Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 260-275)

MR STEPHEN HICKEY, MISS ROSEMARY THEW, MR CLIVE BENNETT, MR PAUL MARKWICK AND MR STEPHEN TETLOW

8 FEBRUARY 2006

  Q260  Mrs Ellman: You had a debtor, £8 million. What was that in respect of?

  Miss Thew: I am not sure.

  Q261  Mrs Ellman: In the annual accounts 2004-05.

  Miss Thew: I do not know what the debtor is, I am afraid.

  Q262  Chairman: It is payment of implementation costs on the theory tests contract. It went from nil to £8 million, which is interesting.

  Mr Hickey: If it was in relation to the theory test contract, it was a residual dispute between the previous contract, Prometric, and the DSA about whether or not the DSA was or was not liable for some payments after the contract technically ended. They claimed that DSA owed them for some period after the contract ended. That dispute has now been resolved, and I think that figure has not been realised.

  Q263  Chairman: We need a little note on that too, please. I am giving you lots of homework so you do not get bored.

  Mr Hickey: Yes.

  Q264  Mrs Ellman: Will you have a surplus or deficit in 2005-06?

  Miss Thew: We will have a surplus. The reason for the surplus is we had anticipated that we would have more sites purchased for multi-purpose test centres. This is as a result of the European legislation which requires us to do different testing for motor cycles and our anticipation was that we would have 20 sites during the course of 2005-06. In fact those have not come into fruition and that has resulted in our surplus.

  Q265  Mrs Ellman: What level of contingency does it maintain?

  Miss Thew: Contingency for the testing sites, do you mean?

  Q266  Chairman: IF you are moving from deficit to surplus, what degree?

  Miss Thew: We are in surplus already, we are not moving from deficit to surplus.

  Q267  Mrs Ellman: You have a contingency provision?

  Miss Thew: I am not sure what figure you are referring to here.

  Q268  Chairman: We have some bottom line figures, have we not? We want to know why you planned surpluses and deficits in such a way that although you say you will breakeven over the long term, and although you say you are now in surplus, you did record deficits in 2003-04, 2004-05. These were presumably planned deficits, were they not?

  Miss Thew: We have been in surplus for a number of years. Our plan, as the multi-purpose test centres roll-out, is that we will get into deficit. It was intended at one point that would happen in 2004-05 and 2005-06 but in fact, because of delays, it has not happened.

  Q269  Mrs Ellman: Your payroll has increased significantly?

  Miss Thew: Yes, it has.

  Q270  Mrs Ellman: A 12% increase expected?

  Miss Thew: Yes, that is the result of increased investment in driving examiners. Because of demand we have recruited some additional driving examiners in order to be able to meet the six-week target. The payroll and pension costs have increased as a result.

  Q271  Chairman: I think we are going to send you a little note with a few more questions, Miss Thew.

  Miss Thew: Of course.

  Q272  Chairman: I am sorry we have allowed you to relax under the impression that you have escaped, that is not necessarily the case. Mr Hickey, I do genuinely want to say thank you to you and your colleagues because you have been very tolerant, very kind, hard working. I think that for us this is a very important investigation because we need to know your DVO is working efficiently, we need to know that all of your component parts are firing on all cylinders, which is I hope the right thing to say with a group of particular agencies, but I think, also, that because we do rely on you right the way across the board, and because you do throw up so many very important issues, it has been quite helpful. I did want to ask you, but I will write to you about it, about the numbers of vehicles that were recalled, because I was a bit surprised to see that in the 12 months up until 2005 1,000,009 vehicles were recalled because of concerns about defects which could lead to injury and death. That is the highest ever number, more than 250% up on the previous year. Do we know why that is?

  Mr Hickey: Not offhand.

  Mr Markwick: I think it is reflecting the increasing complexity of vehicles and vehicle systems.

  Q273  Chairman: Forgive me, Mr Markwick, the Committee are told vehicles are becoming more efficient. Unlike the times when I started out married life pushing cars, we are told now it is all very efficient and it all works.

  Mr Markwick: I do not think anyone could challenge that today's vehicles are far safer than they were 20 years ago. Within that there is a lot more complexity. I think some of the terminology may be a little bit overstated because many of the wrinkles are not absolute crash-bang safety issues but they are upgrades of software, for example.

  Q274  Chairman: I do think we need a note on that.

  Mr Hickey: Sure.

  Q275  Chairman: We would like to know why so many vehicles are coming out of factories with significant design defects. I am grateful to you all. Thank you very much indeed for coming. You all get special gold stars on your Civil Service records.

  Mr Hickey: Can we ask for that to be recorded!

  Chairman: Not bonuses, just gold stars!





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 27 July 2006