2 TACKLING THE CONSEQUENCES
OF COMPLEXITY
7. The complexity of the benefits system has a range
of consequences for the Department and its customers (Figure
3). Complexity is a factor contributing to the high rates
of errors in benefits, as well as a creating a climate in which
fraud may occur more easily. Together, these are estimated at
£2.6 billion in 2004-05.[14]
A mistake of some kind is made in 20% of benefit decisions, often
because of the complex processes involved. Mistakes generate appeals,
230,000 of which were received by the Appeals Service in 2003,
and 45% of which were successful.[15]
Figure 3: The consequences of complexity

8. The Department recognises that it needs to focus
more on error rates, which have grown during a period of organisational
churn.[16] The main areas
where staff make mistakes are closely related to the main causes
of complexity, including misunderstanding of fundamental entitlement,
incorrect award of premiums and problems with the interfaces between
benefits, as well as arithmetical and transcription errors. The
Department has directed increased training effort to offices known
to have high error rates, and is introducing standard models for
benefit processing. It now believes it needs to find new ways
of motivating staff to reduce error rates to help towards removing
the qualification of its accounts, which has now occurred for
the last 16 years. It has still to implement a strategy with long
and short term measures to go beyond the steps already taken.[17]
9. Complexity is a factor leading to errors by customers.
Some may be confused about what information to declare and what
changes of circumstances to report. This is an issue even if the
initial claim process has been made easier. The Department has
made some changes, for instance requiring pensioners to report
changes of circumstances less often and abolishing the need to
make a new claim for Housing Benefit annually. But improving forms
and alerting people to requirements has not worked, and the Department
has commissioned research into the particular difficulties people
have in understanding what is required.[18]
10. The link between complexity and fraud is less
clear cut but it seems likely that complexity creates an environment
in which it is easier for customers not to provide information,
or to delay providing it, and makes it more difficult to verify
the information submitted. The Department has managed to reduce
fraud in Income Support, Jobseeker's Allowance and Pension Credit
from 5.9% of benefit expenditure in 1997-98 to 2.6% in 2003-04
according to its own estimates.
11. Complexity also contributes to low take-up of
benefits such as Pension Credit or Housing Benefit among pensioners.
It makes it difficult for some customers to understand their entitlements
and for staff to provide clear and accurate information to them.
The Department has been making efforts to improve take-up, in
part by reducing the complexity of the claim process for pensioner
benefits, and by offering Pension Credit claimants the opportunity
to complete Council Tax Benefit claim forms over the telephone.[19]
The Pensions Commission's work shows that the complexity of the
state pension system and its interaction with private pension
regulations have played a part in deterring saving for retirement.[20]
12. The replacement of paper-based processes for
many benefits with arrangements for forms to be completed by telephone
has the potential to make claiming benefits easier for some customers.
Telephone claim processes are now available for retirement pension,
Pension Credit and the benefits administered by Jobcentre Plus,
including Housing Benefit, where they will collect the information
and forward it to the local authority. The Department has also
shortened the claim form and reduced information requirements
for many benefits; harmonised rules, for instance between Jobseekers
Allowance, Income Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit;
and improved data sharing.[21]
13. However, there is still some way to go in making
claiming benefits simple. Disability Living Allowance, one of
the most complex benefits, still requires completion of a long
application form.[22]
Many people have had difficulties getting through to contact centres.
People who cannot easily claim by telephone need other routes
to be available, and the paper forms for some benefits are still
lengthy. Although Jobcentre Plus customers have access to financial
assessors, and The Pension Service local service should be available
to people who are unable or unwilling to use the phone, in County
Durham at least this service is not widely known either to pensioners
or to the local Citizens Advice service.[23]
14. The Department faces a major challenge to deliver
a high standard of service at the same time as reducing its staff
by 30,000. Furthermore, the organisational changes mean staff
are moving around and between agencies and the Department acknowledged
that organisation churn was having an effect on the quality of
service. It also has to deal with high levels of staff sickness
absence.[24] Delivering
these changes without reducing customer service can only be achieved
by developing more efficient processes, supported by better use
of information technology. But the Department has had well-publicised
difficulties introducing new systems to support new processes,
including problems with the child support system and the Customer
Management System within Jobcentre Plus.[25]
15. Providing better information to customers also
requires well trained staff with easy access to necessary information.
The Department gives an average of 6.5 days of staff training
a year. The Department has made the huge volumes of guidance required
on benefits more accessible to staff by providing it electronically
and putting in place a telephone support line.[26]
But although two thirds of staff feel confident that they have
the training and knowledge they need, one third do not. Some are
reluctant to give advice for fear of misleading customers, yet
the 1.3 million benefit-related cases a year dealt with by Citizen's
Advice alone show the scale of the need for assistance.[27]
16. The Department also needs to communicate clearly
with the public in its letters, forms and leaflets. It has made
improvements to forms and leaflets, some of which have a Plain
English campaign Crystalmark. However, the Comptroller and Auditor
General's Report included examples of letters which were incomprehensible
to the Department's management, let alone the recipient. There
appears to have been limited progress since promises were made
to this Committee in 2003 and since Ministers expressed concerns
about the standards of letters in 1999.[28]
14 Department for Work and Pensions Resource Account
2004-05, January 2006 Back
15
C&AG's Report, paras 3.3-3.4, 3.16-3.17; Q 8 Back
16
C&AG's Report, paras 3.7-3.9; Qq 95, 99 Back
17
C&AG's Report, para 3.5; Qq 35, 101, 113-114 Back
18
C&AG's Report, para 3.6; Qq 31-32, 70 Back
19
Qq 33-34, 45; C&AG's Report, para 3.10 Back
20
Qq 46-51, 62-63; 2nd Report of the Pension Commission,
A new pension settlement for the Twenty-first Century,
2005 Back
21
C&AG's Report, Annex 1; Qq 3, 60, 80-81, 98 Back
22
Qq 82-83 Back
23
Qq 69, 71-72, 79-80, 97 Back
24
Qq 8-9, 108-109 Back
25
Q 11; C&AG's Report, para 4.17 Back
26
Qq 10, 35, 65-68 Back
27
Qq 58-59, 78, 94 Back
28
Qq 12-13, 15-17, 73-75, 36th Report from the Committee of Public
Accounts, Improving service quality: Action in response to
the Inherited SERPS problem (HC 616, Session 2002-03) Back
|