Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Dr Roger Sexton

RAIL PASSENGER FRANCHISING

  I can be relatively brief. I wish to address a question which you do not expressly mention in the terms of reference for your enquiry:

Who should grant rail passenger franchises?

A.  Local and Regional Services

  The franchising should be in the hands of regional PTEs. I take the liberty of repeating a section from my memorandum to your 2003 enquiry on The Future of the Railway. There I said (Evidence page 194, section 12).

    "In my submission to the Committee regarding bus services, I advocated that the London system of bus franchising should be extended to the rest of the country. The franchising would be done by regional PTEs. I stick by this proposal, but with a crucial addition.

    The regional PTEs would also take over the franchising of local railway services in their respective areas. The regional PTEs would have their own budgets, but I would expect them to ensure that bus and train services were integrated with each other, not competing with each other.

    The model for this proposal comes from Sweden, where all local bus, train and boat services are franchised by regional PTEs called `Lanstrafiken'. All transport timetables are integrated with each other. All services within a particular Lanstrafik area have the same fares system. I would suggest that the committee pays a study visit to the Va­st region based in Gothenburg, to see how things should be done."

B.  Long-Distance Services

  The franchising should be done by a national body (with regional representation) supported by the national Department of Transport. Again borrowing from Sweden, I will call that body British Rijkstrafiken—"BRT".

  It would be a major function of BRT to ensure the co-ordination of long distance services with local services—both ticketing and timetables. The current Route Utilization Surveys started by the Strategic Rail Authority and being continued by the Department of Transport would come under BRT's auspices. On busy sections of line (eg St Pancras-Luton) and at congested stations (eg Birmingham New Street), BRT will have to make tough choices.

C.  Why this Franchising Structure?

  My franchising structure is intended to give Britain the properly integrated system of public transport enjoyed by the Swiss and by some of our EU partners. As things currently stand, the legal regimes now governing British public transport (bus deregulation and over-centralised rail franchising) make such integration impossible.

13 June 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 5 November 2006