Select Committee on Public Accounts Twenty-Second Report


3  Improving accessibility and integration

8. Most of Britain's railway stations are over 100 years old and 15% are listed buildings, restricting the ways in which they can be maintained and improved. More than half of Britain's stations are not fully accessible to disabled people, but it would require significant funds. It would be expensive to make every station step-free. In response to the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Network Rail and TOCs were working to provide alternative options such as assistance from station staff to make train services accessible. ATOC had published a map showing which stations had step-free access and indicating whether stations were staffed throughout train running hours. If disabled passengers booked their tickets at least 24 hours before travelling, Network Rail and TOCs would aim to provide staff assistance. It would be for the courts to decide whether these practices constituted the reasonable adjustments required under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Beyond these adjustments, however, progress had been slow in improving accessibility at stations. The Department acknowledged that there should be better facilities for visually and hearing impaired passengers, for example. There were, however, questions about affordability and value for money in installing such systems at every station. The Department had earmarked over £370 million to be spent on improving accessibility at Britain's busiest stations by 2015 and was prioritising how the money should be spent in consultation with groups representing disabled people. The Department and Network Rail acknowledged, however, that more funding would be needed, and that it would have to look for further funding in the Office of Rail Regulation's periodic review in 2009-14 to improve accessibility more widely on the network.[12]

9. The Department had limited leverage to improve the integration of local bus and train services, in support of the government's integrated transport objective. In the deregulated bus market outside London, private bus operators responded to commercial incentives in determining their bus routes, and timetables. Better signposting from train stations to local bus stops and displaying bus maps, routes and timetables prominently at stations, would help passengers connecting between buses and trains. More efficient interchanges were needed between rail, buses and community transport to improve stations' accessibility.[13]


12   Qq 33, 35-39, 85, 109, 112-114, 137-138 Back

13   Qq 18, 83-85 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 2 February 2006