Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


APPENDIX 9

Memorandum submitted by the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee (DPTAC) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the House of Commons Transport Committee investigation How Fair Are The Fares? Train Fares And Ticketing.

  2.  DPTAC was set up under the Transport Act 1985 to advise the Government on disabled people's transport needs. We aim to ensure that disabled people can go where everyone else goes, easily and without extra cost. We would like to see this happen by 2020.

  3.  The absence of accessible, affordable and available transport means that disabled people are less able to secure and retain employment, obtain medical treatment, enjoy a full social and recreational life, or travel with whom they want, where they want and when they want. Compared to others, disabled travellers are likely to plan further ahead, use more effort, pay more to travel, spend more time, experience embarrassment and stigmatisation, and find themselves more tired at the end of a journey. This will crucially affect their confidence and preparedness to travel in future.

  4.  DPTAC uses four overarching principles as the basis for its advice to Government, other organisations and disabled people. These are that:

    —  Accessibility for disabled people is a condition of any investment;

    —  Accessibility for disabled people must be a mainstream activity;

    —  Users should be involved in determining accessibility;

    —  Providers are responsible for achieving accessibility for disabled people.

  5.  These principles are the basis of DPTAC's response to consultations. In this response we will focus on the failings of the existing ticketing and fares systems for disabled people, and suggest some improvements.

SPECIFIC RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION

Disabled Persons Railcard

  6.  The general concession for a disabled person is a reduction of one third for someone holding a Disabled Persons Railcard, and for one companion. The card costs £14 annually. A child with a Disabled Persons Railcard pays the full child fare and an accompanying adult receives a one-third concession. The card is available to a wide range of disabled people, but only a small proportion of the 11 million or so adults who are covered by the Disability Discrimination Act.

  7.  Some 70,000 disabled passengers possessed a Disabled Person's Railcard, and used it to make 1.8 million passenger journeys in 2004-05. This generated £10.5 million income for the rail industry. However, the Disabled Persons Railcard offers no discount to travellers purchasing season tickets, special offers from train companies such as Apex, excursions or charter trains. The exclusion of season tickets is particularly unfair to those disabled people who are seeking greater independence, self reliance and to contribute to the state through full or part time employment.

Other concessions

  8.  Some disabled people are entitled to other concessions. For example, a person registered as visually impaired and not in possession of a Disabled Persons Railcard, who travels with a companion, is entitled to a 34% concession for both people, rising to a 50% concession for a day return ticket. The same person travelling alone however receives no concession whatsoever. However, that person would , unlike a Disabled Persons Railcard holder, obtain the 34% reduction, including for their companion, when buying a season ticket. Travellers who have to stay in their own wheelchair for the journey receive this same concession for themselves for single and return tickets, but not in respect of season tickets.

  9.  This complex arrangement means that it is difficult for a disabled person to know what is the most cost effective way for them to travel. DPTAC recommends the introduction of a simpler and clearer system.

Training and competence of ticket office staff

  10.  Given this level of complexity, it is perhaps not surprising that some staff issuing tickets are not aware of the fare options available to disabled people, and therefore are not well placed to advise them. For example it has come to our attention that some staff at London stations selling network rail tickets do not appreciate that a disabled person holding a Freedom Pass receives free travel in the London area, and so only pays (at a two thirds or half rate depending on their disability) for the non-London part of their journey. A companion simply receives the one-third reduction for the whole trip (unless they are in possession of a railcard of some kind themselves). As a result, it is not uncommon for disabled people to pay different amounts on different days for the same journey, depending on the competence and training of the staff on duty on a particular day.

  11.  We are also aware of occasions when ticket issuing staff do not know how to use equipment, such as induction loops, that have been made available to assist communication with disabled people.

Ticket machines

  12.  For some years, ticket issuing machines have provided facilities for holders of some concessionary passes such as students to obtain discounts but have often failed to do so for disabled people. Recently we have seen considerable improvements in the availability and distribution of ticket issuing machines that can deal with Disabled Persons Railcards (though not with the other disabled people's concessions we have described).

  13.  However, significant numbers of machines, including some newer ones, continue to present problems to some disabled people because of the design and positioning of the screen, controls and audible prompts. In addition, they may not offer all the discounts to which disabled people are entitled.

Telephone booking and information services

  14.  There remains some inconsistency in the delivery of the range of information and ticketing services. Some call centres do and others do not sell tickets. An increasing number, but by no means all, are free to call, but some remain local or national rate numbers. Consistency of provision and the availability of free telephone numbers would be helpful to all, particularly to disabled customers, for some of whom other options such as the internet, may not be available, as we explain in paragraph 17 below.

Link between telephone booking and Assisted Passenger Reservations Service

  15.  The Assisted Passenger Reservations Service provides support to passengers who need help boarding and disembarking at stations. It would greatly benefit disabled people if they were able to book their tickets and any assistance that they needed at the same time with a single call. At present, the two systems are not linked in this way by most rail service providers. Even when the Assisted Passenger Reservations Service and the ticket ordering system are linked, we are aware of instances where the helpline was not able or prepared to provide assistance a disabled person having to cope with a substitute bus service that was not accessible to them.

On train booking services

  16.  Train operating companies vary in the way in which they make discounts available to those who purchase their tickets on the train rather than at stations or in advance. Some companies will not offer tickets with discounts for disabled people on the train, unless the ticket office and issuing equipment at the station of departure are not operational. In practice it may be much harder for a disabled person to get to a train station in time to purchase a ticket in advance, so this may lead to discrimination against disabled people.

Internet booking services

  17.  In order to encourage greater use of the internet for booking, some train operating companies only sell some discounted fares on the internet. This can help disabled people to secure bargain tickets. The internet rail ticket booking systems that we have tested do permit a disabled person to book with a Travelcard. However, some do not permit the reduced price ticket entitlement without a railcard that we have explained in paragraph 8 above that some disabled people are entitled to. In addition there are cases where people, including disabled people, using certain computer hardware or software, are not able to make use of the on-line booking system and the discounts if offers.

Website accessibility

  18.  We are also concerned about website accessibility for some disabled people. The website for the Disabled Persons Travelcard (http://www.disabledpersons-railcard.co.uk/) is an example of good practice. Each page offers options to change the font and colour of text, to hear the contents of the page and to navigate using selected keys. It also conforms to Bobby and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.

  19.  Many train operating companies do not offer this level of accessibility in their on line ticket ordering systems. This is consistent with the findings of the Disability Rights Commission's 2005 wider investigation into website accessibility[6] which recommended that "service providers using websites . . . should urgently improve the accessibility and usability of the services they provide through the medium of the Web."

Conclusion

  20.  DPTAC welcomes a number of improvements to the accessibility of ticketing systems. However we must draw the Committee's attention to the further work that needs to take place to create a simple system of concessions, uniformly administered throughout the railway system, and accessibly available through all means of ticket purchase.

3 October 2005





6   http://www.drc-gb.org/publicationsandreports/report.asp Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 19 May 2006