Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Network Rail

  1.  Further to the Committee's announcement of its inquiry into Personal Passenger Safety in Railway Stations, Network Rail would like to take the opportunity to provide a number of comments on this subject and in relation to the questions posed.

  2.  We do note that this inquiry is separate from your on-going inquiry into transport security, "Travelling without Fear", in response to which we have already made a detailed submission. However, the committee are invited to take our earlier submission into account as it deals in detail with significant activities related to passenger safety such as the £17 million upgrade of Network Rail's London CCTV network of 2,500 cameras across our 10 directly managed London stations.

  3.  As the committee will be aware, although Network Rail owns around 2,500 stations, all but 17 are leased back to the Train Operators who manage and maintain the stations on a day-to-day basis and are responsible for the provision of on-station staff. Over 50% of all passenger journeys start or finish at a station managed by Network Rail. They are the hub of the rail network where the needs of hundreds of thousands of people are met every day. Over 650 million people pass through our stations every year.

  4.  By virtue of the size of the those stations that Network Rail does manage (mostly the London termini and a number of the city centre stations such as Leeds, Manchester and Glasgow), they are all continuously staffed and are recognised by our stakeholders as delivering high levels of personal security.

  5.  Whilst the National Audit Office (NAO) grouped responses of passengers using the 28 largest "hub stations" at the highest level, our own customer satisfaction surveys show that there is a 92% satisfaction with security at Network Rail's stations.

  6.  Overall, Network Rail strongly believes that stations play a key role in the service provided to passengers. Stations influence the experience at the start and end of every journey, which is why Network Rail and its predecessor have invested almost £400 million over the past five years in its 17 major stations.

  7.  Network Rail continues to work with train operators, the Government and other funding partners to improve the standards and facilities at railway stations.

  8.  Outside of those for which we have daily management responsibilities, we believe that there is much left to be done to improve station environments, thereby addressing a number of issues including safety. Network Rail has work underway to make it easier to collaborate with other organisations to deliver station improvements and is seeking to lever in some £4bn of investment over the next 10 years from property developers to help fund station improvements.

  9.  In respect of the Secure Stations Scheme, with the exception of one Station currently undergoing its periodic re-accreditation, all our stations are members of the scheme. Obviously, as a supporter, Network Rail would welcome more activity by all industry bodies in this area to raise passenger awareness of, and support for, these initiatives. As we have recently completed our own investment in improved facilities, we are keen to welcome greater TOC participation in the schemes, particularly for stations where there are high levels of crime.

  10.  Network Rail's stations therefore all operate at a level of security above the minimum laid out in the scheme. In addition, by way of their size and high profile, they are subject to a wider range of inspection regimes which cover a range of standards and processes. As such we would not propose to comment on the impact of the scheme at the minimum level of accreditation and inspection.

  11.  Of those few (8%) of passengers who do report not feeling safe at our stations, the main reasons cited are: threat of terrorism, lack of security presence, overcrowding, undesirables, threat of theft, and threat of assault.

  12.  Our experience is that a number of simple measures generally have a significant impact in the perceived security of a station including: the maintenance of a clean and well-lit environment, the prompt repair or removal of vandalism and graffiti, a visible presence of railway or police personnel, good signage and information, and the removal of people begging, sleeping or loitering around the station premises.

  13.  The Secure Station Scheme, while specifically covering the station and car parking facilities only, does recognises the security elements of the "whole journey"—eg the local street lighting, car parking facilities, the availability of bus timetables and information, and telephone numbers and accessibility of local taxi services—may make all the difference to the passenger's perception of the rail journey. Again these are elements built into our planning of station facilities and information in as far as possible.

  14.  As well as independent customer surveys, our main London termini have nominated contacts from London Travel Watch to inspect and report on the services and facilities, our station managers engage in face-to-face passenger contacts to receive comments and criticisms, and we share best practice with security and police bodies as well as members of other railway industry bodies.

  15.  The overall protection and improvement of passenger safety at stations is a concern of our Safety and Environment Plan. The principle risk identified in this context is through the boarding or alighting from trains at stations—something that remains one of the main causes of passenger accidents.

  16.  The train operating companies are responsible for control of this accident risk, and the replacement of Mark 1 slam-door trains with modern rolling stock with automatic doors will reduce it. We will support the train operators in the management of this risk by progressing the risk-based platform stepping strategy agreed by the SRA, ORR and HSE.

  17.  With regards to the question of clarity to passengers of responsibility for security, we would comment that passengers tend to regard security holistically—believing that the vast majority of those industry representatives they interact with during the course of their journey bear a shared degree of responsibility for their safety—as indeed they and their fellow passengers do themselves.

  18.  As I hope the above demonstrates, Network Rail is always striving for practical opportunities to improve safety at our stations, we believe these efforts are delivering results for passengers and that our staff and customers can rightly be proud of the levels of satisfaction we are largely achieving.

30 March 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 25 May 2006