Select Committee on Public Accounts Twenty-Third Report


2  Reducing errors made by the Department

16. HM Revenue and Customs processed 95% of returns accurately in 2004-05, in line with its target. Nearly 500,000 returns were processed with some errors, leading to incorrect charging of tax - £65 million in undercharges and £30 million in overcharges.[43] In 2003-04 12% of over charging errors found exceeded £500.[44] Undercharges may be written-off.[45] A survey by Association of Chartered Certified Accounts of its members in 2004 found that 80% had to spend extra time on their clients' Self Assessment returns due to Departmental errors.[46] Unrepresented taxpayers are less likely to identify the Department's errors or to know how to get these corrected.[47] The Department is seeking to minimise the mistakes it makes in processing of returns. It considers it corrects about two-thirds of the errors it makes and seeks to identify the main causes of error. It plans to improve its quality management systems in local offices to identify and correct errors earlier.[48]

17. The Department achieved an accuracy rate of 71% in 2003-04 and 73% in 2004-05 in setting taxpayer PAYE codes. It made around two million errors which led to errors in the tax codes of 1.4 million people.[49] Setting the tax code correctly is important in ensuring the right amount of tax is deducted at source for employed and pensioner taxpayers, especially when they are not required to make a return. With more taxpayers not needing to file a return, it is even more important to get tax codes right.[50] The Department depends on taxpayers to check that their tax code is right.[51]

18. Around one third of the Department's errors were due to a failure to update the taxpayer's code with information provided by the taxpayer. Taxpayers with income from more than one source were more likely to experience coding errors.[52] The Department expects to remove a third of tax coding errors by improving the management of its processes and by developing better IT and an automated tax coding system.[53] [54]

19. Errors by the Department in logging tax returns and updating taxpayer records have also resulted in late filing penalties being imposed on people who have actually filed their returns on time. The Department estimates that it imposed incorrect penalties on some 30,000 taxpayers in 2004 — 3% of the 950,000 taxpayers with penalties imposed.[55] The Department recognises the need to improve this aspect of its work and it had reduced the proportion of wrongful penalties to an estimated 1% in 2005. It was correcting its databases to remove duplicate records and details of taxpayers who were no longer self employed and it was improving its systems for logging tax returns.[56]

20. The Department is unable to identify individual taxpayers who have been penalised incorrectly and therefore relies on taxpayers to spot its errors. Nor does it know what compensation it has paid to people as a result of its errors.[57] Taxpayers without professional advisers may be less well placed to identify or respond to these or other mistakes in calculating their tax and or in setting their tax codes.[58]


43   Ev 13 Back

44   C&AG's Report, Executive Summary, para 16 Back

45   Q 107 Back

46   C&AG's Report, para 3.22 Back

47   ibid, para 3.12, 3.14, 3.18 Back

48   Qq 52-53 Back

49   Ev 13 Back

50   C&AG's Report, para 3.13 Back

51   Qq 91-92 Back

52   C&AG's Report, para 3.14 Back

53   Q 49 Back

54   Q 54 Back

55   C&AG's Report, para 3.16 Back

56   Q 39 Back

57   Qq 92-105 Back

58   C&AG's Report, paras 3.12, 3.14, 3.18 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 7 February 2006