Select Committee on Public Administration Memoranda


Memorandum submitted by Howell James CBE, Permanent Secretary, Government Communications (RGC01)

In advance of giving evidence on October 27 here is some background on the scope of my role, my approach for driving more strategic government communication and a summary of progress to date.

Background

The Phillis Review, established following recommendations made by your committee, identified that government communication has traditionally focused on news management and paid-for activity, such as advertising. These are critical channels and we must retain a tight grip on them. But a number of factors, in particular the nature of the modern communications environment and its associated impact on the public's media habits, mean that government needs to redefine the way in which it communicates.

As the first Permanent Secretary, Government Communication my role is to balance the day-to-day media focus with a broader and more strategic cross-government role.

To embed a strategic approach within and across departments my role is to:

  • Lead a communication Centre of Excellence and act as Head of Profession for all government communicators;
  • Co-ordinate cross-departmental communication to deliver better and more audience-focused communication;
  • Build capacity across the communication function both at the organisational and individual level
  • Promote and uphold standards of propriety which govern communication activity.

Progress

Driving change across government is not a short-term programme but good progress has been made in the last year. Key achievements include:

1.  Securing buy-in from Permanent Secretaries and Directors of Communication for a more strategic vision for government communication with the needs of the public firmly at its heart. There is recognition across government that communication is not yet sufficiently two-way; with a culture that is announcement, rather than engagement led. We have to increase our understanding of citizen perspectives, attitudes and behaviours, and use that insight to inform both policy and communication. We must exploit all modern communication channels and techniques to maximum effect and not focus all of our attention on traditional favourites.

2.  Establishing the Government Communication Network (GCN) to replace the Government Information and Communication Service (GICS). ln line with Phillis' recommendations, the GCN encompasses all communication disciplines — press, internal, stakeholder and electronic communication as well as strategy and marketing experts. Critically it includes all those working in government communication. It is not restricted to those who were appointed through a specific recruitment process as the old GICS was. GCN currently has over 3000 members and offers a wider ranges of services including professional development, training, GCN Live events and job opportunities. Its inclusivity means that we can drive professionalism across all of government communication.

3.  Driving more effective co-ordination on key cross-cutting priorities. This requires a flexible approach ranging from helping to kick start cross-government co-ordination (e.g. communicating Civil Service reform) to more direct and ongoing involvement (e.g. communicating the Government's counter-terrorism strategy).

4.  Embedding communication into the Professional Skills for Government programme (PSG). As part of PSG Communication and marketing is now recognised as a core skill for all Senior Civil Servants. This demonstrates both the importance attached to communication and the buy-in that now exists across the Civil Service for a more strategic approach.

5.  Completing a review of the propriety guidelines for government communication. The revised guidelines published in January 2005 brought the guidance up to date (e.g. covering new forms of media like the internet) while maintaining the underlying principles of government communication which have served successive administrations. More generally my role provides Directors of Communication with another route for resolving propriety based issues should they be unable to do so through their department's own channels.

6.  Ensuring the right people are appointed to senior roles. As Permanent Secretary I have been involved in all recent senior communication appointments — including appointing Directors at OCA, DEFRA, Northern Ireland Office, CPS, HMRC, Cabinet Office, DCMS, DTI and DFT. The support of the centre helps ensure consistency in the role and remit of these posts and a solid basis for improving departmental capacity.

7.  Launching evolve an interactive professional development framework. Evolve enables communicators across government to assess their skills and compare them with those needed for their current or future roles. The framework was developed with support from the Chartered Institutes of Marketing and PR (CIM and CIPR) to ensure that it meets the highest professional and industry standards.

I look forward to responding to your questions and views when giving evidence on October 27.

October 2005



 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 2 November 2005