Select Committee on Public Accounts Twenty-Fourth Report


1  FIRST MAIN HEADING

1. The BBC's 'White City 2' property development in West London comprises three new buildings which were built next to an existing BBC building known as White City 1 (Figure 1). The construction of the new buildings forms part of the BBC's wider plans to rationalise and modernise its property portfolio.[3]


2. Following competitive tender the BBC selected Land Securities Trillium to finance, construct and operate White City 2 under a 30 year deal, which also covered property services at 48 other BBC locations. Land Securities Trillium's price for constructing White City 2 was £210 million (the present value when the deal was approved — in cash terms the figure was £242 million[4]), £31 million higher than the other short listed bidder. Although the other short listed bidder had offered a better price for construction, the BBC confirmed that it had selected Land Securities Trillium because it offered savings across the wider BBC estate and brought other benefits, including cost certainty and risk transfer.[5]

3. Good practice guidance published by the Office of Government Commerce recommends bringing together designers, constructors and specialist suppliers to work in an integrated team unless it can be clearly demonstrated that separating design and construction will provide better value for money. In the case of White City 2, however, the BBC signed the contract with Land Securities Trillium in September 2001 and Land Securities Trillium took on the design team headed by the architects Allies and Morrison, whom the BBC had separately commissioned a year earlier to produce a design for White City 2.[6]

4. The BBC separated the procurement of design and construction to avoid delays to the White City 2 project. The BBC also considered it had a role to play in producing buildings of high architectural value, and that its approach had been influenced by the need to ensure it had architects who would produce the kind of buildings it wanted. After signing the contract with Land Securities Trillium, however, the BBC made 300 variations to the White City 2 scheme. The variations process was time consuming and overly complicated, although the BBC said that not all of the changes had resulted in additional costs.[7]

5. The price the BBC agreed with Land Securities Trillium for White City 2 and the figures which BBC Management put to the Governors for approval did not represent the full cost of the project. The Governors subsequently approved a request from BBC Management for a further £60.9 million for additional elements, including the completion of the fit-out and the cost of furniture and moving staff to White City 2. The BBC acknowledged that there should have been fuller consideration of whole life costs at the start of the project.[8]

6. Part of the additional cost related to the specialist requirements of BBC Broadcast Limited,[9] a commercial subsidiary which rented part of White City 2 from the BBC. The BBC initially charged BBC Broadcast Limited around £25 a square foot - less than the £42.92 it was costing the BBC. The BBC said it had recovered its costs from its commercial affiliates when taken together, but not whether it had recovered past undercharging of BBC Broadcast Limited. Another commercial subsidiary, BBC Worldwide Limited, may move to White City 2 in the future, and the BBC confirmed that it would charge BBC Worldwide the cost to the BBC of the accommodation, or the market rent if this was higher.[10]

7. The Committee of Public Accounts has highlighted on a number of occasions the importance of the public sector monitoring the returns to the private sector and sharing the benefits of re-financing.[11] The Office of Government Commerce has previously advised the Committee that the normal return to shareholders in deals of this type would be 8% to 15%. The BBC's contract with Land Securities Trillium included a provision to restrict the return to shareholders to a maximum of 30%.[12]

8. The return to shareholders can be identified where the finance for a project has been raised against the assets of that particular project. On White City 2, the BBC did not know the return as the finance had been raised on the strength of Land Securities Trillium's business as a whole.[13]

9. The way the project was financed also meant that, contrary to the BBC's expectations, it was unlikely that the BBC would share in any refinancing benefits as the refinancing of corporate debt by Land Securities Trillium would not under the contract have fed through into gains for the BBC. In the event, to secure refinancing benefits the BBC had to purchase Land Securities Trillium's interest in White City, at a cost of £321.5 million, and abandon the contract less than five years into a deal which was supposed to last 30 years. The BBC estimates that its refinancing of the project through a bond issue will save it £63 million.[14]


3   Q 1; C&AG's Report, para 1 Back

4   The present value expresses future cash flows in terms of their present day value. Back

5   Q 1; C&AG's Report, paras 34, 39 Back

6   C&AG's Report, paras 32-33, 39, Appendix 1; Office of Government Commerce Achieving Excellence Guides, available at www.ogc.gov.uk Back

7   Qq 16-21; C&AG's Report, para 32 Back

8   Qq 2-5; C&AG's Report, para 41 Back

9   The BBC has since sold BBC Broadcast Limited, which has been renamed Red Bee Media Limited. Back

10   Qq 4, 47-49 Back

11   See, for example, 22nd Report from the Committee of Public Accounts, PFI refinancing update (HC 203, Session 2002-03). Back

12   Qq 23-24; C&AG's Report, Figure 7; 42nd Report from the Committee of Public Accounts, Managing the relationship to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects (HC 460, Session 2001-02) Back

13   22nd Report from the Committee of Public Accounts, PFI refinancing update (HC 203, 2002-03); C&AG's Report, Figure 7 Back

14   Qq 11-12; C&AG's Report, para 8 and Figure 7; Ev 14 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 14 February 2006