Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60-79)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR NORTHERN IRELAND

30 NOVEMBER 2005

  Q60  Mr Williams: For a considerable time we assume.

  Mr Aston: Yes.

The Committee suspended from 4.02 pm to 4.06 pm for a division in the House

  Q61 Mr Williams: We are discussing one of your colleagues in Northern Ireland who made a nice little home job for himself. That was £3 million and we are told there about 200 illegal landfill sites. What would an average illegal landfill site be worth, do you think? Have you put any sort of value on it?

  Mr Peover: It would be very difficult. They vary in range from quite large settings to a farmer who has a hole in the ground in a field in his farm who takes a few container loads of waste. We do have the full range of illegal activity here from small-scale dumping through to large-scale organised crime. When my staff go out into some areas along the border they are accompanied by armed PSNI officers, by soldiers, to protect them. It is really quite a serious problem. In overall terms, I am not sure we have a reliable estimate; because this is clandestine activity, we do not know what the extent of it is. We are uncovering illegal landfill sites on a regular basis.

  Q62  Mr Williams: This may be meaningless and just say so if it is, but could one say they might average out at £1 million a site? Would that be excessive?

  Mr Peover: They might well; I do not think that is excessive.

  Mr Aston: It is difficult to answer, because we do not know how many there are. We have stopped operations at 51 sites and, if you look at what might be going into the black economy, that could be of the order of £24 million.

  Q63  Mr Williams: So it is mega money and in the circumstance, one does not need to ask about the financial credentials and other credentials of the people who are behind these operations.

  Mr Peover: They are huge.

  Mr Rogers: The most uncertain thing is the environmental clean-up cost of illegal sites which may be discovered, for the very reason that you imply, that these are obviously not going to be engineered, not going to be acceptable in any environmental way. That is the great question mark that we have about costs in the future.

  Q64  Mr Williams: I can understand that. Enforcement must be a nightmare and perhaps that is one of the reasons why you have difficulty recruiting people to do the enforcement.

  Mr Peover: Our staff have been interviewed on television and we have to pixel out their faces, because we do not want them to be identified. It is a hazardous operation not only in environmental terms but in terms of their personal security.

  Q65  Mr Williams: One of the problems for this Committee is that we look forward to the day when we can hand you back to Stormont, which should take place, but we have always erred on the side of being gentle in the hearings because we recognise the abnormality of the circumstances in which you operate. Do we see any end?

  Mr Peover: We are having significant success in tackling illegal dumping. We have uncovered a large number of these, we have shut them down and we have stop-and-search arrangements with the PSNI, stopping lorries, looking for illegal waste. The message is going out that there is an inspection regime, which will deter a number of people. We shall not always be able to deter criminals, because there are huge profits to be made, but there is a message that enforcement is being pursued.

  Q66  Mr Williams: Switch from that now to the general position, what you can do, which is make decisions and produce nice little plans and so on. Why is it that, even on that front, the Northern Ireland Sustainable Development Strategy is still not available five years after the Northern Ireland Executive gave a commitment to produce it? That cannot be for the sorts of reasons we have been looking at. What are the special circumstances here?

  Mr Peover: I am hesitant to say it, but it is partly due to the same reasons. The issue with the backlog of transpositions, the 45 pieces of legislation, is that the unit which deals with that legislation and policy is the same unit which is trying to take forward the Sustainable Development Strategy. For those years in particular, the 2003-04 years, they were fully occupied in trying to make sure that we had our legislative programme up to date and avoided the infraction fines that we talked about earlier on.

  Q67  Mr Williams: What surprises us is that you alone have found this abnormally difficulty. Why is it difficult for Northern Ireland and not for anyone else to produce a strategy? Your waste is not different from ours.

  Mr Peover: No, it is not. The whole issue of the Sustainable Development Strategy sits on top of the full range of environmental legislation. We needed to modernise our environmental statute book to get us to a position where we could actually have a sustainable development strategy. The staff who were involved in that modernisation process are some of the staff we are now allocating to this process of developing the strategy. We started later than the rest of the UK. We could not get started until April 2004 after the backlog had been cleared and the work has been going on since then. We are in the process of developing the strategy—the UK published a new framework in March this year—and underpinning that, there are strategies for Wales, Scotland, England and there will be one for Northern Ireland. We are working with our stakeholders, the environmental NGOs, with the district councils, with business, with agriculture, as part of a process of evolving a Northern Ireland strategy which is specific to Northern Ireland, which is not just high level strategy. The view we have received back from those stakeholders and from the Sustainable Development Commission is that what we need to produce is not another high flown strategy alone, but a strategy which has an implementation action plan associated with it, which we had intended to do by the summer of next year and that is still our intention. It is now our intention to combine the strategy with the implementation action plan.

  Q68  Mr Williams: I am due to retire at the end of this parliament. If I ask you to drop me a note when you have achieved your objective there, is it likely I should receive it before retirement?

  Mr Peover: Very likely; certain.

  Q69  Mr Williams: We shall have a little bet on it and you can send me that note.

  Mr Peover: I am determined to produce that strategy and the implementation action plan.

  Q70  Mr Bacon: May I ask you to turn to page 43? You will see there that it says the Waste Management Advisory Board review in 2004 made a number of key recommendations. The first one was: "Establish an independent Environmental Protection Agency for Northern Ireland". Has that happened?

  Mr Peover: The Minister, Lord Rooker, has announced an independent review of environmental governance in Northern Ireland. It is focused on this key issue.

  Q71  Mr Bacon: This was a recommendation from the Waste Management Advisory Board. When did the Waste Management Advisory Board Report? It was June 2004, was it not?

  Mr Peover: Yes, it was.

  Q72  Mr Bacon: That was a year and half ago.

  Mr Peover: Yes.

  Q73  Mr Bacon: It says here, "Establish an independent Environmental Protection Agency". My question was: has that been done?

  Mr Peover: No.

  Q74  Mr Bacon: When was this announcement by the Minister?

  Mr Peover: July.

  Q75  Mr Bacon: Of?

  Mr Peover: Of this year.

  Q76  Mr Bacon: So a year after the Report came out he made an announcement that there would be a review.

  Mr Peover: What I should say to you is that the trigger for that review is not the Waste Management Advisory Board's view, that is certainly a piece of additional support, but it has been a long-running issue in Northern Ireland and, in dialogue with a coalition of the environmental NGOs, a desktop review was done by Professor Richard Macrory which generated a Report with a number of options.

  Q77  Mr Bacon: When you say that "generated a Report with a number of options", is that this Report that is referred to here or is it a different Report?

  Mr Peover: It is a different Report.

  Q78  Mr Bacon: The recommendation was in 2004 to establish an environmental protection agency, but it has taken over a year to decide that you need to talk about it, is that right?

  Mr Peover: No. What has happened is that there are really two parallel strings of activity going on here. We have been deeply engaged with the environmental non-governmental organisations in Northern Ireland and with other stakeholders in looking at environmental governance. We are the only part of the British Isles without an independent environment agency body. A very short review was done, commissioned by the NGOs, which came out with a set of recommendations which basically were the same as this but the way forward that they wanted was not for us just to go ahead—

  Q79  Mr Bacon: "They" the NGOs?

  Mr Peover: "They" the NGOs. They did not want us to go ahead and establish an independent environment agency just like that. They wanted a process of independent review to which all the stakeholders, not just the environmental agency—


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 23 March 2006