Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 100-119)

SIR JOHN BOURN KCB, MS AILEEN MURPHIE ANC MS PAULA DIGGLE

19 APRIL 2006

  Q100  Greg Clark: In terms of this research about the effect of food on behaviour, did I hear you correctly in the response to Mr Bacon that you do not have a research budget?

  Mr Wheatley: The Prison Service within the National Offender Management Service—we are part of the National Offender Management Service—does not have its own separate research budget. Research is funded by the Home Office, the National Offender Management Service through the RDS, the Home Office research group.

  Q101  Greg Clark: That seems extraordinary. You are the Director General of the Prison Service. You would think, in order to make sure you followed best practice, both to save money but also to ensure that your prisoners are cared for to the best available extent, you should be able to research best practice. Are you saying that you do not have any ability to do that?

  Mr Wheatley: I have very limited research funds that I can put out and there is a small scale research, actually funding PhD research, specifically about prisons which the Prison Service funds directly. The budget for research is held centrally within the Home Office. There are efficiencies out of that and it is available for all the suppliers because there are several providers in this area and I am a competitor against the private sector. The fact that the research is done centrally has some advantages.

  Q102  Greg Clark: Have you asked the Home Office to conduct this research? Have you said that it would be important?

  Mr Wheatley: In this particular case I have said I am very happy to cooperate with this research, I have volunteered establishments—I did not have to work hard to do that because governors of those establishments were pleased to volunteer—and I have made sure that those who are supporting a Natural Justice approach know that I am a supporter of getting the research done.

  Q103  Greg Clark: How much does it cost to do this research?

  Mr Wheatley: I do not know because I am not paying for it; I could not give you an accurate answer on that.

  Q104  Greg Clark: It seems a bit passive. It strikes me that this is a crucial question. You have an NAO Report into prisoner diet and exercise. I should have thought you would be very eager to know the answer to the effects of diet on behaviour so you might ask how much the study would cost and, whether from your own resources or by leaning on the Home Office, pester to get it done.

  Mr Wheatley: I am eager to know the answer and that is why I am anxious to cooperate with the research. In the way we are structured, as a provider of prison services within the National Offender Management Service, I do not have a budget for doing major research.

  Q105  Greg Clark: I understand that, but you have a direct line to the Home Office and if they hold the budget, presumably you can put some pressure on them to spend it in a way that would be of most help to you.

  Mr Wheatley: As I have made plain, I have happily agreed to co-operate with this and there is a proposal. The thing is expected to come forward shortly.

  Q106  Greg Clark: It is not the same to co-operate with the project as to actually try to secure a project that would be very helpful.

  Mr Wheatley: It is probably not helpful to ask me precisely all the dealings I have with the main Home Office. It is something I am pleased to see done, but the Home Office must decide the best way of spending their research money and they are accountable for that, not me.

  Q107  Greg Clark: For us to write the Report, would you mind asking the Home Office how much the study would cost and perhaps write to us? [3]

  Mr Wheatley: As I understand the proposal at the moment, Natural Justice actually have funding for this and are proposing to fund it themselves. It is a question simply of getting clearance for the research.

  Q108  Greg Clark: Perhaps you could give us an indicator of the cost.

  Mr Wheatley: Certainly I can give you an update on the position, but, as I understand it, there is the funding available. Funding is not an issue; it is just getting the proposal forward to go through the approvals process I have already commented on.

  Q109  Greg Clark: It seems a bit frustrating I must say to have the funds available and not to be getting on with it. Mr Bacon indicated that I am very interested in porridge and I am sure that you have noticed that porridge has become rather fashionable these days as a foodstuff. Are you aware of the research?

  Mr Wheatley: I am aware that it has become a fashionable thing to eat. I am afraid I eat fruit in the morning myself, but I can see that it is much more fashionable than it used to be and has a number of health benefits claimed for it.

  Q110  Greg Clark: In particular, it is full of soluble dietary fibre which, according to paragraph nine of the Report, is something that the prison diet is lacking in. It is low in fat, salt and sugar, three things that, according to the Report again, paragraph nine, the prison diet is lacking in and it helps the brain release serotonin which helps keep the spirits up, which I would have thought would be pretty important in a prison. Do you serve porridge in prison any more?

  Mr Wheatley: Because we have no firm policy which says that any food must be served, the answer to that is that we do not have a policy which says that porridge should be served or should not be served. There will be a number of establishments serving porridge, but I do not know how many there are.

  Mr Tuckwood: There are some jails, I could not name them here for you, which serve porridge.

  Mr Wheatley: The diet is a locally controlled issue rather than centrally mandated.

  Q111  Greg Clark: The impression the Report gives is that this breakfast pack is the kind of standard way of providing breakfast these days.

  Mr Wheatley: The breakfast pack is used in a number of establishments and it is used only because it facilitates moving prisoners first thing in the morning using the oncoming staff to roll check and move to labour. That is the only reason it is used.

  Q112  Greg Clark: Okay. We shall talk about the reasons in a second but I am interested in knowing how many prisons use the breakfast pack and how many serve porridge in the morning.

  Mr Wheatley: We should have to research that and write separately to you about that.[4]

  Greg Clark: Would you write so that we can reflect on it?

  Mr Bacon: You do not have a research budget.

  Q113  Greg Clark: Exactly; you do not have a research budget, so how are you going to find this out?

  Mr Wheatley: This is a question of asking; I should not call this research which will cost money. It will cost some money as we organise it, but it is a reasonable request.

  Q114  Greg Clark: So you can send an e-mail out to all your prisons to ask them to report whether they serve porridge.

  Mr Wheatley: Yes.

  Q115  Greg Clark: Okay, I shall be interested to hear that. It does seem paradoxical that when the nation is eating porridge, the one place you cannot get it any more, at least in the quantities that you used to be able to, is prison. You might have expected to go to prison in order to improve your diet in this respect, but not here. On the breakfast savings, when did you introduce this requirement or this policy to move to breakfast packs in order to save?

  Mr Wheatley: It is not a requirement in that you must do it. We have made it plain that we think there are advantages in extending the regime by unlocking first thing and moving straight into work, bringing your staff on slightly later, so you keep patrol staff on typically until 8 o'clock, quarter to eight, in the morning, bring on the staff, do a roll check and then unlock and prisoners can move straight on to activities. That was advertised as a sensible way forward, relying on memory here, from about 1999 onwards and the take-up has been higher obviously in establishments where there is a regime to go to. Establishments with extensive regimes can make much better use of the facilities by doing this.

  Q116  Greg Clark: Does Belmarsh have a regime such as that?

  Mr Wheatley: Belmarsh does not have an extensive regime, but is trying to make sure it shares its regime. There are very limited regime facilities for prisoners at Belmarsh so it does a morning and an afternoon.

  Q117  Greg Clark: Does it have a breakfast pack?

  Mr Wheatley: I am not sure.

  Mr Tuckwood: Nor am I.[5]

  Q118 Greg Clark: Perhaps you could let us know about that as well.

  Mr Wheatley: What Belmarsh is doing is sharing a limited regime amongst the prisoners. Because the number of workshops is small it splits the days: you are either in in the morning or in in the afternoon.

  Q119  Greg Clark: In doing this, presumably some assessment has been made as to how much it saves.

  Mr Wheatley: Yes; or how much it gains in terms of activity is the way we look at it. It is not saving money as such, it is enabling us to use the money to do something else and it enables us to get people into activities and extend the prison day with purposeful activity.


3   Note by witness: The Prison Service have offered HMYOI Stoke Heath and HMYOI Warren Hill as establishments where further research by Natural Justice could be undertaken. This offer has been on the table for some time. Natural Justice have been planning to replicate their initial Aylesbury project on a much broader scale. Funding for the research was to be raised by Natural Justice. Natural Justice are aware that the research proposal needs to be scrutinised by the NHS Multi-centre Research Ethics Committees as well as by researchers in the Home Office. As the proposals have not yet been received or reviewed it is not possible to give an accurate estimate of costs. Back

4   Ev 19 Back

5   Note by witness: Breakfast packs are served at HMP Belmarsh seven days a week. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 19 July 2006