Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Letter from Chief Executive, Defence Procurement Agency to Sarah McCarthy-Fry MP

  I have seen the record in Hansard[2] of your remarks during last month's defence procurement debate in the House of Commons, where you quoted my evidence the previous day to the Committee of Public Accounts. The Hansard record reads as follows:

  Sarah McCarthy-Fry MP (Portsmouth, North) (Lab):

    "Does the hon Gentleman agree with yesterday's comments by Sir Peter Spencer to the Public Accounts Committee on the MOD Major Projects Report? He said that procurement difficulties are due in large part to the `toxic legacy' of previous Governments and that he expects such difficulties to continue for some years to come."

  In response, Mr Gerald Howarth MP is recorded as saying:

    "I have not seen Sir Peter's remarks, and I shall read them with great care. Sir Peter is in charge now; the delays are occurring now; and the in-service dates are slipping now. It is no good blaming the Government of eight years ago for something for which this Government have taken responsibility for the past eight years. Sir Peter has been in office for the past two or three years, so he should be careful when it comes to casting beams out of other's eyes."

  I am writing to put on record that your statement appears to be based on a misunderstanding of my evidence to the PAC hearing on the Major Projects Report 2005 on 1 February 2006. As the transcript of that hearing shows at question 39, in referring to continuing problems on older projects included in the current Major Projects Report population, what I actually said was that the Department would "continue with this toxic legacy for some years and part of the challenge is how we try retrospectively to deal with the problems which needed to have been sorted out ab initio. "

  These remarks were wholly without reference to which Government was in power at the time these older projects were initiated. Indeed the facts as demonstrated by the MPR itself show that the approval of the range of such projects straddles both the current and previous Administrations.

  I trust that this clarification will set the record straight.

Sir Peter Spencer KCB

Chief of Defence Procurement & Chief Executive

14 March 2006







2   Hansard, 2 February 2006, Col 508. Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 27 June 2006