Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 260-279)

MR LES WARNEFORD, MR DENIS WORMWELL, MS NICOLA SHAW, MR MIKE COOPER, MR PETER HUNTLEY AND MR JOHN WAUGH

28 JUNE 2006

  Q260  Chairman: They cannot travel by bus if the services are withdrawn, can they? It is difficult.

  Mr Cooper: If those services are then redirected so that they are benefiting other customers then yes, they can. The point I am trying to make is that if we look empirically at what has happened in Liverpool in the last 12 months more people are travelling by bus.

  Q261  Chairman: Oh, so there are too many people? Mr Wormwell?

  Mr Wormwell: I was just going to comment on the West Midlands where we have a very stable network. We operated 70 million miles before deregulation and we operate 70 million miles now. There inevitably are some service changes and, in fact, one of the things that sometimes happens with a stable network is that the network ossifies and we do need to make sure that we try and take on board what customers want and change services, some due to local authority, some seasonal. Even with a regulated authority like London, in the first three months of this year London had made 146 service changes, so service changes are inevitable but obviously we all hope that they are in the best interests of the customer.

  Q262  Mrs Ellman: Does anyone else have anything to add?

  Ms Shaw: In many cases, as well as changing because we have had a discussion with the local authority about changing the service, we also change because of traffic conditions. One of the points Mr Waugh made at the beginning was that we were not able to schedule our services and we were not able to be effective so that we had enough recovery time, et cetera. I take quite strong opposition to that. What we do is try and make sure we have got the right resources in the right place. For example, we have major works in Sheffield city centre at the moment. We have injected more buses onto the routes that are going through that city centre during the period of construction works in order that we can get as many people through and we can give as reliable a service as possible. If we had not done that, if we had not made those changes to that route, we would not have met the needs of the large numbers of people that travel on those routes. As a result we have reduced the service on some other routes to remove the vehicles that we do have and put them onto those high capacity routes that are going through places that are being dug up, so we try to meet the needs of the majority and make sure that we minimise the impact on others who are travelling around other parts of the city. That is the sort of thing we do all the time to ensure that our network best meets the needs of the most people that we can achieve. The other thing about the long list we have got at the moment is that in the summer we often make changes because the nature of travel patterns changes in the summer. A lot of our passengers are young, they are at school, they are at university. In the summer the numbers of people in the city change and we also know that our staff want to go on holiday, so we try and change the services to accommodate the fact that there are fewer people travelling anyway, give our staff more chance to go on holiday so that in heavy periods in the winter months we can put services back. I am not sure about Merseyside because we do not operate there, but if you had a long list of service changes for me in the summer one of the things I would probably say is that that results from the fact that we are trying to meet the level of service we need in the summer.

  Q263  Mrs Ellman: How serious is congestion in relation to bus passenger transport? Is it an impediment to buses?

  Mr Warneford: Linked to the question you just asked on the south Manchester experience, we have owned that company for 10 years. We run 10% less mileage now than we did 10 years ago but we run it with exactly the same number of buses. Our entire fleet of 600 buses is running 10% slower, which effectively means 10% more cost per mile, but we carry 25% more adult passengers than we did 10 years ago.

  Q264  Mrs Ellman: Does anyone else want to comment on congestion?

  Mr Wormwell: Congestion is the biggest single factor that is affecting bus usage in that journeys are slower and we have to put more capacity in to keep the same frequencies without proper bus priorities. When we have worked in voluntary partnerships, although I know there are no statutory ones yet, we have seen that we are able to deliver reliable and frequent services that deliver double-digit growth.

  Q265  Mrs Ellman: What about the role of the Department for Transport? Do you think they could be more active in supporting buses? Is there anything you would like them to do to assist you more?

  Mr Huntley: One thing we are very conscious of is that this issue of bus operating speed and bus operator costs has a direct impact on the local community and what we are able to do. It is not currently part of the transport plan targets or measurements. It would be extremely useful to be able to have targets for bus operating speed built into that so that we could all see transparently that if buses in a particular town or city were not able to run at a reasonable speed then that impacts on the service that can be delivered and we can be judged empirically on what we are actually delivering for those speeds.

  Q266  Mrs Ellman: Would you say that you have made a success of deregulation?

  Mr Wormwell: I think deregulation was trying initially to cut costs, bring competition to the market and grow patronage. We did see the patronage decline lessen, so although it has continued it has slowed. We have substantially cut costs and I know from the West Midlands that for what would have cost £40 million to run the service before deregulation the subsidy is less than £6 million now. Of course, we have also invested heavily in the industry, in our business we have invested nearly £200 million on vehicles in the last 10 years, so I would have thought that deregulation has worked.

  Mr Cooper: If you look economically at what is happening, in 1985 one billion pounds of the public purse has now been directed elsewhere so, if I look at that on the one hand and what my customers are telling me on the other, given the earlier point, and 91% of them are saying that they are satisfied with the service, I would judge deregulation to be a success, yes.

  Q267  Chairman: Mr Warneford, you are convinced it is a success, are you not?

  Mr Warneford: I think we can do more. I think we have achieved some success. I think the partnership schemes that we have been seeing in parts of the country in the last two or three years are delivering greater success and we could replicate that more.

  Q268  Mrs Ellman: What kind of success do you think you could achieve?

  Mr Warneford: For our part we have managed on average about 2% passenger growth over the last two or three years now. It has been very hard work. It is not universal. We have got more growth than that in some places and we have got decline in other places. What could we achieve? If I said that the best growth we have got is perhaps four to 5% in the really successful places, if we could replicate that everywhere, and that would be enormously difficult but not impossible, that would be a huge success.

  Q269  Chairman: Mr Waugh?

  Mr Waugh: I just have to repeat the point I made in my written evidence, that we would never have been allowed to exist with regulation. The big operators would have worked with the local authority in a very heavy way and would have seen us as a threat. That is a serious concern to me. We are part of Solent Transport, which is trumpeted as a superb exercise in joint operation between bus companies. We are now finding that it is showing a potentially depressing impact on our business because it is designed and run by big companies whose aim is not to see us grow and flourish but to keep us in our box.

  Q270  Clive Efford: I want to come back on something that Mr Cooper said about customer satisfaction. You said that 91% of your customers were saying they were satisfied. What do you do to measure the dissatisfaction of people who are not on your buses? I go back to a question I asked earlier on. The position here is about passenger decline resulting in more and more people stopping being your customers. That is the issue we are trying to address and what do you do to measure that satisfaction and demand to improve services that will address that problem and get those people back on buses?

  Mr Cooper: We asked people, if they said they were dissatisfied with us, "Why is that?", and if you look at the three major reasons for that, one is down to no provision of a bus shelter, secondly, the condition of the bus stop, and finally they talk about the smoothness of the journey. There are strong arguments to say that at least two and possibly three of those are down to external factors away from the operator, but could we improve that? Certainly we should be trying.

  Q271  Mr Scott: One of the reasons why passengers do not travel is because they do not necessarily feel secure. Can you tell me, particularly for vulnerable groups and particularly at night, how do you make passengers feel safer on your vehicles?

  Ms Shaw: We run a significant night bus service in Glasgow and we work very hard with the police and the traffic commissioner there to develop a partnership in which, where the levels of crime rise in a particular area, and we have seen that happen, we agree with the police that we will pull out of the area and the traffic commissioner agrees that we will not run the route until the point at which the police say we can come back because it is safe. We work hard with the police to ensure that any crime that takes place on the bus is prosecuted and we are installing CCTV on all of the vehicles coming onto those routes, so we are working hard to ensure that we cover a lot of the security aspects but also the communication and the prosecution of offenders.

  Q272  Mr Scott: Is that CCTV going to be monitored or is it just recorded?

  Ms Shaw: We are hoping to introduce a system where we can have digital downloading. Currently we only monitor the CCTV when an incident has developed.

  Mr Huntley: We certainly have used closed circuit television as an important part of our efforts to improve safety and we are using special techniques whereby the driver has an alarm button which immediately captures the digital CCTV into the police network. From the survey responses from our customers, it is not the time that they are spending on the bus that appears to be the problem. It is walking from bus stops to where they live which can be the most dangerous part of the journey. That is part of the challenge that faces us all in our urban environments, to make the whole environment safer, not just the bus journey.

  Q273  Mr Scott: No-one else has any problems with antisocial behaviour on buses?

  Mr Wormwell: I think antisocial behaviour is a problem everywhere, especially in the larger metropolitan areas. Like the other groups, we have worked very closely on safer travel initiatives with the police. Seventy% of our vehicles in the West Midlands have CCTV on them, most of those digital CCTV, and 100% in Dundee.

  Q274  Chairman: Can we determine who else has got CCTV? What is the percentage, Ms Shaw?

  Ms Shaw: It is 100% in London and it varies outside London. We have focused on urban areas and the new vehicles.

  Q275  Chairman: From what to what?

  Ms Shaw: I do not have the details but I can get those for you.

  Q276  Chairman: Would you give them to us please? Who else? Mr Warneford?

  Mr Warneford: I do not know our percentage, Chairman, but I can say that every new bus that we buy is now fitted with CCTV.

  Q277  Chairman: Yes, but your existing fleet—perhaps you would be kind enough to supply us with that. Mr Cooper?

  Mr Cooper: Likewise, 100% in London. It varies outside. I can provide that data for you.

  Q278  Chairman: Oh, how strange. Where you have got a franchise it does not seem to be 100%. Mr Huntley?

  Mr Huntley: Just over 66% of the total fleet has it.

  Mr Waugh: And 100%.

  Chairman: Well done, Mr Waugh.

  Q279  Mr Scott: Did you want to add something, Mr Cooper?

  Mr Cooper: Buses are safe and buses are perceived to be safe. If you ask customers what is important to them in terms of their journey they really have to work hard to get to this feeling of lack of personal safety. All the research that we have done tells us that.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 26 October 2006