Select Committee on Public Accounts Thirteenth Report


Conclusions and recommendations


1.  As far back as 1991 the Committee called for improved information on homelessness but official statistics remain inadequate and there is a paucity of reliable data. In developing strategies to help the homeless only 50% of local authorities considered the full range of homeless people in their areas. Working with local authorities and voluntary organisations the Department needs to undertake regular surveys of homeless households focusing on the underlying reasons why they became homeless and track over time the long term success of support provided to help them.

2.  Registered Social Landlords' responsibilities for accommodating homeless households may need to be clarified. Local Authorities enter into agreements with Registered Social Landlords (housing associations) to provide social housing but some are reluctant to accommodate homeless households. The full extent of this problem is not known and ODPM needs to establish with Local Authorities how widespread it is. If necessary, formal agreements with Registered Social Landlords need to be strengthened to make their responsibilities much clearer. Compliance with these agreements should be routinely monitored and communicated to ODPM.

3.  Reducing the number of families living in Bed and Breakfast accommodation from 6,700 in March 2002 to 28 families in March 2004 was a significant achievement, but some 20% of authorities consider that the quality of accommodation has not improved in recent years. It is important that homeless households are not moved from one unsatisfactory form of accommodation to another. ODPM is strengthening the statutory standards that apply to temporary accommodation but local authorities are responsible for inspecting and enforcing them. ODPM needs to obtain better assurance on the quality of temporary accommodation by collecting more systematic intelligence on the frequency and results of inspections, and apply pressure for improvements by promoting the new powers of local authorities under the 2004 Housing Act.

4.  While temporary accommodation such as rented housing is better than bed and breakfast, it is only a short term solution, and the Government has a target to reduce the number of families living in this way from 100,000 to 50,000 by 2010. Working with the Housing Corporation and local authorities, ODPM needs to promote more actively longer term innovative solutions that are proving successful. These include setting up on-line clearing houses to provide free quick access to private sector tenancies, rent deposit schemes to help families purchase their own home, loft conversion schemes to increase the capacity of existing accommodation and adjusting the eligibility requirements to be included on local authorities' main housing registers.

5.  Half of the 700 people housed in rough sleepers' hostels in one London Borough abandoned their accommodation or were evicted. This pattern of repeat homelessness is not uncommon. Local authorities that have been most successful in tackling rough sleeping and rehabilitating more people back into normal life have put in place a range of integrated support which needs to be more widely replicated. This typically includes having sufficient move-on accommodation together with specialist units, out reach workers, support for welfare and mental health, skills training and help in finding employment.

6.  All 354 local authorities in England have produced strategies to tackle homelessness in their areas but only 40% have identified the resources needed to fund their strategy or considered the full range of funding opportunities. 80% of local authorities consider that as a result the priority given to homelessness has increased and better support is now available but very few have set specific targets to monitor progress. Lack of measurable targets is likely to make it difficult to track progress in tackling homelessness locally.

7.  The number of black and minority ethnic households accepted as being homeless and in priority need is three times as high as might be expected. In drawing up their strategies to tackle homelessness only one in twelve local authorities had consulted groups representing black and ethnic minorities. Homelessness policies that are developed by officials without consulting those intended to benefit are much more likely to fail. Reliable communication networks that are easily accessible would give minority groups the confidence that their needs and concerns can be heard and addressed.

8.  More priority needs to be given to preventing homelessness if more expensive remedial action is to be minimised in the future. While over 80% of local authorities considered that the requirement to draw up strategies had led them to improve their approach to preventing homelessness, only 45% of voluntary and community sector organisations agreed. A key barrier to better prevention policies is a lack of definitive evidence about what works cost effectively in different local circumstances. ODPM has commissioned an evaluation of best practice, and the results need to be extensively disseminated including through a dedicated website for practitioners.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 22 November 2005