Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 20-39)

MR STEPHEN HICKEY, MISS ROSEMARY THEW, MR CLIVE BENNETT, MR PAUL MARKWICK AND MR STEPHEN TETLOW

8 FEBRUARY 2006

  Q20  Chairman: We have got the caveat; start with the answer.

  Mr Hickey: The answer is around £45 million. The range we are currently quoting is between £44 and £49.5 million.

  Q21  Chairman: Out of a budget of?

  Mr Hickey: The total departmental budget—

  Q22  Chairman: No, the DVO budget.

  Mr Hickey: This is not just DVO; it is a departmental project.

  Q23  Chairman: So the money comes from the Department and will not come off your individual budgets?

  Mr Hickey: The Department will have to provide the up-front investment. It crosses the whole Department, including the DfT centre, the Highways Agency, the MCA, and now we have got the Government Car and Despatch Agency as well.

  Q24  Chairman: I am a bit worried about this phrase "self-serving". Quite apart from the fact it does not seem to me to be a very tactful phrase, what logistical difficulties are the Agencies going to have if you have got non-desk-based staff involved in this new system of self-serving?

  Mr Hickey: There are clearly issues there and we will need to work through those but the options include where we need to have the continued use of paper and then collecting the paper in and scanning it—

  Q25  Chairman: No, no, wait a minute, I understand that. We are talking about saving a vast sum on this particular thing and it seems to be being done on the basis of people in a sense self-certifying. I hope I am not using the wrong words.

  Mr Hickey: At the moment the typical process is that I or a member of staff, if I want to for example claim travel and subsistence or something, have to do something. Typically I fill in a form on a bit of paper.

  Q26  Chairman: Yes, that is right, you have to actually explain, like Members of Parliament do, what you have spent the money on. It is not an unreasonable question when it is public money, is it?

  Mr Hickey: Indeed, and I then send this piece of paper to a finance division or an HR division or somewhere and somebody gets this bit of paper and they take that bit of paper and they do something. They put it into the computer, it does the algorithms, and out at the end, hopefully, pops my payment. The self-service idea is to try, where we can, to cut through that, to cut out the middle man. I put in my claim on the screen. If I have not got a screen—and you are quite right there are staff who have not got access to screens—we have to use a more Heath Robinson approach. There are some ideas that are downstream, and Rosemary has responsibility for this, not just in this but in other areas, things like digital pens that bridge that gap, but this is all to be developed.

  Q27  Chairman: I understand that but you are telling us what the savings are going to be and then saying, "Well of course, we have still got to develop the mechanisms by which we can guarantee it can be done."

  Mr Hickey: Most of the savings are in the HR and finance functions, not in the frontline, if you see what I mean.

  Chairman: I see. Mrs Ellman?

  Q28  Mrs Ellman: We are told that there is inconsistency in terms and conditions for the staff in the different Agencies. How serious a problem is that?

  Mr Hickey: Well, it is deliberate. It is not accidental because back in the 1990s or earlier, I cannot remember when, responsibility for pay and conditions was delegated to individual Agencies, again across the whole service, not just here. So they have over time, as you would expect, diverged to some extent. At the moment our judgment is that that is okay. It is not a serious obstacle to delivering what we have to deliver, so we are continuing as a department not just in the DVO Group with the presumption that we will carry on with delegated pay bargaining.

  Q29  Mrs Ellman: Has that caused any friction?

  Mr Hickey: The unions do not like it. The unions are pressing quite strongly for national bargaining. Actually their argument is ideally they would like Civil Service-wide national bargaining, as used to exist back in the 1970s and early 1980s. Failing that, they would like each department to do bargaining at their level and, failing that, they would like the DVO to do the bargaining. So their preference would be the Treasury does the bargaining.

  Q30  Chairman: It is not just that though. Is it really true that you have not got a DfT-wide intranet?

  Mr Hickey: There is not. The joining-upness is rather limited at the moment.

  Q31  Chairman: The "joining-upness"? Now, Mr Hickey, that is almost as good as my assistant who said this week he did not want to "big himself up". I think we will stick with English if it is all right with you. Do you have a DfT staff directory or an email directory?

  Mr Hickey: No.

  Q32  Chairman: Do you have common IT systems?

  Mr Hickey: No.

  Q33  Chairman: So the co-operation is not at what you might call a high level?

  Mr Hickey: There is an awful lot more opportunity; you are entirely right.

  Chairman: Thank you. Sorry, Mrs Ellman, they have a lot of opportunity and Mr Hickey is going to tell you what it is, perhaps.

  Q34  Mrs Ellman: How do you see the balance between enforcers and service providers in relation to the Agencies?

  Mr Hickey: It is not either/or; it is both. We clearly have to do both things and what we aim to do is to do the enforcement because we are at the end of the day heavily into enforcement. That is ultimately why we exist. We are there to regulate certain things and to make sure that certain things happen. Our aim is to do so in a way which minimises the burden, if I can use that word, the hassle factor, whatever you want to call it, on people who are perfectly legitimate and complying with their obligations and all that and to come down hard on those who are not. So what we are trying to do is both. The other thing we think is that by being more customer friendly, and I apologise for using this jargon but you will understand—

  Q35  Chairman: If I do not, Mr Hickey, I shall ask you to translate.

  Mr Hickey: —by trying to present our services in ways which are as accessible and easy to use and friendly to customers as we can, that will actually help people to comply, because the people who do not comply with regulations and so on tend to fall into two broad groups. There are people who just do not get around to it, possibly partly deliberately, but with a bit more help if it was a bit easier, they might just tip over, and then there are the much more hardened people who are definitely into heavy-duty evasion. The category of people who can be helped over the boundary by services which are more accessible and easier to use, et cetera, reduces the total amount of work of the DVO and it can go into tackling those who are choosing not to comply much more deliberately.

  Q36  Mrs Ellman: Do you have the right mix and numbers of staff to carry out the changing role?

  Mr Hickey: The right mix?

  Q37  Mrs Ellman: Yes.

  Mr Hickey: No-one would ever say they had the right resources for anything because we could always do with more and you could always change the mix. I think we are trying to shift the focus of our staff resources, and Mr Tetlow at VOSA can talk a little bit about what he is doing to try to free up resource and within that to put more resource on the frontline, as it were, in terms of tackling operators who are evading the rules and so on, so that balance is one that we are seeking actively to manage and improve.

  Q38  Mrs Ellman: Concerns have been expressed to us that you do not have enough staff to deal with enforcement particularly as enforcement is becoming increasingly important. Is that a concern to you?

  Mr Hickey: I, like anyone, would always happily have more staff. It would be foolish not to say that and we are of course under pressure on our head count and all sorts of different things, so the efficiency drive is quite an important one for us. What we are trying to do is to use efficiency savings not only to achieve absolute savings, because that is right and proper, but also to free up resources for high priority things, and that does include enforcement and, as I say, Stephen could talk about in VOSA in particular how that is being done.

  Q39  Mr Clelland: Does that mean you are under-staffed? You gave us a long answer but what is the answer to the question?

  Mr Hickey: The answer is that we, like anyone coming in front of you would say, could always use more staff.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 27 July 2006