Select Committee on Public Accounts Thirteenth Report


3  Preventing homelessness

22. Creating a Homelessness Directorate within ODPM has provided a clearer central government focus for policy development and coordination on homelessness issues. The Homelessness Directorate has a number of priority areas for future improved performance. It wishes to encourage more responsive and co-ordinated approaches to homelessness from local authorities and other agencies, to prevent people becoming homeless in the first place. Figure 2 sets out some key preventative approaches.

Figure 2 : How homelessness can be prevented
Cause:

Action:

Parents, relatives or friends not being able or willing to provide accommodation

Mediation services, usually contracted out by local authority to, for example, Relate.

Cause:

Action:

Relationship breakdown, including domestic violence

'Sanctuary' schemes, which allow domestic violence victims to remain in their homes once security measures are in place.

Cause:

Action:

End of assured shorthold tenancy

Housing advice. Rent deposit or bond schemes to encourage landlords to let to potentially homeless people. Landlord-tenant mediation services, to resolve disputes about behaviour or repairs.

Cause:

Action:

Mortgage and rent arrears

Debt counselling. Advocacy services in magistrates' court. Fast tracking housing benefit claims.

Cause:

Action:

Person ill-equipped to sustain a tenancy

Advice and support under the Supporting People programme for vulnerable people at risk of homelessness, for example improving budgeting and "life" skills.

Cause:

Action:

Lack of information

Early and proactive intervention from local authority homelessness services to discuss options and offer assistance and advice.


Source: National Audit Office

23. Through its engagement with departments and agencies, the homelessness Directorate has encouraged a number of promising initiatives. ODPM told us for example about outreach work along with family mediation services aimed at stopping children running away from home, and the provision of a housing advice centre for ex-servicemen at Catterick Barracks.[31] But there are still some shortcomings, for example in liaison with the Department of Health.[32]

24. ODPM distributes Supporting People funds of over £350 million which are earmarked to enable local authorities to provide support for those whom might otherwise find it difficult to keep a home. The money enables local authorities to plan, commission and provide services to help vulnerable people live independently in their homes. In 2003, an independent review found wide variations in the costs of services being provided by different local authorities, and recommended that efficiency savings could be made. ODPM is working with the Audit Commission to establish where there are mis-matches between local need and packages of funding.[33]

25. The Homelessness Directorate required local authorities to review homelessness issues in their area and produce a strategy to address them by July 2003. The aim was to encourage a more comprehensive approach, promoting prevention over traditional responses and demanding an overview of future needs. 80% of local authorities consider that as a result the priority given to homelessness has increased and better support is now available. But an independent review of the strategies found a number of common and fundamental weaknesses.[34] Only 50% of local authorities considered the full range of homeless people in their areas. Very few authorities have set specific targets to monitor progress and 40% have not identified the resources needed to fund their strategy or considered the full range of funding opportunities.[35]

26. The lack of involvement of Social Service Departments in drawing up many of the strategies is surprising given the statutory requirement on them to co-operate with local housing authorities, and the key role they have to play in providing an integrated service to the homeless. ODPM told us they have taken steps to strengthen the linkages, for example through sponsoring more effective joint working in dealing with homeless 16 and 17-year olds.[36]

27. Only one in twelve authorities had consulted black and minority ethnic groups in drawing up their strategies. ODPM told us that across England as a whole, the number of non-white households accepted as being homeless and in priority need is three times as high as would be expected. ODPM has commissioned external research to examine this phenomenon, and expects to publish good practice guidance on diversity of housing provision.[37]

28. Three quarters of local authorities agree that they receive better assistance and advice in tackling homelessness than they did before the Homelessness Directorate was created. The review of strategies showed that few local authorities had been able to evaluate the success or otherwise of their existing services and initiatives.[38] Local authorities need better evidence-based guidance on which preventative approaches work if they are to achieve more positive changes in their services. ODPM accepted the need to work with local authorities to ensure that good practice examples become more widespread as strategies are reviewed and renewed.[39]


31   Qq 51, 116; Ev 17 Back

32   C&AG's Report, para 3.18 Back

33   C&AG's Report, paras 3.19-3.21 Back

34   ibid, Figure 29 Back

35   ibid, Figure 29 Back

36   Qq 110-111, Ev 18 Back

37   Qq 131-134 Back

38   C&AG's Report, para 3.47 Back

39   Ev 18-19 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 22 November 2005