Select Committee on Transport Fourth Special Report


TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE - Recommendation 14

Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) and Public & Commercial Services Union (PCS)

JOINT STATEMENT

1.The MCA and PCS are pleased to have this opportunity to address the inconsistencies in evidence between their respective organisations given to the Committee at its hearing on 2 March 2005.

a. Staffing levels in Coastguard Operations Rooms

The MCA and PCS have discussed the staffing levels at co-ordination centres and acknowledged that there is currently an issue with regard to vacant posts currently being filled by staff from lower grades on temporary and geographic promotion. Both the MCA and PCS recognise that these vacancies need to be filled with fully trained staff in the substantive grade, at the correct complement levels. Both the MCA and PCS will set up a working party to look at accurate collection of data of staffing levels, individual staff competencies, the use of temporary and geographic promotion, and the risk assessment process for correct staffing levels and competencies within operations rooms.

b. Skills of Watch Staff

Watch Officer shortages within a co-ordination centre's operations room have been recognised by the MCA and a "Training Ahead of Need" scheme introduced. Staff at the basic grade will, on recommendation from their line management, be trained to perform the work of the next higher grade. In other words they will be trained ahead of need and capable of carrying out the job of the next higher grade immediately on promotion without any skills gap. The training will also enable officers to gain valuable experience by deputising for the higher grade under the direct supervision of a watch manager. The MCA will continue to work with the PCS to ensure that the scheme remains relevant. However the current process of temporary and geographic promotion needs to be reviewed to ensure the skills of watch staff are not diluted to the detriment of SAR activities.

c. Development of operational partnerships between co-ordination centres and any restructuring

The introduction of new technology and revised management arrangements agreed between MCA and PCS have allowed for 3 trials to be run based on the "pairing" of co-ordination centres (Brixham/Falmouth,Aberdeen/Forth and Solent/Portland) and their development as operational partnerships. This will potentially allow paired stations to become equal partners to support each other during incidents. It may also, where appropriate, allow one partner to take over the other centre's area of responsibility to release staff at that centre to undertake other work, e.g. SAR training or accident prevention work.

However both the MCA and PCS accept that pairing co-ordination centres inevitably raises a number of technical, operational and staffing issues which need to be properly assessed. It is agreed that the lessons learned from the pairing trials should be shared with other partnerships to enable further work to be taken forward in developing these partnerships. A report on each of the trials will be submitted to and discussed in the first instance at Regional Joint Working Groups and later at the National Joint Working Group.

d. The reliability of the VISION IT System

The installation of the Incident Management System (IMS)/VISION has been completed. The issues raised concerning the operation of the system are being addressed and some final improvements are in the process of being implemented. However the MCA and PCS can confirm that IMS/VISION is operationally sound.

2.The MCA and PCS also agree that any further modernisation and restructuring of the SAR response and co-ordination service provided by MCA is taken forward through joint consultation and agreement between the PCS and MCA.

3.The MCA and PCS would also like to take this opportunity to recognise the excellent work undertaken by the PCS/MCA National Joint Working Group (NJWG) concerning the introduction of new technology and the revised arrangements for the management of SAR Areas and co-ordination centres. Included in this work was the establishment of operational partnerships between adjacent rescue co-ordination centres where their command, control and communications are linked via the new technology. This joint work by MCA and PCS was the first step in paving the way for the modernisation of the Coastguard's role from one of just search and rescue co-ordination to one which also includes accident prevention and other safety related work.

4.The success of the NJWG not only strengthened industrial relations between PCS and MCA but enabled that phase of modernisation to progress harmoniously and co-operatively. In order for the issues highlighted by the Transport Select Committee to be successfully addressed and the next phase of modernisation to be discussed the NJWG will meet every 3 months alongside rejuvenated Regional Joint Working Groups (RJWG) which will also meet every 3 months but 2 weeks prior to the NJWG.

5.An effective NJWG in conjunction with a RJWG network will provide the MCA and PCS with the opportunity to ensure that operational partnerships develop appropriately and that staff are given the necessary training and guidance to undertake the accident prevention and safety related work to which the MCA is committed.

6.The MCA and PCS are committed to try and work in partnership in taking forward any future technological and structural changes within the MCA as a whole. In addition, staff affected will be consulted on a regular basis and their views taken into account.


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 25 October 2005