2 Managing contact centres to deliver
a high quality and cost-effective service
13. The Department's contact centres serve 28 million
customers. To provide a high quality service contact centre managers
must match demand with available resources, including staff, telephony
and IT. Resources must be managed continuously to meet fluctuations
in demand. Managers must also be able to monitor staff performance,
including time taken on calls and on breaks, drawing on real time
information.[25]
14. Customer satisfaction with the service provided
is generally very high. In the National Audit Office survey of
customers, 97% said they were dealt with politely, 86% that their
call was dealt with in a reasonable length of time and 80% that
their query was resolved in one call.[26]
However, although the majority of customers are happy, given the
large numbers using these services, a small dissatisfied proportion
amounts to many tens of thousands of people and there is evidence
that some find dealing with contact centres an alienating experience
which does not help them deal with the complexity of the system.[27]
15. From the Comptroller and Auditor General's Report
the Committee concluded that customers with a disability have
received a worse service than other groups of customers.[28]
In 2004-05 only 20% of calls to the Disability and Carers Service
were answered and nearly 80% blocked, or abandoned by customers
in frustration. The Department acknowledged that the previous
service to customers with a disability had been unacceptable,
but said the service has now been transformed through improvements
in technology.[29] The
number of customers who get through to the Disability and Carers
Service at the first attempt had increased from 44% to 80%.[30]
16. Contact centres can help shield customers from
the complexity of the benefits system. For example, making a call
to a contact centre now replaces the need for customers to fill
out a lengthy application form to claim Jobseeker's Allowance.
The Pension Service also allows customers to make an application
for Pension Credit and Housing Benefit in the same call, significantly
reducing the burden on the customer.[31]
This assistance ought to help the Department reduce errors caused
by customers but it has not so far been able to quantify the effects.[32]
However, it is a matter of concern that the accuracy of information
provided by contact centres to customers scores lowest in mystery
shopping exercises.[33]
The Department has chosen to have staff fully trained on a few
benefits rather than to have a more generalist knowledge of all
the benefits, in order to reduce the scope for erroneous advice.[34]
17. Jobcentre Plus has had a poor record of completing
call backs to customers in a timely manner. Its performance statistics
showed that the proportion completed in September 2005 within
the 24 hour target was as low as 10% and in some centres, it took
as long as two weeks to complete calls.[35]
Call backs are an integral part of the process of applying for
benefit, and a long wait results in delay to the customers' benefit
payments. There is a fast-track application process available,
but it is not drawn to the customer's attention in the contact
centre script, from which agents are encouraged not to divert.[36]
Where their benefit is delayed, customers may apply for a Social
Fund Crisis Loan. Some 38% of such payments are currently made
to cover living expenses while waiting for benefits or wages,
an issue this Committee reported on in 2005.[37]
The Department said its latest statistics showed that call back
performance had improved greatly and by March 2006 over 67% were
completed within 24 hours and 96% within 48 hours.[38]
18. Each service has its own targets for the speed
with which calls are answered. In Jobcentre Plus Direct and Employer
Direct, the target is to answer 80% within 20 seconds. This is
in line with the current call centre industry standard. The Pension
Service and the Disability and Carers Service aim to answer within
30 seconds. Only seven out of 58 sites responding to the National
Audit Office survey actually met their target for speed of answering
in 2004-05. The Department said its first priority is to try and
ensure it meets its current targets and would then go further
if it could within the resources available.[39]
In particular, The Pension Service is keen to move to a 20 seconds
target and the Department is considering whether the call answering
time should be standard across all agencies.
19. Managing contact centres efficiently and effectively
depends on making good use of the staff available, deploying them
to meet fluctuating demand. Our predecessor's report in 2003 found
that the Child Benefit Centre - at that time part of the Department
for Work and Pensions - had staffing arrangements which poorly
reflected the actual pattern of calls received, due to the redeployment
of staff working flexi-time. The Committee recommended that staffing
arrangements should reflect the pattern of calls received.[40]
Despite this, around 70% of the Department's contact centre staff
are on flexi-time contracts, whose core hours do not match the
peaks of contact centre work.[41]
Many agents have been redeployed from elsewhere in the Department.
The Department said it is proud of its family friendly employment
policies but recognises that more suitable staffing arrangements
are needed. It is in discussions with staff and trade unions aimed
at ensuring that working patterns are tailored to the needs of
contact centres.[42]
20. Problems with the IT systems are limiting the
efficient operation of the Department's contact centres. During
a telephone call, agents have access to a number of different
systems showing customer information. However, these are not sufficiently
joined up and customers have to provide the same information on
a number of occasions when applying for benefits or pensions,
much of which is already held somewhere else by the Department.[43]
Sometimes, information entered onto one IT system by the contact
centre has to be printed out and input again onto another IT system.[44]
21. The average cost to the Department of handling
a transaction by telephone is around £3, whereas by post
it is around £5.[45]
It is reasonable to conclude that the Department's contact centres
are delivering improvements in value for money over the old paper-based
systems. This is backed up by evidence of wider cost savings in
the Department, but the Department was unable to be specific about
the actual amount.[46]
Introducing contact centres needs to be carefully managed to ensure
that the Department's efficiency savings - including the contraction
of the local office network - are not being made at the expense
of customers.
22. The Department's cost data and management information
is incomplete in a number of respects. For example, the information
necessary to establish its full costs is not available, and it
does not know how much it has saved directly as a result of introducing
contact centres.[47]
The Department does not have sufficient historic data to enable
it to make operational forecasts of customer demand for its contact
centres.[48] It also
does not keep a record of how many people use its customer access
points ('warm' phones) to call contact centres.[49]
23. The Department acknowledges that there are still
gaps in its cost data and management information, but it is making
improvements in its record keeping.[50]
These improvements include the balanced scorecard, which will
include a range of measures of performance including cost, customer
service, customer satisfaction, staff productivity and absence
rates. However, the data in the scorecard is currently not complete
and it can only be used informally. The full scorecard will not
be available to contact centre managers until 2007.[51]
25 C&AG's Report, para 3.2 Back
26
ibid, paras 5.5-5.9 Back
27
Q 47 Back
28
C&AG's Report, Figures 7, 17, 25, 27 Back
29
Qq 93-96 Back
30
C&AG's Report, para 5.19 Back
31
ibid, Figure 13; Qq 112-113 Back
32
Qq 82-85 Back
33
C&AG's Report, Figure 42 Back
34
Q 121 Back
35
C&AG's Report, Figures 28-29 Back
36
Qq 48-55 Back
37
Ev 39-40; 12th Report from the Committee of Public
Accounts, Helping those in financial hardship: the running
of the Social Fund (HC 601, Session 2005-06) Back
38
Qq 11, 59; Ev 39 Back
39
C&AG's Report, para 4.12; Qq 36-37 Back
40
20th Report from the Committee of Public Accounts,
Better public services through call centres (HC 373, Session
2002-03) Back
41
C&AG's Report, paras 3.10-3.13 Back
42
Qq 7-8 Back
43
C&AG's Report, para 2.14; Q 83 Back
44
C&AG's Report, paras 3.21-3.24 Back
45
ibid, Figure 23 Back
46
Qq 97-101, 110-111; C&AG's Report, Figure 13 Back
47
Qq 97-99, 101-102, 110-111; Ev 39 Back
48
C&AG's Report, paras 3.6-3.7 and Appendix 1, para 11 Back
49
ibid, para 4.15; Qq 41-44 Back
50
Qq 9-10 Back
51
C&AG's Report, para 5.4 Back
|