Select Committee on Standards and Privileges Fourth Report


Pay for Standing Committee Chairmen



Introduction

1. On 13 July 2005, the House decided, following a report by the Review Body on Senior Salaries (SSRB),[1] that Standing Committee chairmen should be paid. In its report, SSRB had recommended that before payment was introduced, the House should give consideration to the question of Chairmen's outside interests, and payment for activities outside the House. An implementation date of 1 November 2005 was therefore agreed by the House, to provide an opportunity for us to consider these matters first.

2. A letter from the Chairman of Ways and Means commenting on some of the underlying issues is set out in the Appendix. We are grateful to him for this helpful input.

3. Standing Committee chairmen are nominated by the Speaker from the membership of the Chairmen's Panel in accordance with the provisions of Standing Order No. 85. The Panel consists of the Chairman of Ways and Means, who chairs it, and the two Deputy Chairmen, together with no fewer than ten Members nominated by the Speaker under Standing Order No. 4(1) "to act as temporary chairmen of committees[2] when requested by the Chairman of Ways and Means". It is formally in respect of any period of nomination to the Panel that such Members will receive this additional remuneration, other than for any period in respect of which they are receiving additional remuneration as a chairman of a select committee.[3]

4. The functions of appointed Panel members are:

  • To act as temporary chairmen in Committee of the whole House;[4] and
  • To take the chair at a sitting in Westminster Hall when so requested by the Chairman of Ways and Means.[5]

In addition, any member of the Panel (including the Deputy Speakers) acts as chairman of any Standing Committee to which the Speaker has appointed them.[6]

5. These are all purely procedural functions, which by their very nature must be discharged impartially. This impartiality is reinforced by the settled policy of the Panel that chairmen of Standing Committees do not participate in any subsequent proceedings in the House on the bill concerned.

The issues

6. The Chairman of Ways and Means has informed us that, currently, Panel members invariably draw attention to any possible conflict of interests when they are approached to chair a given committee; incompatible arrangements are thus avoided at an early stage. While for a Panel member to chair a committee considering a matter in relation to which he or she had a registrable or declarable interest might cast doubt on the impartiality of the chair and the integrity of the Parliamentary process, we are satisfied that the existing arrangements for appointing chairmen ensure that this does not happen. The introduction of payment does not change the position in this respect.

7. The Chairman of Ways and Means has also told us that he is not aware that any member of the Chairmen's Panel, past or present "has received advantage as a consequence of duties performed". However, he recognizes that it is a "conceivable if remote possibility … that after the event a chairman of a controversial, high profile or otherwise interesting Bill Committee might be offered the opportunity to provide a remunerated account of the process".

8. While past experience suggests that such opportunities are likely to occur very infrequently, if at all, we consider that, once chairmen of Standing Committees are remunerated in this capacity, it would be inappropriate for them to accept payment (as distinct from reimbursement of expenses incurred) in respect of anything such as a talk, address, interview, article, book review, contribution to a book or media appearance, etc. where the relevant invitation had been extended to the Member primarily as a result of his or her appointment as a member of the Chairmen's Panel.

9. Our predecessors gave similar guidance in respect of Select Committee chairmen in their Seventh Report of Session 2002-03.[7] By analogy with select committee chairmen,[8] the key question an appointed Panel member should ask when weighing up whether payment for an outside activity is acceptable is "Had I not been an appointed member of the Chairmen's Panel, is it significantly less likely that I would have been asked to undertake this activity?". As with select committee chairmen, in formulating his or her response, a Panel member is welcome to seek advice from the Registrar of Members' Interests, who will if necessary consult the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards.

10. On this basis, we share the view of the Chairman of Ways and Means that, when payment is introduced on 1 November 2005, the House will continue to receive from the Chairmen's Panel the high quality and impartial service to which it is accustomed.



1   Report No. 60, Cm 6566. Back

2   In this context, "committees" means Committees of the whole House. Back

3   See the Resolution (Pay for Chairmen of Standing Committees (No. 2)), Votes and Proceedings,13 July 2005. Back

4   Standing Order No. 4(1). Back

5   Standing Order No. 10(5). Back

6   Standing Order No. 85. Where more than one chairman is appointed, any of them may exercise the relevant powers conferred by Standing Order No. 89(3). The Panel collectively also has power to consider matters of procedure relating to standing committees and to report its opinion thereupon to the House from time to time. Back

7   HC 1292, Annex, para 14. Back

8   Ibid, Annex, para 15. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 19 October 2005