Select Committee on Transport Third Report


2  Management and funding

Developing the bid

8. The planning and engineering consultants, Arup, were commissioned in January 2002 by the Government, the Mayor of London and the British Olympic Association (BOA) to conduct a feasibility study into the potential for a London Olympic bid. The brief stipulated an Olympic Village, main stadium, and other facilities in the Lower Lea Valley, Stratford, east London.[6]

9. Quantifiable benefits identified by Arup included:

  • regeneration of east London, with the creation of around 3,000 jobs
  • £70 million from the fiscal impacts of growth in the economy attributable to the Games
  • income generated by the growth in tourism, creating a surplus over additional expenditure of between £280 million and £507 million

Arup also listed a range of unquantifiable benefits and legacies, including national prestige, future uses of the sporting and other facilities, cultural diversity and social cohesion, and attracting inward investment.

10. The Government used the estimates of likely costs produced by the Arup report to develop a funding package designed to cover potential risks and contingencies. After considering the evidence the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, Tessa Jowell MP, announced to Parliament in May 2003 the Government's intention to back London's bid for 2012.[7]

11. The bid was carried through by London 2012, a private company limited by guarantee, whose shareholders were the Government, the Greater London Authority and the BOA. In its questionnaire response submitted to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in February 2004, London 2012 set out in detail the transport plans for London's Olympic bid. The full bid documents were prepared and sent to the IOC in November 2004. Theme 14 of the London Candidature File for the 2012 Olympic Bid provided details of the proposed transport arrangements for the Games.[8]

Olympic Games management structure

12. The Government has been quick off the mark in planning for the Olympics. Already the London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill has passed through the House of Commons and has had its Second Reading in the House of Lords.[9]

13. The Bill will create the Olympic Development Authority (ODA), a Non-Departmental Public Body, which will be responsible for ensuring the creation of venues and the construction of infrastructure for the Games. A directorate of the ODA will be responsible for an integrated approach to the preparation and delivery of transport for the Games.

14. The Mayor of London has issued statutory directions to the London Development Agency (LDA) and Transport for London (TfL) to act as the interim ODA and interim Olympic transport team (named Interim Olympic Transport) respectively until the ODA is set up formally after the Bill receives Royal Assent during 2006.[10] The ODA will have a reserve power of direction over TfL, and will also be able to provide funds to other major transport schemes relevant to the Olympics.

15. After we had finished taking evidence, Jack Lemley, the former head of the Anglo-French consortium responsible for building the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, was appointed Chairman of the ODA, with David Higgins as his Chief Executive. David Higgins was previously Chief Executive of English Partnerships and before that Managing Director of the Lend Lease Group in Australia, the company which built the Olympic Village and the Aquatic Centre for the Sydney Olympics, 2000.

16. The London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (LOCOG), the successor body to London 2012, was established formally on 3 October 2005. LOCOG is responsible for planning, organising and staging the 2012 Games. Since we took evidence LOCOG has appointed a new Chief Executive, Paul Deighton, a European financial expert with investment bank Goldman Sachs. He will assume his responsibilities on a full-time basis in March 2006, replacing the current Chief Executive, Sir Keith Mills, who will become vice-Chairman of LOCOG, with Lord Coe as Chairman.

17. The ODA and LOCOG will report to the Olympic Board, which will provide oversight, strategic coordination and monitoring of the entire Olympic Games project:[11]

Venues

18. The venues for thirty out of the thirty eight Olympic sports will be grouped into three zones in or close to central London: the Olympic Park zone at Stratford; the River zone including ExCel, the Dome, Greenwich Arena, the Royal Artillery Barracks, the University of East London, Docklands and Greenwich Park; the Central London zone, including Horse Guards Parade, Hyde Park, Lord's Cricket Ground, and Regents Park.

19. The Olympic Park zone, the venue for fourteen sports, including the main athletics stadium, will consist of a new 500-acre Olympic Park to be created between Hackney Marshes, Stratford and West Ham and within ten minutes walking time from both Stratford Regional and Stratford International stations. The park will be adjacent to the Stratford City Development, a new urban centre for east London, part of which will form the Olympic Village for the Games. Also within Greater London, tennis will take place at Wimbledon and football at Wembley.

20. There are very important venues outside London. The sailing will take place at Weymouth and Portland, cycling at the Weald Country Park, canoeing at Broxbourne, rowing at Eton Dorney, and football at five football stadia.[12]

Importance of transport to the success of an Olympic Games

21. Our evidence from Transport for London (TfL) stressed the primary importance of transport to the Olympic Games. The Olympic Games is the world's largest sporting event with over 200 competing nations, 16,000 athletes and team officials and 38 sports spread over 16 days. This will necessitate the secure and reliable transport of the 55,000 members of the so-called 'Olympic Family' - athletes, officials, media representatives, VIPs and sponsors, and the estimated 9,700,000 ticketed spectators, 500,000 each day to all events. The Paralympic Games is the world's second largest sporting event.[13]

22. Mr Jim Sloman, the former Chief Operating Officer for the Sydney Olympics in 2000, summed up for us the importance of good transport arrangements for athletes, officials, the media and spectators for the success of an Olympic Games:

    The transport system was absolutely crucial to the success of the [Sydney]Olympics. Firstly, you have to get the athletes to the event or you do not have an event, and you have got to get them there on time or the television sponsors, the people who provide the money to the Games for the television rights, will not pay you: so it is crucial that you get the athletes to the event. It is crucial you get the media to the event, the broadcasters to the event, and at the end of the day you must get the spectators to the event on time as well. They are paying a lot of money for a unique experience, and this is the first Olympic Games in London for 60 odd years, and they will want to enjoy it and they will want to remember that experience forever because they probably will not get it again in their lifetime, so transport is a must have, it must work well, it is crucial to the success of the Games. [14]

23. Several witnesses set out for us the dire consequences of poorly organised transport. For example, 'Living Streets', an organisation which promotes walking, told us that "the Atlanta Olympics were plagued by transport problems partly because of the dominance of the motor car in a very sprawling city."[15] We heard that at the same Games there was a problem of getting the competitors to the events in time.[16] Sir Keith Mills, Chief Executive, LOCOG, explained that for the Atlanta, Athens and Sydney Games drivers for the fleets of cars and buses had to be brought in from other parts of the country. Many were unfamiliar with the roads of the Olympic city and this resulted in confusion:

    Both in Atlanta and in Athens the resources of the cities themselves were somewhat limited and they had to bring people in from all over the country to provide driving facilities, and if you come from Perth you probably do not know the roads of Sydney terribly well. [17]

24. It is obvious that without excellent transport the Olympic and Paralympic Games will be at risk of failure. London's reputation as a leading world city will depend largely upon its ability to ensure that appropriate transport infrastructure is in place for the Olympic and Paralympic Games by 2012. The Government and the Mayor of London are the ultimate guarantors of the Games, including essential transport improvements and provision. We expect them to see that these are delivered to specification and to time.

Funding for Olympic transport

PUBLIC FUNDING PACKAGE

25. £2.375 billion, from Lottery money, London council tax, and London Development Agency funding, has been agreed between the Government and the Mayor of London to meet the cost of the Games.[18] We note that in response to a Parliamentary Question about reassessing the cost of the Games, the Government has confirmed that KPMG has been commissioned to provide advice to the Government on those costs."[19]

26. The Government told us that "the total cost of the Olympic specific transport schemes to be met from Olympic funding amounts to £692 million".[20] £508 million (revised to £542 million)" [21] of this total is expected to be met from the £2.375 billion with the remainder, £184 million (revised to £150 million)[22], being met from the operational budget of the Games, although these proportions appear to have varied more recently in a supplementary memorandum from LOCOG .[23]

27. We questioned Transport for London, LOCOG, and the Mayor of London closely about the transport projects which would be completed by 2012 only as a result of the Olympic Games and the additional money provided to the Games by the Government over and above planned UK spending on transport before 2012.[24] Sir Keith Mills, Vice Chairman of LOCOG, told us that this extra money amounted to £692 million.[25] This was broken down as follows: capital investment in infrastructure £340 million, to include schemes such as the upgrade of the North London Line and West Ham station capacity enhancements.[26] It appears that the effect of the extra funding on these projects will be to accelerate their completion to coincide with the timetable for the Games.[27] £202 million, is dedicated to buying "temporary Games-time services",[28] for example, additional train services including the Olympic 'Javelin' shuttle from St Pancras to the Olympic Park at Stratford, and temporary park and ride facilities.[29] The remaining £150 million is a contribution towards transport running costs."

OLYMPIC TRANSPORT RUNNING COSTS

28. The operational budget of the 2012 Olympic Games, estimated to be £1.5 billion, covers the operating costs of running the Games. These costs are met almost entirely from broadcast rights, sponsorship and ticket sales. The LOCOG will not finance any capital expenditure. Of the £1.5 billion LOCOG budget, £150 million is expected to be spent on operational Olympic transport.[30]

KEY TRANSPORT FOR LONDON PROJECTS

29. In its initial assessment of London's Olympic bid the International Olympic Committee (IOC) commented adversely on London's transport. For example "rail public transport is often obsolete and considerable investments must be made to upgrade the existing system in terms of capacity and safety."[31]

30. During the bid process in July 2004, Transport for London agreed long term funding with the Department which allowed it to start an investment programme in transport infrastructure for London amounting to £10 billion over the five years to 2012.[32] This almost certainly helped to convince the IOC that London's infrastructure would be able to meet the needs of the Games:

    During the bid process, substantial London rail transport infrastructure investments have been clearly confirmed, guaranteed and accelerated. Provided that this proposed programme of public transport improvements is fully delivered on schedule before 2012 and the extensive Olympic Route Network is implemented, the Commission believes that London would be capable of coping with Games-time traffic and that Olympic and Paralympic transport requirements would be met.[33]

31. This spending agreement has enabled TfL to accelerate the completion of major projects by 2010, for example, the three DLR extensions and the East London line extension which "TfL...had guaranteed to the [International Olympic Committee]."[34]

DOCKLAND LIGHT RAILWAY EXTENSIONS

32. The Docklands Light Railway (DLR) runs from Bank and Tower Gateway in the City of London through Canary Wharf to the Isle of Dogs and Greenwich, and through Poplar to Stratford and Beckton.

33. An extension from Canning Town DLR to London City Airport and King George V (North Woolwich), opened on 6 December 2005. The estimated cost of the new line, built by City Airport Rail Enterprise (CARE), a consortium of AMEC and the Royal Bank of Scotland, was £140 million. Under a concession arrangement, CARE will be responsible for the maintenance of the railway for a period of approximately thirty years, and for making it available for DLR to operate trains. Two further extensions are planned: the first from King George V to Woolwich Arsenal, the second from Royal Victoria to Stratford International.

KING GEORGE V TO WOOLWICH ARSENAL

34. In April 2004, TfL and DLR Ltd announced that four prospective consortia had been successful in the pre-qualification process to bid for the concession to build the Woolwich extension. In June 2005, Woolwich Arsenal Rail Enterprises (WARE), another consortium formed by AMEC and the Royal Bank of Scotland, was appointed as the concessionaire for thirty years. The estimated cost is £150 million and construction started in Summer 2005. This extension is expected to open in 2009.

ROYAL VICTORIA TO STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL

35. The aim of the Royal Victoria to Stratford International extension is to link up the DLR with the CTRL at Stratford International. The 5km extension will link with DLR's Beckton and London City Airport routes. There will be new stations built at Star Lane, Abbey Road and Stratford High Street. Existing North London line stations at Canning Town, West Ham and Stratford will be modified, and a new station will be opened at Stratford International. It is expected to open in 2010.

DOCKLAND LIGHT RAILWAY CAPACITY UPGRADE

36. DLR Ltd has also proposed upgrading capacity of the railway on the Bank-Lewisham route. In October 2005, DLR Ltd received approval under the Transport and Works Act 1992 (TWA) to undertake construction works on the route between Bank/Tower Gateway and Lewisham. These works will entail lengthening platforms, strengthening some viaducts and bridges, and also providing additional lifts and other improvements in order to give the DLR the ability to run three-car trains. Construction is expected to start on April 2007. Provision has been included for eighteen new vehicles and expansion of the Beckton depot. Drawing on more than £100 million of Transport for London's five-year £10 billion Investment Programme, the project should see new trains on the network by Autumn 2009 and twenty four vehicles have already been ordered. A separate contract for the expansion of the DLR depot at Beckton was finalised recently.

EAST LONDON LINE PROJECT

37. The East London Line (ELL) project will extend and upgrade the existing London Underground East London Line, converting it into a new metrostyle (National Rail) train service. This will provide services that will ultimately extend north to Highbury & Islington, south to West Croydon and west to Clapham Junction, and in the future could potentially facilitate 'orbital' journeys around London.

38. The project will be delivered in two phases, of which the first phase only is due to be completed in time for the Olympic Games. Phase one will extend the existing line north to Dalston Junction and south to Crystal Palace and West Croydon. It is due to be completed by June 2010 and to cost £900 million. In November 2004 the Mayor of London took control of the ELL project and financing will come from TfL's five-year investment programme. Funding has yet to be agreed for the second phase which will extend the ELL west to Clapham Junction and connect North London Line stations at Canonbury and Highbury & Islington, but TfL does not consider it to be crucial for Olympic transport.[35]

LONDON UNDERGROUND JUBILEE LINE CAPACITY INCREASE

39. The Jubilee Line runs from Stratford in East London through Canary Wharf, Waterloo and Baker Street to Wembley and Stanmore in North London. All Jubliee Line trains have had an extra seventh carriage added from January 2006 boosting passenger capacity on each train by seventeen per cent. These measures will increase capacity by nearly twenty per cent on the whole Line, equating to an extra 3,000 passengers every morning and evening peak. The Jubilee Line will also receive a full line upgrade to increase capacity in 2009. London Underground upgrades are discussed in more detail later in the report.[36]

40. It is too early to conclude that the budget for the Olympics is right. But the Government has boosted the money available to enable the Docklands Light Railway and first phase of the East London Line extension to be completed, and that is welcome. We are heartened that the former Chief Operating Officer for the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games considered that, overall, funding for the London Games was "possibly the best Olympic budget" he had seen at this stage.[37] The Olympic transport budget will be a matter for the Olympic Delivery Authority and the successors of Interim Olympic Transport. We expect then to implement excellent financial planning systems and to ensure sound stewardship of public money. This does not however absolve the Government from responsibility for overseeing carefully the financial health of the Olympic transport budget in the coming years. We expect it to be fully alert to problems and to step in quickly where difficulties arise.


6   A summary of the report was deposited in the House of Commons Library in November 2002, Dep 02/2202. Arup, 'London Olympics 2012 Costs and Benefits', 21 May 2002 Back

7   HC Deb, 15 May 2003, cols 477-8 Back

8   http://www.london2012.org/NR/rdonlyres/C27233BA-E663-4FD8-8EC8-A7896B547EFD/0/Theme_14_transport.pdf Back

9   HL Deb, 11 January 2006, cols 250-253 Back

10   Ev 73 Back

11   Diagram, London 2012 Back

12   Maps, Annex Back

13   Visit notes, Annex Back

14   Q 203 Back

15   Ev 61 Back

16   Presentation by Interim Olympic Transport and LOCOG at Stratford Back

17   Q 248 Back

18   Ev 89. London's Olympic Candidature file (Theme 14) refers to $30 billion "already committed to improve London's transport" by 2012, Table 14.1, pp 99-100. This figure however includes all private and public funding identified and forthcoming within this period for all transport modes and needs to be carefully distinguished from the specific Olympic budgets for transport  Back

19   HC Deb, 26 January 2006, col 2296W Back

20   Ev 89 Back

21   Ev 89 Back

22   Ev 89 Back

23   Ev 84. Figures provided slightly later from LOCOG, Transport for London and the Mayor of London contain variations: the operational budget contribution being £150 million, with £542 million coming from the overall public funding package of £2.375 billion Back

24   Q 245 Back

25   Ev 78, Q 245 Back

26   Ev 84-5 Back

27   Q 245 Back

28   Ev 85 Back

29   Ev 85 Back

30   Ev 84 Back

31   Report by the IOC Candidature Acceptance Working Group to the IOC Executive Board, March 2004 Back

32   Ev 72 Back

33   Report of the IOC Evaluation Commission for the Games of the XXX Olympiad in 2012, 6 June 2005 Back

34   Ev 89 Back

35   Q 235 Back

36   Paras 150-156 Back

37   Q 209 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 March 2006