is seeking to raise awareness to support the transition to RCCs by ensuring these issues receive early consideration and options for the resolution of such issues are identified.

Costs

  There is a clear need to demonstrate that this project represents value for money for people in the North West. The business case has so far been based nationally, with indications that the larger existing control centres predominating in the North West will be advantaged less. The North West Fire and Rescue Management Board would benefit from having clarity and reassurance on when it will be provided with evidence that efficiency savings will offset the resources and time committed to the project since inception. There are indications that additional costs incurred will only be covered by "new burdens" once they have been offset against any benefits that may be accrued. If this were to be the case surely these benefits cannot then be used to justify the viability of the Project.

  The RCC Finance Working Group has been well supported by the North West. Recent developments would indicate that "value engineering" is varying the original specification, reducing the cost to the central project. The North West is concerned over clarity regarding the costs and rationale for these changes. Fundamental questions on project governance are raised when the ODPM make changes to a technical specification that they have previously deemed essential without consultation with Fire and Rescue Authorities or their representatives. If an item such as compliance with the Critical National Infrastructure is removed, then the potential exists that the remaining facility may be over specified and the leaseholder (and ultimately Fire and Rescue Authorities) left paying for functionality or resilience that is unnecessary. There is currently no independent scrutiny of the rationale and detail over how the cost savings for the ODPM are determined. These decisions ultimately affect the management of risk for the new RCC. To secure robust arrangements the North West would also urge early consideration of insurance arrangements for the new RCCs. An apparent saving on building costs may not even offset the increased potential insurance costs making it impossible to view these issues in isolation.

Human resources

  The North West Fire and Rescue Management Board has a high level of commitment to all the constituent Authorities staff. The National Project has been slow to determine several key issues to allow progress with the Human Resources issues essential to support our staff through this difficult transition. The Board urges early progress on selection, terms and conditions, pay, relocation expenses and redundancy. It is recognised that many of these issues are linked to the new governance model for regional control centres. However management and staff are becoming increasingly frustrated at the lack of progress in these areas.

Timescales/quality

  There have been several examples of slippage in the project so far. It is difficult to reassure the public and staff that the proposed improvements to efficiency and effectiveness will be delivered when delays have been a feature of the FiReControl Project to date. The project would benefit from being more explicit on the guaranteed improvements that will be delivered and guarantees that these will not be sacrificed if the project faces financial pressures as it approaches completion. The project would also benefit by ensuring that robust commissioning and testing arrangements for the technical solutions are put in place given the crucial role of mobilising in service delivery.

FIRELINK

  North West Fire and Rescue Authorities are becoming increasingly concerned with the proposed interim solution regarding feasibility and possible loss of functionality during the period involved. If problems are experienced with the first tranche of RCCs there is every potential that the second tranche which includes the North West will be delayed. This could result in the interim solution with its temporary loss of functionality being extended to six months or over. We would urge early consideration of this issue to ensure that essential response standards are not compromised. As this could be mission critical particularly during a terrorist attack this requires urgent attention.

DIVERSITY

  All North West Fire and Rescue Authorities have fully embraced the Fire and Rescue Service reform agenda and have through their Integrated Risk Management Planning process, placed significant additional resources into prevention and protection services, facilitated by the release of resources from emergency response service. There has been a significant reduction in the recruitment of wholetime operational firefighters as a direct result. The effect of this is that Authorities have been unable to make any real impact with respect to increasing diversity among its operational workforce. It is worth noting, however, that by increasing prevention and protection capability through the employment of non-operational uniformed Community Fire Safety staff, Authorities have successfully recruited a significant number from under-represented groups, ie women and black and minority ethnic community members.

  In light of the above, it would make sense for the current diversity targets not to be restricted to uniformed operational staff but should be expanded to include all uniformed staff engaged in service delivery, whether those staff fulfil an operational role or not. As the goal is for the Service to reflect the communities we serve the visual perspective is a fundamentally important one. Therefore seeing more Fire and Rescue Service staff from under represented groups out and about in the community will help achieve that objective.

INSTITUTIONAL REFORM

  The Board notes the Government's current position regarding progress in the area of institutional reform. With regard to national consultation and negotiation arrangements (as outlined in the 2003 Pay and Conditions Agreement), however, the Board wishes to urge the Government to set a final date for new arrangements to be in place, following which the Government should impose a solution, if no negotiated outcome is forthcoming.

WORKING WITH OTHER EMERGENCY SERVICES

  In the North West the arrangements with the two other blue light emergency services are very effective particularly for operational responses. The NW resilience plans are robust as a result of effective Major Incident Planning Committees in all Authorities.

  The Board notes the Government's recent statement regarding Fire and Rescue Services in a regional context. However the Board is aware of on-going consultation in relation to the restructuring of other emergency services. The Board therefore requests that the Government provides further clarity as to how those other restructures will impact on Fire and Rescue Services as it is necessary to have close co-operation plans in place with other emergency services and this re-organisation is a potential threat to effective joint working. There is clear evidence of the three Services working better together in such areas currently.

  There is also a great deal of evidence of effective joint working on Community Safety agendas across the North West which could potentially be jeopardised especially in the area of successful youth engagement with disaffected/disadvantaged youngsters.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 23 March 2006