Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1-19)

NORTHERN IRELAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, SOCIAL SERVICES AND PUBLIC SAFETY

2 NOVEMBER 2004

  Q1 Chairman: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Committee of Public Accounts of the United Kingdom. We are here, and we are delighted to be here, at Stormont in view of the fact that the Northern Ireland Assembly is currently suspended but we very much hope that this will be our last visit here because we very much look forward to the resumption of what I understand to have been an excellent Northern Ireland committee. I think this will be a very interesting hearing for us and we are much looking forward to it. We have got two very interesting subjects. The first is the use of operating theatres in the Northern Ireland Health and Personal Social Services. We are joined by witnesses from the Northern Ireland Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety. Our first witness is Mr Clive Gowdy, who is Permanent Secretary and Accounting Officer. You are very welcome. Would you like to introduce your two colleagues, please?

  Mr Gowdy: On this side I have Mr Andrew Hamilton, who is Deputy Secretary in the Department, and on my left-hand side, Dr Ian Carson, who is Deputy Chief Medical Officer.

  Q2  Chairman: Thank you very much. We look to this Report with concern because we understand that spending on acute health services in Northern Ireland has been higher than any other region in the United Kingdom, apart from Scotland. These services are provided by 21 acute hospitals which, between them, have a total of 109 operating theatres, serving a population of some 1.7 million. It seems to us that this is a relatively generous provision and we would like to determine this morning why performance has not been better. Perhaps I could start by asking, Mr Gowdy, if you could please look at figure eight in the Comptroller and Auditor General's Report, which you can find on page 66. You will see there that 37% of available weekday physical theatre capacity is not being used and yet we also understand that Northern Ireland has the longest hospital waiting lists in the United Kingdom. How can you explain then the co-existence of long waiting lists with substantial spare physical theatre capacity?

  Mr Gowdy: Chairman, if I might make a point prior to picking up on your introductory remarks. Yes, we do have higher per capita spend on health here in Northern Ireland than in England. That is a reflection of the high levels of need we have. We have higher levels of morbidity, higher levels of disability and higher levels of deprivation, all of which are associated with higher levels of need for health and social services. That is by way of context. In terms of the utilisation of our theatres, we would certainly accept that the point that is being made in this Report is one that we need to take very seriously. It is important that we should seek to get the greatest productivity and greatest efficiency out of the use of our theatres, but there are a number of points that I am sure the Committee would find helpful by way of explanation. In terms of our use of theatres, we are comparable with what is happening elsewhere in the United Kingdom. Our pattern of use of theatres matches the pattern of use in the rest of the United Kingdom. In fact, our current utilisation figure, which has now risen to 64%, matches exactly a sample of trusts that we have compared ourselves with in England. We are not wildly out of kilter with the rest of the UK. I think it is also important to make the point that this figure of 63% utilisation actually masks a number of different things. It is an overall average for all theatres that are used in Northern Ireland. As I am sure the Committee will appreciate, theatres are used for different purposes and in different places. One point to make is that a number of theatres are dedicated for emergency use and have to be kept ready for those emergencies and they are counted in these figures. It is also the case that a number of theatres are used for speciality procedures, such as obstetrics, some used for particular cancer operations, and virtually by definition their utilisation rate is significantly lower. We also have a number of theatres which are in rural hospitals and the catchment area for those rural hospitals and the throughput of cases is substantially lower.

  Q3  Chairman: I must stop you there because in our Committee, as you know, Members do like to have short answers because they are time limited. The fact remains that you—or perhaps you do not—have the longest waiting lists in the United Kingdom, is that right?

  Mr Gowdy: We have the longest waiting lists.

  Q4  Chairman: You have the longest waiting lists in the United Kingdom, yet 37% of available weekday physical theatre capacity is not being used. You have given us a number of excuses but what we would like to now know from you is how you are going to meet the needs of the population of Northern Ireland, who are presently suffering from the longest waiting lists in the United Kingdom, by resolving this problem.

  Mr Gowdy: We have taken very seriously the recommendations that have been made in the Audit Office Report and we have been working with our trusts to ensure that they take all the measures that are needed. As the Report indicates, there are various dimensions to this: the management of theatres, the introduction of theatre information systems, and putting as much as we can into utilising the theatres effectively. What we have been able to achieve through this is a system which is functioning better than it was at the time of the Report. All of the recommendations, with one or two exceptions, have now been fully implemented and we expect all of the recommendations to be in place by the end of—

  Q5  Chairman: We will stop you there because we often get this answer but what we would like to know is why we had to wait for an NAO Report for these recommendations to be carried out. Can you please turn to figure nine on page 68 which deals with the actual use of planned sessions in Northern Ireland's largest hospital trust, the Royal Group of Hospitals Trust? You will see there that the Royal Group of Hospitals Trust were below the Bevan target of 90% of sessions cancelled. I take it that this is an agreed Report and, therefore, this figure is accepted. Why are so many sessions cancelled in this and other trusts?

  Mr Gowdy: The figure you are looking at is 835?

  Q6  Chairman: Yes, that is right.

  Mr Gowdy: There are a number of reasons. I will try to keep my answers as brief as possible. Certainly we are seeing a number of very frail patients being dealt with whose condition can alter quite quickly.

  Q7  Chairman: And that explains this level of cancellation?

  Mr Gowdy: No, it does not. It is one of the factors that we have to take into account. There are also issues around the availability of staff to run the sessions. There are various reasons why they would not be available.

  Q8  Chairman: Are you monitoring this to ensure that they are good reasons that are being given?

  Mr Gowdy: Yes. We are doing two things. We are asking each of the trusts to take responsibility for managing the throughput of cases in their theatres and to do what they can to increase the utilisation. We are taking an overall monitoring look at how those trusts are doing that and what their outcomes are.

  Q9  Chairman: I think other Members will want to come back on this. I am sure you know this Report very well and if you look at Part 4 of the Report—I would like to have a general answer—has your Department defined and agreed with trusts a common set of performance measures for the use of operating theatres so we can get some idea of what is happening around the Province? What theatre utilisation targets have been set for hospitals?

  Mr Gowdy: We are introducing within the next 12 months a new theatre management information system which will be a common computerised system across all of our trusts. That will give us a common, consistent information base on which to compare the performance of each and all of the trusts. Also, we are expecting each of the trusts to report to us on the implementation—we have been doing this at six monthly intervals—of the recommendations made in the Audit Office Report plus in some of the other documents that we have issued to them from other bodies we have been dealing with in terms of theatre use.

  Q10  Chairman: My last question relates to understaffing. This is dealt with in paragraphs 5.17 to 5.47 of the Comptroller and Auditor General's Report which you can find on pages 91 to 97. There is concern, is there not, about the level of consultant and nursing understaffing? Could you please explain to us what the reasons behind this are and what actions you are taking to rectify the situation.

  Mr Gowdy: There are a couple of reasons which it is quite important to explain. One is that we did lose quite a lot of our capacity in the 1990s as a result of a reduction in our base line. A number of posts disappeared as a result of that and a number of beds were taken out of the system as well. What we have found is that the levels of demand have been rising to such an extent that we now need to rebuild our capacity and that is in terms of beds, nursing and medical staff. We have done a number of things to try to correct this. One is that extra medical student places have been put into effect into at Queen's University Medical School. Similarly, we have taken action to increase very substantially the number of nursing students from 480 in the late 1990s through to the current figure of 750 per year. Also, we have been recruiting extensively in places outside the UK, notably the Philippines and India, to increase the number of nursing staff available to us. Theatre nurses in particular have been a problem area for us and we have been correcting that problem, but we still have some vacancies to address there.

  Chairman: Thank you very much for those answers. Mr Curry?

  Q11  Mr Curry: Mr Gowdy, if you look at the various tables there are lots of discrepancies between the performances of the trusts. Which is your best trust?

  Mr Gowdy: All of our trusts are performing to high levels of utilisation against the planned sessions. Our planned sessions in theatre use are those for which the trusts are funded. As you can see from the tables, there is a very high degree of utilisation against those planned sessions. We think that our trusts are getting as much as they can with the level of funding that we have been able to give them.

  Q12  Mr Curry: Which is the best one? In all theatres of life—operating theatres—some are good, some are bad and some are indifferent. Somebody must be at the top of the league table. If I am a journalist coming from the United States and I want to do a really good story about health care in Northern Ireland, where would you point me? Where would you like me to go to really get the best story?

  Mr Gowdy: I am not trying to be evasive. I think that in this case what we have is a range of hospitals doing different things, they have got different case mixes, they have got different contexts within which they operate, some are rural, some are urban, some have a very wide span of specialities, others are narrower, and it is very difficult to make the sort of comparison that you are inviting me to make. From talking to all of our trusts, I believe that they treat very seriously the need to get the greatest efficiency out of their theatres but the circumstances differ.

  Q13  Mr Curry: Which trust has got the greatest degree of surgeon absenteeism or sickness? Could you draw a league table on that?

  Mr Gowdy: If I may, I will let Dr Carson say something about this because he has been involved quite closely in this.

  Q14  Mr Curry: There is a remarkable phrase in the Report talking about surgeons not turning up, you see.

  Mr Gowdy: It fluctuates from time to time in different areas. We have had some problems in terms of being able to recruit and retain enough anaesthetic consultants and other medical staff. Dr Carson may be able to say more about this.

  Dr Carson: Thank you. The utilisation of our scheduled theatres across the Province is running at 95% at the moment. In fact, there are five trusts in which there have been no cancellations whatsoever of scheduled operating sessions and they are running at 100% utilisation of the scheduled capacity. As the Secretary has said, the perceived under-performance in certain organisations is influenced by a variety of factors. There are several factors that influence why an operating list gets cancelled, not just the absence of a surgeon on leave or whatever, there have got to be other services in place to enable an operation to take place. Principally, and increasingly over recent years, it has been the use and availability of intensive care and critical care capacity.

  Q15  Mr Curry: I appreciate all that, but on pages 66 and 68 there just happen to be two tables. One is called "Actual Use of Theatre Capacity" and one is "Actual Use of Scheduled Sessions". I accept that is 2001-02 and things may well have moved on since then, but the fact is that sessions held as a percentage of sessions available run from 82% down to, say, 50%, because below that there are special factors at work obviously, and sessions held as a percentage of sessions intended go from 108% down to 76%. With all the factors brought together there are some people doing better than others, are there not?

  Dr Carson: There is no doubt that there are individual variations in performance.

  Q16  Mr Curry: There are good ones and less good ones.

  Dr Carson: Yes. Having hinted to the Committee that performance has improved, not only since the Audit Office Report but since a variety of good guidance and practice has been shared with the service and the introduction of effective Theatre User Committees and good communication between trust managers and the staff who run and organise theatres, the performance has improved and is continuing to improve.

  Q17  Mr Curry: I am going to leave consultants to the tender care of Mr Steinberg; I should hate to deprive him of one of his favourite topics. Can we look at cardiac surgery at the Royal Victoria? I think you have said already the Report says that the number of operations has gone down because older and sicker patients are being treated, that means more intensive care, that means fewer admissions so there are fewer operations and there is a catch-22 in operation. Surely this must be true of every large hospital in the known world, is it not? There is nothing unique to Northern Ireland about this, medical advances are making it possible to treat older and sicker patients. Is this phenomenon happening everywhere or is it particularly pronounced here?

  Dr Carson: No, it is happening throughout the UK in relation to cardiac surgery. We do have an ageing population. We have had very significant advances in cardiology with interventions at the early stage of heart disease which means that the patients who are coming forward for cardiac surgery now are older and sicker and may well be at end stage of cardiovascular disease. It is a sicker population requiring much more intervention in the post-operative intensive care period.

  Q18  Mr Curry: There are other factors which you admitted as well, that perhaps there were not enough staff, no cover when surgeons were on holiday, the record keeping was not particularly sophisticated, there was no fast tracking. Demography is against you on this, is it not? Does this mean this is always going to happen? What do you do to buck demography on this as people are getting older and more doddery and medical advances are increasing? Are you not going to be running faster to keep still on this one, as it were? How do you break out of that cycle?

  Mr Gowdy: I think it is important to say that the nature of the treatment afforded to those with cardiac conditions has been changing. It is no longer the case that most people would go for a coronary artery bypass graft. Percutaneous interventions, stenting and angioplasty are much more prevalent. We are seeing a very substantial growth in those. In the year 2003-04 we had 1,600 of these percutaneous interventions and we expect to see that rise to just under 2,000 in the current year. The balance is changing away from bypass surgery. We are now able to treat patients with a range of different interventions, cardiological interventions, as well as surgery. If I may say, we are getting the waiting lists on cardiac surgery very substantially reduced. We have made use of facilities outside Northern Ireland and that has helped us to deal with some of the cases that could be transferred elsewhere, while dealing with the most difficult cases within the Royal Hospital.

  Q19  Mr Curry: The key is what, the key is the technology, is that what you are saying, or is the key the management?

  Mr Gowdy: It is advances in the care of cardiac patients. There are a range of interventions now available, including the use of statins and other drug treatments, as well as using stents to open the arteries. These sorts of things are now becoming much more prevalent and are usually treated on a day case basis. This is an easier and quicker way of dealing with some of these problems. Not every patient is suitable for it, of course, so we still need to have some cardiac surgery but the balance is changing substantially although the overall numbers we are treating are much greater.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 29 September 2005