Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by David Elwell MBE, Communications Manager, Essex County Fire and Rescue Service (FRS 41)

  I have been the Communications Manager for Essex Fire and Rescue Service since 1981and obviously seen many changes many have resulted in improvements to the service in general, However I would like to make the following observations for committee consideration concerning the Regional Fire Control Project.

  Whilst I am directly involved with both the Fire Control and Firelink Projects and the convergence issues arising from the respective projects and will support whatever the ODPM and our local management ultimately dictate, I have serious concerns about the Regional Control project.

  The proposal to consolidate the six Fire Service Controls including the one in Essex to form a regional control centre in Cambridge will in my opinion not provide the required resilience and efficiency. The new control will resemble a technology driven call centre and not be conducive with all of the elements of fire controls activities, many of which will not apparently be undertaken by the control in any event, probably resulting in Brigades having to effectively set a up a 24/7 ops room to liaise with the regional control centre.

  The policy to site the Eastern Region Control at Cambridge Business Park in Cambridge on what is essentially a busy industrial estate is not conducive with ideals set out for such a centre. It is located near to one of the busiest road traffic blackspots in Eastern England near to the A14. This could result in staffing difficulties during bad weather and above normal heavy traffic conditions. (Although I would reiterate that the normal in that area is heavy in any event). It is apparently considered that Local Knowledge is not important, whilst to some degree this may be true in the event of a technology failure at one or more regional controls local knowledge would come into its own.

  The whole concept of the regional controls is technology driven and fraught with danger, The most likely time to lose Landlines/Telecoms Infrastructure, Electrical Power and Radio Aerial Sites is during severe conditions where the use of the former facilities are in maximum demand. It is appreciated that the design concept will take into account the stated failures, however I doubt that any resilience measures will be adequate in the event of serious spate conditions.

  The Fire Service considers it is a Community Based Service with a requirement to educate and liaise with the Community, however moving the control room away from the community based activates contradicts the concept.

  It is appreciated that projects such as Firelink will improve radio communications, but it is imperative that fall back solutions are implemented from the outset and not as in the case of the police retrospectively.

  In summary the whole concept of the Fire Service Control Project is Technology Driven and it is well known from major events such as the Major BT Southampton Exchange Failure, fires involving other BT exchanges causing national connectivity problems, and connectivity problems with networks resulting from 7 July that Communications Infrastructure will and does fail at the optimum time for its usage.

  There is no apparent cost benefit analysis available for the original conception of the idea of regional control and it is considered that any savings will be taken up in supporting unnecessary high levels of technology with little or no manual back up mechanism. A significant number of concerns and issues have been raised as a direct result of convergence work being undertaken by this region, brigades in different areas currently work in different ways with variations in procedures, it is appreciated that convergence will rationalise many issues, however IRMP variations will occur and the attendance prescribed by the regional control will deal with them but only if the technology is efficient or in fact working. I appreciate that there will be many counter arguments from government and in particular from consultants about my views, but my assumptions are based on experience and there are serious concerns both from my self and my colleagues in our control room about the whole concept of control room regionalisation.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 23 March 2006