Select Committee on Public Accounts Forty-Third Report


1  Performance against the PSA target

1. The PSA target to increase bus and light rail usage by 12% by 2010 is important to achievement of the Department's wider transport objectives of reducing emissions, relieving congestion and increasing accessibility. Reversing the history of 40 years of decline in bus passenger numbers to achieve growth in every region by 2008-2011, the last three years of the target period, represented a significant challenge.[2]

2. The Department expected to achieve the 12% greater usage target as bus and light rail use has increased by 8% in the first four years of the Department's target period. The increase in bus usage to date has not been uniform across England, however (Figure 1). Significant growth in bus usage of 32% had been achieved in London, and based on an agreed delivery plan, the Department expected London to continue to deliver its contribution to the target. Elsewhere in England, however, bus usage had fallen by 7% between 2000-01 and 2004-05. There were counties, towns and cities where bus usage was growing, for example, Nottinghamshire and Exeter, and in South East and the South West regions the decline in bus usage had stopped recently. The Department estimated that passenger numbers would increase by 5% in Passenger Transport Executive areas and 14% in other areas as a result of the extension of the national minimum for concessionary fares to fully free fares for people over 60 and the disabled with effect from 1 April 2006. Local authorities' draft local transport plans forecast an average growth in bus use of 8% over the five years from 2006 to 2011. The Department agreed that it was still unlikely that growth would be achieved in all regions.[3]

3. The Department had responsibility and accountability for achievement of the target but had to deliver the required outcome through complex delivery chains, involving local government and commercial operators, independently regulated by the Traffic Commissioners and the Office of Fair Trading (Figure 2). A firmer steer and a more active interest in achievement of the target by the Department would encourage others in the delivery chain to make the commitment necessary to improve bus usage.[4]


Figure2: The delivery chains for bus services in London and outside London


Source: Joint National Audit Office and Audit Commission bus industry work shops

4. The way subsidy is allocated could affect delivery of the PSA target, but the Department regarded funding as a policy issue and hence would not comment on the use of subsidy, including whether more might be achieved through the reallocation of existing subsidies. Public revenue spending on bus services totalled some £2 billion. Bus Service Operators' Grant, which subsidises companies for the amount of fuel they use, amounted to £359 million in 2004-05. The Department had undertaken a public consultation and modelled various options to redirect the funding, but there had been little appetite from authorities or operators for any change, for example to allocate the funding on the basis of the number of passengers carried. Concessionary fares cost £469 million in 2004-05, and the extension of the national minimum concession to free fares for people over 60 and the disabled with effect from 1 April 2006 would cost an additional £350 million. The Department did not have a view, for example, on whether children should also be eligible for concessionary fares when travelling to school in the morning although such an approach might increase bus usage and reduce school run traffic, a major contributor to congestion. Other targeted funding, such as the Rural Bus Subsidy Grant at £50 million a year, represented a relatively small sum. The Transport Innovation Fund, effective from 2008-09 would be significant at £290 million in 2008-09 rising to £2.5 billion in 2014-15 and the Department believed the fund would incentivise local authorities to increase public transport use.[5]

5. The PSA target was intended to contribute to a reduction in congestion and emissions, and improved accessibility but the Department had not been able to measure the target's impact because of a lack of information. Updated Local Transport Plans have been in place since March 2006, and the ten most congested urban areas in England would have agreed local congestion targets. All local authorities would have set accessibility strategies and targets. The Department would be able to use such information to link local authorities' progress against congestion and accessibility targets with their policies on supporting increased bus usage.[6]


2   Qq 1, 119 Back

3   Qq 11, 68, 72, 101, 107-109; C&AG's Report, para 2 Back

4   Qq 24-26 Back

5   Qq 5, 56, 115, 122-123, 128-129, 158 Back

6   Q 4 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 23 May 2006