Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by Ken Yeo, County Councillor Perranporth Electoral Division,

Executive Member—Public Protection (FRS 12)

  As Portfolio Holder with responsibilities for Cornwall County Fire Brigade I would offer the following submission to the Select Committee examining the proposals for nine Regional Fire Controls. I took responsibility for this Portfolio in May of this year following the County Council Elections, I have spent some time in listening and reading a great deal of literature on the project and its objectives. I have attended a Stakeholder meeting held at Taunton when elected Members and Chief Fire Officers from the South West Region were given a presentation on the Project prior to the announcement of the location.

  There are a number of issues I would request the Select Committee gives serious consideration to:

    1.  To what extent did the Team working on this Project understand the operations of an operational Fire Control and why, despite being invited to attend a number of Emergency Controls, did it decline to do so? Many of the smaller Fire Controls in predominantly rural authorities have operators with local knowledge and expertise, much of which will not be transferable to a Regional Control.

    2.  Is too much reliance being placed on untested and single system technology such that even a short interruption could have catastrophic consequences to the Region and public involved in an incident where seconds are vital? There appears to be no back up and total reliance that another Regional Control would take over and manage.

    3.  Why does it appear that "Big is Beautiful" is being pursued, a "One size fits all", when there are many brigades with unique problems peculiar to their own Authority? The population spread in Cornwall is completely different to that in its only neighbouring County (Devon) and again both are different but have some similarities to other rural counties and areas.

    4.  Is the real priority to provide a quality service to the public in responding to life threatening and emergency incidents and to have the capability to respond to national disasters or the threat of terrorist attacks, which would have full support, or the implementation of a concept that has ignored many concerns and failed to give acceptable responses to specific brigade and elected Member issues. Detailed future budget implications for brigades have not been specified, putting Cornwall County Fire Brigade in the position of having to consider cutting initiatives that fully support the Government's agenda on public protection issues.

    5.  Will the failure of the rural brigades be lost in the overall figures that will give the public a false sense of security rather than the reality that the Regional Control concept will fail to provide the high quality of service that they currently enjoy from their local Control.

    6.  The mobilising system proposed will have significant implications for the rural areas because of the inability to redirect a resource, because of this lives will be put at risk. This will not present such a problem in large urban areas, where fire cover is provided to a greater extent. This is just another example of the failure of the "one size fits all" approach.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 23 March 2006