Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by Department for Transport

  Thank you for your letter of 18 October about rail passenger operations and the circumstances in which the Government might be prepared to renegotiate a franchise agreement.

  Changes to franchises at the detailed level are common. Franchises often last for 10 years or more and changes will inevitably be needed from time to time to take account of changing circumstances. The Department, franchise holders and others may well seek alterations, for example, to stopping patterns for individual trains or a complete service. Because franchise agreements typically specify services to this level of detail, an amendment to the contract will generally be needed to allow changes of this sort to happen. I expect routine changes of this sort to continue. You may also know that we are seeking to replace our existing year-by-year agreement with Virgin West Coast with a conventional franchise. This, though, will depend on achieving a deal which represents good value for money. We are in any case looking at this with a view to moving to a proper franchise comparable to others around the network rather than as a response to any approach from the operator.

  We have, on the other hand, made it very clear more generally that we are not prepared to renegotiate the main terms on which a franchise was awarded in the first place other than in circumstances where doing so would clearly benefit the public purse. That remains the case. It is difficult to say that there will never be any circumstances in which we would set that policy aside. What I can say is that I cannot currently foresee a situation in which we would be prepared to do so.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 5 November 2006