Select Committee on Public Administration Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 180-181)

LORD STEVENSON OF CODDENHAM CBE, RT HON LORD HURD OF WESTWELL CH, CBE AND MRS ANGELA SARKIS CBE

16 MAY 2006

  Q180  Grant Shapps: It is actually the natural conclusion of what you were saying though, is it not? If you give that £1 million via a project, there is a peerage quite possible or certainly favourably looked upon. Give the money to a political party—actually nowadays, even lend the money to a political party, it is likely to disadvantage you, if your objective is just to get a peerage.

  Lord Stevenson of Coddenham: That is a speculation, an inferential argument, which is quite outwith the considerations of the Appointments Commission.

  Q181  Grant Shapps: It chimes in with exactly what we have just been told though.

  Lord Stevenson of Coddenham: No.

  Lord Hurd of Westwell: It is a conclusion you are drawing. It is not clearly what I was even in a personal view saying.

  Chairman: I think we can draw this to a conclusion at that point. Could I thank you very, very much for coming along. We are very interested in the work that you are doing. The police are quite keen that we should not see certain witnesses, but I can reassure you that they did not mind us seeing you. We have benefited greatly. If you would drop me a line about the resignation list, I would be very grateful indeed. Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 13 July 2006