Select Committee on Scottish Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 340-354)

MS PATRICIA FERGUSON MSP AND MR IAN CAMPBELL

13 DECEMBER 2005

  Q340  Chairman: The funding that is allocated to Scotland, who will make the decision? Will the ODA make the decision in consultation with the Scottish Executive or what will happen?

  Ms Ferguson: I am not sure exactly what circumstances that might be, Chairman. I am sorry I am being a little bit vague here.

  Mr Campbell: One point is that Scottish Enterprise will be represented on the Scottish steering group which Julia Bracewell will chair. Scottish Enterprise are the main link with business and they are the ones who will be working hardest with the Scottish companies to be involved in ODA contracts when they are being let. That is where the money is likely to come through, so any money that the ODA has budget-wise, they will be in competition with other organisations and other companies trying to get that, the same as other regional development authorities around other parts of England who will be trying to do as well. They are the main link in trying to get that sorted out.

  Q341  Danny Alexander: Can I follow up on that point. Obviously the Olympic Delivery Authority is there to ensure that the infrastructure projects and so on happen on time and award and allocate contracts and the first part of the Chairman's question was will there be a specifically Scottish voice on the ODA in terms of its board and its structure as well. I appreciate the fact that there is a Nations and Regions Committee, but that is somewhat detached from the ODA so will there be a strong Scottish representative around that table to make sure at least, even though, obviously, appropriate rules have to be followed in terms of awarding contracts, that Scottish companies and so on are given a fair hearing, rather than there not being a Scottish voice around that table when those decisions are being taken?

  Ms Ferguson: I do not think that there will be someone specifically Scottish on it necessarily, but obviously the main link in will be through the London Organising Committee and through the Nations and Regions Committee, that is really one of the purposes of Nations and Regions. I do not think there will be someone, if you like, that we are nominating onto the ODA, I do not think it will work like that.

  Mr Campbell: DCMS will determine who goes onto the board or whatever it is that is constructed from there, and presumably they will want the best people to go on there and if Scots are the best to be involved then I expect they will have a place there. We could find out a bit more, but I think the DCMS are probably best placed to give information on how they will constitute it.

  Q342  David Mundell: Minister, earlier on I touched on negative elements and one focus for these negative elements has been football and the SFA's decision not to participate in a unified GB and Northern Ireland football team. What is the Scottish Executive's view on the SFA's decision?

  Ms Ferguson: We really have to allow the SFA to have its position because they are the governing body of that particular sport and it is for them to make that decision, so I do not think it is really for the Executive to have that kind of view. Obviously, we understand the SFA's position, but it is not really for us to have that kind of a view on it.

  Q343  David Mundell: Do you have a dialogue?

  Ms Ferguson: We do obviously discuss many issues with the SFA over the course of the months and years so I am sure that comes up now and again.

  Q344  David Mundell: That sounds like a ministerial answer, both in the Scottish Parliament and here. Would you prefer that they had reached a different decision?

  Ms Ferguson: It really is a decision that they have to come to and obviously they are not alone in that, the Welsh FA have come to the same decision, so there seems to be a stream of thought in football that suggests that that is not the favoured option. It will be interesting to see though because obviously we are talking about football that will be participated in by those who are under 23 and it will be interesting to see whether or not there might be young Scottish footballers who might be disappointed that they are not able to compete in the Olympic Games. Having said that, I think perhaps for most footballers the World Cup is the focus of their ambitions, so I am not sure whether that would actually be the case in reality. It really is a call that they have to make, they are the only people who can.

  Q345  David Mundell: Do you think that maybe over the next six years there is scope to change that decision?

  Ms Ferguson: I suppose there is always that possibility.

  Q346  Danny Alexander: Can I just follow that up briefly, if I may? You mentioned of course that there may be Scottish footballers who might be disappointed at not being able to be part of Team GB. Would the Scottish Executive support the right of any Scottish footballer who would qualify on the grounds of their skill and ability to take part in a UK team to do so, against the wishes of the SFA?

  Ms Ferguson: From memory—you would probably have to check this with the SFA—the SFA have said that if Scottish footballers decide to take part in it then that is a matter for them, so I am not sure that actually the kind of support you are suggesting would be needed. I think the SFA are quite realistic about what that actually means in practice.

  Q347  David Mundell: What do you gauge is the level of support in Scotland for England hosting the 2018 World Cup, and do you think the SFA's approach in relation to the Olympics played any part in no attempt really to forge a wider bid than simply an English bid?

  Ms Ferguson: It is too early to tell what the level of support is; I am not aware that any in depth or proper studies have been done to gauge that, but I do not honestly think that did have any bearing on the FA's decision, it is more to do with the rules that cover those kinds of bids having to be based around footballing nation as it were rather than more than one. I do not honestly think that that was part of their deliberations, but who knows, it may been, but I do not get that impression at all.

  Q348  David Mundell: Do you think there will be any adverse consequences from the SFA's decision on any other basis, such as fewer training camps in Scotland or fewer visitors?

  Ms Ferguson: No, I really do not think so.

  Q349  David Mundell: But there is absolutely no truth in some negative-inspired suggestions that the SFA's decision could lead to the Games schedule for Hampden Park being withdrawn?

  Ms Ferguson: No, I have not had any indication that that would be the case. We know the dates of those matches and we know what is happening, so it is certainly not something that has been suggested to me. I do not think so at all.

  Q350  David Mundell: The extent to which the SFA's responsibility extends to those events, do you think they will be there on the day in a fully supportive capacity?

  Ms Ferguson: I am sure they will be. International football is international football and I think the tickets will go very, very quickly for those events. There will be capacity crowds for the events held at Hampden, I am quite sure there will be.

  Q351  Chairman: Minister, you will have heard about C-ScOT's campaign for a separate Scottish Olympic team.

  Ms Ferguson: Indeed.

  Q352  Chairman: In paragraph 5 of your memorandum you say that "Scotland does not have the infrastructure to host a future Olympic Games. Therefore, a London Games will provide Scottish athletes with their best opportunity to compete on home soil as part of Team GB." Can we take it from that, that the Scottish Executive has little enthusiasm for the idea of a separate Scottish team, or are you simply being pragmatic?

  Ms Ferguson: I think both. A modern Games is a very complex thing to pull together and requires a huge range of facilities of all kinds and a huge infrastructure to scope. I think Scotland is too small a country to be able to do that for the Olympic Games, but also the Executive has no enthusiasm for a Scottish Olympic team and in fact the rules of the Olympics would prohibit a Scottish team as they stand, their own rules would make that impossible. It is not something that we are pursuing at all.

  Q353  David Mundell: It is not worth changing the status of Scotland within the United Kingdom to achieve an Olympic team?

  Ms Ferguson: To take the question literally, it would not be about changing the status of Scotland within the UK, it would actually be about Scotland being entirely separate from the rest of the UK before it would be possible for Scotland to compete as an Olympic team—as the rules of the Olympics currently stand. We have no enthusiasm for that whatsoever.

  Q354  Chairman: Minister, could I thank you and Mr Campbell for your attendance this afternoon. Before I declare the meeting closed, do you wish to say anything in conclusion—perhaps on the areas not covered already during our questioning?

  Ms Ferguson: I think it might be worth saying very briefly, Chairman, that I do genuinely see a great opportunity for Scotland in these Olympics, and one of the reasons I say that is because I think that what we learn and what we get out of those Olympics can stand us in particularly good stead as we go towards the 2014 bid for Glasgow. I think we are learning all the time from what London did and I think we are able to make our bid the best possible bid that we can by learning from these examples. So while we are talking to our colleagues in Melbourne, who are about to host the Commonwealth Games in 2006, it is also of vital importance that we learn from the example of London and that we take advantage of that. I think too for the UK as a whole the opportunity to host those two major sporting events within two years means that we have a real opportunity, both to put Scotland and the UK on the map as hosts of sporting events but also to genuinely increase the participation levels and to make sure that our young people do participate in activity that will be beneficial to them in the longer term and beneficial to the country as a consequence.

  Chairman: Thank you for your evidence which I am sure we will find very helpful when we compile our report. Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 31 October 2006