Select Committee on Transport Eleventh Report


8  Congestion and bus priority

72. Witnesses told us that the bus does not generally have the dedicated 'road space' it needs to provide a decent service. As well as delays simply extending journey times, the unpredictability of delays makes it difficult to produce a credible timetable. It is not just traffic volume that causes the problem, illegal parking and road works also cause difficulties.

Impact of congestion

73. Bus Users UK states that urban bus operators require a fleet that is ten per cent larger than would otherwise be needed, simply to deal with the effects of congestion:

Operators are unanimous in agreeing about the problem of congestion. Their views were most pungently stated by Stagecoach, that "congestion is progressively destroying bus services".[79] Local authorities agreed that where bus priority was not available, this presented a limit to bus growth and in some cases meant that services had to be reduced;[80] this was contrasted with, for example, York or Swansea where the bus has its own road space and is therefore far more reliable.[81]

74. The Government appears to be out of step with operators, local authorities and other stakeholders as to how much bus delays and cancelled services are a consequence of congestion or of operator negligence or failure.[82] The Department has stated in 2004 that, for example, in the third quarter of that year the percentage losses of mileage for English bus services were 0.4% from traffic congestion; 0.4% from mechanical problems; and 0.4 % from staffing problems.[83] Mr Dick Helling, Oxfordshire County Council, however, was confident that most of the delays in his area were due to congestion rather than the operators.[84] Congestion is acknowledged by all those involved in the provision of bus services to be a major contributor to the unreliability of bus services. This is particularly worrying because passengers who are driven away from buses because of unreliability are likely to switch to the car, thereby exacerbating the problem. We are concerned that the Government has not acknowledged the role that congestion plays in undermining the provision of bus services and we urge the Government to give a high priority to tackling congestion, in partnership with local authorities, as a central part of the provision of integrated transport services.

Enforcing bus priority

75. There is a strong impression that highway authorities are not enforcing those priority measures that do exist. As Stagecoach told us: "[PTA] areas are often dominated by councillors in favour of re-regulation and, at a local level, they are prepared to oppose a bus lane because of local traders' representations".[85] The PTAs agreed that there is a problem at local level, particularly as regards consistency of provision, as Mr Parker, Tyne & Wear PTA, told us:

    …it is a real problem when you have got five local authorities in Tyne & Wear who all have different rules for bus lanes. Trying to get them all to agree to have the same rules, the result is the police are more reluctant to enforce bus lanes because they claim that drivers can always use the excuse that they are confused and they are not quite sure whether they are in Gateshead or Newcastle.[86]

76. Highway authorities must recognise that priority measures are in the interests of the entire community. Where possible, and particularly in metropolitan areas, bus lanes should be co-ordinated across local authority boundaries. Bus lanes must also be rigorously enforced by the police or safety cameras in order to actively discourage car drivers from flouting the law. Priority measures, such as bus lanes, should also be open to community transport as a matter of course. It is an anomaly that these vital services do not receive priority on the roads.


78   Ev 65 Back

79   Ev 80; operators are not alone, in evidence most of our witnesses agreed about the problem of congestion including Belfast-based Translink, the Transport & General Workers' Union; and the Transport Salaried Staff's Association (Q168) Back

80   Q9 Back

81   Q8; 'Planning for the future of the ftr', Local Transport Today, 24 August 2006 Back

82   Q50 Back

83   Commons written answer, 8 November 2004, c489W Back

84   Qq 50-51 Back

85   Ev 80 Back

86   Q106; there have also been examples in Birmingham and London of councils removing bus lanes Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 26 October 2006