Select Committee on Public Accounts Fifty-Sixth Report


3  Improving the cost effectiveness of physical education

13. The cost of providing physical education per prisoner varied by over 175% between prisons, from £392 a year at Bullingdon Prison to £1,085 a year at Aylesbury Young Offenders' Institution in 2004-05 (Figure 3). These variations are partly due to differences in the types of prisoners held and the facilities available. Young Offenders Institutions and prisons where there were fewer opportunities to take part in other useful activities tended to offer more physical education than prisons with fewer facilities. There remained, however, large variations between prisons of the same type, for example the cost of physical education at the male local prisons visited by the National Audit Office varied by 68%, from £392 at Bullingdon Prison to £657 at Leeds Prison. The Prison Service did not routinely carry out benchmarking of the costs and provision of physical education between prisons and investigate unexplained differences. Some open prisons used civilian instructors in order to save money on physical education and all privately run prisons used civilian instructors.[15]Figure 3: The cost of physical education per prisoner varied considerably between prisons

figure 3

Source: National Audit Office

14. On average, over 40% of prisoners took part in physical education at least once a week. The proportion in each prison varied, however, from 11% to 87%. The hours prisoners spent in physical education were, on average, close to the weekly hours of exercise recommended by the Chief Medical Officer. Prisons could, however, have done more to increase participation levels particularly by those prisoners in most need of physical exercise, for example the least fit or those recovering from addictions.[16]

15. All prisoners are entitled to time in the open air each day if the weather and requirements for good order permitted. Traditionally prisons have referred to this statutory time in the open air as exercise, but it was different from the physical exercise that prisoners were able to access through taking part in physical education.

16. Efforts made by Prison Governors to pack as much activity as they could into the prison day, when staff were available, meant that there was a risk that activities were managed around the interests of staff rather than those of prisoners. Although most prisons visited by the National Audit Office offered full evening and weekend physical education programmes, staffing issues limited the availability of exercise outside the core day at some prisons. Prisoners who were in education or full time work during the core day struggled, therefore at some prisons, to gain access to physical education at the times that were suitable for them.[17]

17. Some 80% of the prisons visited by the National Audit Office surveyed prisoners to establish which activities they would prefer to take part in. These surveys were used in the planning of activities, they were not however relied on in their entirety as the prisons had to organise activities that appealed to the less fit prisoners and those who were most in need of physical exercise as well as the fittest prisoners who exercised regularly.[18]

18. Some women entered prison with severe drug dependency problems and therefore in a very poor physical state. These women needed to rebuild their strength through regular meals and physical exercise despite the fact they were often unwilling to take part in the more usual gym activities. This situation was exacerbated by the type of facilities and activities on offer. Female prisoners told the National Audit Office that the facilities and activities were often designed for male prisoners. Both women's prisons visited by the National Audit Office had very similar facilities to the men's prisons. Some women's prisons were starting to offer less traditional activities that appealed to women who were not interested in sports or weight training, such as yoga and aerobics classes.[19]

19. Traditional prison physical education activities, such as weight training and football were popular with many prisoners, and had an important role to play in getting prisoners exercising and helping some prisoners to rehabilitate after using drugs outside prison. Some prisoners could, however, be put off physical education by a culture of weight training and football. Prisons tried to provide a range of activities that would encourage those prisoners who were most in need of exercise to take part.[20]


15   Qq 13, 99, 120, 122-127 Back

16   C&AG's Report, para 4.4; Qq 11, 52-57, 91 Back

17   C&AG's Report, para 4.18; Q 98 Back

18   C&AG's Report, para 4.15; Qq 89-90 Back

19   C&AG's Report, para 4.11; Qq 21, 96-97 Back

20   Q 121 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 19 July 2006