Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


APPENDIX 14

Memorandum submitted by Mr Julian J Berry

1.  REMIT AND POWERS

  With the continued —and continuing—increase in European regulation of aviation within the UK, primarily through EASA, the role of the CAA must change to reflect it.

  The powers granted to the CAA should also incorporate some form of external and independent appeals structure; the current situation where the CAA is judge, jury and executioner is intolerable.

2. PERFORMANCE

  The CAA has been far too heavy handed with the regulation of General Aviation (GA) in the UK, using the mantra of safety" as their raison d'e(r)tre. However, this regulation has not been proportionate to the risks involved with (GA), leading to an industry sector being burdened unnecessarily.

  Several examples spring to mind, including the failure to recognise the ICAO compliant FAA Instrument Rating, and the reluctance to accept modifications previously certified by other ICAO regulators (such as FAA STCs). Both of these issues manifestly reduce the safe conduct of many UK GA flights.

  The future CAA should spend far more time and effort in promoting safe and expeditious GA activity than they have in the past, rather than just looking at ways in which to say No, you can't do that".

3.  EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CAA'S REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

  I would argue that, whilst the CAA has undoubtedly overseen an extremely safe aviation sector in the UK, this has been done in a heavy-handed, over zealous and disproportionate way. I would also argue that the same results could have been achieved by a more practical & pragmatic approach to regulation.

4.  EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CAA'S DISCHARGE OF ITS DUTIES

  By concentrating too much on why something can not be allowed" that CAA have failed to promote the benefit of GA to UK PLC. The CAA have failed to ensure all users have an equal right of access to many regional airports—so vital for business travel—by allowing these airports to charge punitive and disproportionate user fees. The CAA has failed to keep up with technological advances, such as authorising GPS approach procedures, unlike many other national regulatory bodies.

5.  EUROPEAN CO -OPERATION AND ENVIRONMENT

  I have no comments to make in this section.

7 November 2005



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 8 November 2006