Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140-159)

MR PAUL PLUMMER, MS JANET GOODLAND, MR ROB HOLDEN, MR THEO STEEL AND MR PAUL SMITH

19 OCTOBER 2005

  Q140 Mrs Ellman: Have you considered running direct services from European cities to the Olympic site?

  Mr Holden: Eurostar will no doubt be looking at possible options. As I have already said, the Eurostar services which will ordinarily stop at Stratford will be suspended during the course of the Games with trains stopping both at Ebbsfleet and King's Cross St Pancras. Whether Eurostar plans to run beyond Paris and Brussels is not something I could give an answer to today.

  Q141 Mrs Ellman: Do you have a view on that?

  Mr Holden: I believe it will be extremely difficult to run services from beyond Paris and Brussels given the length of journeys and the ability to obtain train paths beyond the existing destinations.

  Q142 Mrs Ellman: Has this been investigated?

  Mr Holden: Not to my knowledge at this time, no.

  Q143 Mrs Ellman: How do you know it would be so difficult?

  Mr Holden: Eurostar people, I know, have had enormous problems in recent years in obtaining paths at the right times in order to improve existing services between London and Paris and London and Brussels. As I understand it, the biggest difficulty is likely to be on the French high speed line between Paris and Lille which is already very heavily congested at most times of the day.

  Q144 Mrs Ellman: It sounds as if there have been either some investigations which are not being disclosed or a decision reached without working out the way that decision has been arrived at.

  Mr Holden: I am not aware that any investigations have been done specifically for the Olympic Games. What I do know is that Eurostar have in the past looked at frequencies on the high speed line, particularly in France. SNCF and RFF, the French railways, would have to increase the capacity in northern France to increase the frequency of services.

  Q145 Mrs Ellman: I would like to ask about what arrangements the train operating companies are making on the provision of foreign languages on trains, anticipating large numbers of overseas visitors.

  Mr Steel: I certainly have some trains where we make prerecorded foreign announcements on coming into Harwich at the moment. Most of our trains have the drivers making announcements and that is something that we will have to think through carefully. If you go to Harwich on one of our hourly trains from Liverpool Street, you will have one of my staff's Dutch mother making an announcement which is relevant to Harwich and the project manager who built the trains speaking in German.

  Q146 Chairman: You do Dutch and German?

  Mr Steel: Yes, at Harwich International. The ships go to Germany and to Holland.

  Q147 Chairman: You are assuming no one will travel to either of those countries from further afield. In Korean trains routinely, including suburban and domestic trains, the Committee were able to follow the system very simply on their own because every train had announcements, a loop, which played with four different major languages and which, in the case of Korea were not only Korean and Japanese but were Mandarin and English. What plans does ATOC have to cover not just the possibility of having one Dutch speaking person on board but a number of languages which would provide information, not just on the trains but in the stations?

  Mr Steel: We are more than happy to look at it.

  Q148 Chairman: But you have not done so yet?

  Mr Steel: No. There are automatic announcements that we have in foreign languages. I believe I have staff at Liverpool Street, from when we last did an audit, that can speak 64 different languages.

  Q149 Chairman: Yes, but they are not doing it. I know lots of staff that can speak 64 different languages. They are not usually the sort you can record in Hansard.

  Mr Steel: That is from the total number of staff.

  Q150 Chairman: You are looking at the information system so that people entering the stations at either end can find what is available and follow the information?

  Mr Smith: Information is critical, is it not? We need to understand exactly what sort of information needs to be given to certain sorts of people and determine that in advance, particularly those who are arriving at London termini travelling through to Olympic events. We work with our partners, TFL, with Network Rail and others in determining the consistent message we will give to those customers. I think information rather than language is critical initially and we will move on to what we can do in terms of—

  Q151 Chairman: And you are already doing this?

  Mr Smith: We are not doing it yet but we will be looking at those options.

  Q152 Mr Martlew: This is not the first Olympic Games ever to be held. Are you going to reinvent the wheel? Are you going to cities which have had the Olympic Games in the past to find out what they did and whether it worked?

  Mr Smith: We have not yet but no doubt we will draw on experience from those places.

  Mr Steel: In the company I work for we had an Australian experience which included running buses in the Sydney Olympics and we can certainly draw on that experience.

  Q153 Mr Clelland: Can I ask if the train operating companies are prepared to cooperate in the scheme to take part in the integrated travel and admission tickets such as the Oyster card system?

  Mr Steel: We are in very active discussions with the Department for Transport and TFL over Oyster cards. Two of us personally have spent a lot of time on that subject and we have had letters from the Minister encouraging us to find a way forward and to be involved.

  Q154 Mr Clelland: You are confident you will find a way forward. What are the obstacles? What are the problems?

  Mr Steel: Obviously London Underground is a closed system with gates. We have gates at our key stations and we have to make sure that we can protect the revenue. The revenue risk is quite an important element in this consideration.

  Q155 Mr Clelland: What is the danger to the revenue?

  Mr Steel: If people do not key in and key out with their Oyster card and if they do not have a gate to go through, then we have to make sure that the revenue is accounted for.

  Q156 Mr Martlew: I travel regularly on the Docklands Light Railway and they do not have gates but they do take Oyster cards.

  Mr Steel: Their average fare is rather lower than ours and the Docklands Light Railway system is the Docklands Light Railway system. I know it connects in and out at various locations but once you are at Stratford you can get to Norwich.

  Q157 Mr Martlew: Are you saying that the DLR is not interested in collecting fares?

  Mr Steel: No. I am saying that we are looking at that very carefully in terms of gathering evidence and trying to see a way forward.

  Q158 Mr Clelland: Are there some technical difficulties apart from people skipping the barriers, in producing a system?

  Mr Steel: We have to find a modern ticket issuing machine which is Oyster compatible.

  Mr Smith: We do not have the capability yet to issue Oyster tickets. That is one of the issues. We need to develop a system that can do that, which we are currently working on with DFT and TFL.

  Q159 Chairman: Are Thameslink passengers going to have to walk 500 metres to King's Cross Thameslink from the Pentonville Road or are they going to be able to use the new stations adjacent to the CTRL shuttle?

  Ms Goodland: I think we answered Mr Efford's question on that earlier. I repeat that we are currently working with the Department and the Office of the Rail Regulator to try and identify a way of taking that project forward so that the new station will be open well in advance of 2012.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 March 2006