Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60-79)

DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND SKILLS, LEARNING AND SKILLS COUNCIL AND UFI/LEARNDIRECT

21 NOVEMBER 2005

  Q60  Greg Clark: So it has no overheads?

  Ms Jones: The overheads are kept very small. Also, we make sure that if we are using anything of our central government funded organisation then we charge it at a commercial rate in learndirect Solutions.

  Q61  Greg Clark: What happens if the revenue does not come in in the way that you anticipate and you cannot cover even those minimal costs? What is the procedure then?

  Ms Jones: The costs would fall away. Each contract bears its own costs so if the contract falls away then the costs fall away.

  Q62  Greg Clark: So there is no-one employed specifically to manage this commercial venture?

  Ms Jones: There are two people employed there at the moment.

  Q63  Greg Clark: Who pays their salary if there are no contracts to support them?

  Ms Jones: They are paid by the contracts we have in that side of the business and they are on rolling contracts so if the contract was not renewed their contracts would not be renewed.

  Q64  Greg Clark: In terms of your overheads, which again were referred to earlier, you have had a reorganisation during the summer, you said. How many people are working in marketing now?

  Ms Jones: 20, 23?

  Mr Lloyd: Something like that.

  Q65  Greg Clark: How much of a reduction is that?

  Ms Jones: In marketing I believe by about a third.

  Q66  Greg Clark: And in the more general overheads? Is that consistent?

  Ms Jones: Yes.

  Q67  Greg Clark: It would be helpful to have up to date figures. Can I ask about this rather worrying reference in the Report to your noticing that there have been significant weaknesses in internal controls that may have resulted in some units receiving funding to which they are not entitled? Can you give your latest assessment of how many units and what level of funds we are talking about?

  Ms Jones: As part of the background behind that we do regular audits, we do quarterly audits and then we do an end of year in-depth review. In preparation for the end of year in-depth review, which will take place now.

  Q68  Greg Clark: I am happy about the process you have gone through but what is your latest assessment of what public funds are at risk? What is the quantity?

  Ms Jones: We analysed our own data and we spotted a potential trend.

  Q69  Greg Clark: I know how you have done it. What is the quantity now that is in question?

  Ms Jones: No more than £2 million.

  Q70  Greg Clark: What is the minimum?

  Ms Jones: I do not have a minimum figure. What I have is a maximum figure. It is no more than £2 million and we are now dealing with the detailed investigations to build that number up.

  Q71  Greg Clark: And if some of these organisations have received funding to which they are not entitled how are you going to recover that?

  Ms Jones: Our normal procedure is that we go in, we do a detailed investigation with the organisation, we recover the monies and then we send the report to the police.

  Q72  Greg Clark: And in terms of the public getting its hands on money that may have been misallocated, how does that happen?

  Ms Jones: We recover the funds.

  Q73  Greg Clark: From?

  Ms Jones: From the organisation.

  Q74  Greg Clark: What if they have not got any money?

  Ms Jones: We still attempt to recover the funds from any provision that they may have.

  Q75  Greg Clark: Is it part of your assessment when you enter into contracts with suppliers that they are robust enough financially to be able to pay that?

  Ms Jones: Absolutely.

  Q76  Greg Clark: So if you find that, say, a million pounds is owed, you are confident that that would not be written off and you would get it back?

  Ms Jones: Yes.

  Q77  Greg Clark: Finally, can I ask the National Audit Office: it was difficult to discern from the report whether the NAO's view is that Ufi offers value for money. Can we clarify that at this stage?

  Sir John Bourn: Our view is that it potentially offers value for money but it does not do it yet because of the reasons that have been canvassed in the discussion so far, like the quantity of overheads, like the degree of market penetration and other factors of that kind.

  Q78  Greg Clark: You will have experience of the Open University which is quite effective in a different market at delivering services directly. I was surprised that there were not more benchmark comparisons yet to be able to make that assessment. Was that something that went on or is there a reason why that was not there?

  Ms Hands: The learndirect service is pretty unique. It is quite difficult to get comparators. In terms of the costs per course, for example, those are only just becoming available. Because it is an online system it is not directly replicated elsewhere.

  Q79  Greg Clark: Online systems are not that unusual nowadays.

  Ms Hands: In terms of the way the Ufi one works they are quite unique.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 7 March 2006