Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 160-175)

CHIEF INSPECTOR JAN BERRY AND CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT DEREK BARNETT

8 MARCH 2006

  Q160  Chairman: If local authorities decide to halt or reduce speed camera operations following the change in funding arrangements do you think police forces will respond by taking up that role?

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: Presumably you are talking about the change in the funding for cameras. Again, I think it is too early to say. There is a concern from some of my colleagues. We welcome the change in funding because that sends a message out that speed enforcement is not a profit-making event and I think that is absolutely right. The concern we have is that we do not want to be left with the rump of all the enforcement without the support of the funding that comes with it.

  Q161  Chairman: What lessons have been learned from the camera partnerships? Any?

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: Some very good lessons have been learned in terms of when partners work together with a common cause they are very effective. That is not new. That has gone on for many years. There is an issue that some of the camera partnerships have perhaps taken a lot of the energy away from some of the less technology-focused partnerships, particularly engineering and particularly education as well, but overall I think the partnerships have worked well. Think the scheme has worked well. There is just a concern about whether the new funding arrangements will hit the service.

  Q162  Chairman: Do you think the multi-agency co-operation will continue or do you think the funding will destroy that?

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: I think it will continue and it is demonstrated in our own force area. We talked about motorcycles earlier on this afternoon. When local authorities, the police and the emergency services put their efforts together to tackle a problem a lot can be achieved.

  Q163  Chairman: Should we police our motorways with speed cameras?

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: We do already, certainly at road works.

  Q164  Chairman: It is not quite the same thing as having them on the M6 at rush hour, is it?

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: No, it is not.

  Q165  Chairman: I mean, if it is the Thelwall viaduct you do not have a problem because nobody moves.

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: Yes. I think there is a case that the time/distance cameras would be effective on motorways. The issue would be, I guess, making sure the public were aware of that in a way that they are probably not now.

  Q166  Chairman: Do you think we are getting too reliant on cameras?

  Chief Inspector Berry: That is what I was saying earlier on, that you have to have a mix between technology and human beings. I am not saying that we have got too many cameras. I think they are about right, provided they are used intelligently, but we need to have that human resource that works alongside those cameras. Can I go back to a point that was made about the camera partnerships? It is very often determined by the personalities within those partnerships making them work. There are some brilliant partnerships where the funding will not really make an awful lot of difference. It will help, it will encourage and it will help them to be very creative but there are other ones where it will not work because the personalities do not work. We need to have a mechanism of being able to identify where those partnerships are not working to make them more effective.

  Q167  Chairman: Does that not bring us back to your point about training? I am really a bit appalled because I had not taken on board the fact that there was a very structured training system. One of the arguments we have had about the PCSOs and about traffic management officers is precisely that there is an enormous difference between a trained police officer, who is now not the cheapest of commodities in our national exchequer, and those who are very focused on a much lower level, who are much more restricted. Do both your Associations put very strongly to government the need for a continuing process of training throughout a police career because, you will forgive my saying so, Chief Inspector, the Federation is frequently accused of being anti-new technology, anti-changes in working practices, and surely one of the lessons to be learned from what you have been saying is that this is partly because of the structure of the existing training system?

  Chief Inspector Berry: Absolutely. As I said, when you join you receive reasonable training. That training is then developed with experience. It is that refresher training that is so important and that is missing from us at the moment.

  Q168  Chairman: Would that be helped if you had in a sense a focus on a roads policing unit?

  Chief Inspector Berry: Roads policing units will benefit from being trained to undertake the role that they are undertaking. Earlier today I was involved in discussions which hopefully will improve the professional development of all officers, both through qualifications and the accreditation framework within the Police Service, but people have to see training and development as an investment, not as an abstraction, and that is one of the difficulties in policing at the moment.

  Q169  Chairman: What happens if somebody realises that the officers doing the job have not got sufficient skills to undertake a full range of traffic duties?

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: It is not the case that there is not training or that it is not of a high standard.

  Q170  Chairman: No, I was not suggesting that.

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: The problem is that it is patchy and it depends upon each force, each chief constable, as to what extent specialist officers will exist in the first place and the level of training they get. At some levels in terms of investigation, in terms of the Road Death Investigation Manual, there are some very highly trained officers. I would hate to believe that that was not the case but it is patchy and the fear I have is that if you have an officer going to the scene of a serious collision and that officer is not sufficiently trained and aware of how to protect himself or herself and the public and how to gather evidence then we are falling down in our duty.

  Q171  Chairman: Supposing we had got a case like that. What action would a senior officer take?

  Chief Inspector Berry: This is where the Police Service needs to be a learning organisation because we do not always get it right but we have to look at incidents and make sure that we can learn from them, so if there are safety issues that come out of how a person has dealt with the scene of an incident then we need to make sure that this does not become a sanction and hit them round the head but that we try and learn and develop to make sure we do not do it again. Police officers have learned in their lives from not dealing appropriately with the scene of an incident and we need to make sure that we learn from that particular process. Motorways and other roads are hugely dangerous places and we need to make sure people are skilled to operate in that environment.

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: I think senior officers are aware of that. Recently in my own force in Cheshire I was made aware that there were some officers who had moved from criminal investigation work into roads policing work and they had not been trained, and we were able very quickly to identify that and almost immediately, overnight, put in some mechanisms to put that right.

  Q172  Chairman: But, Chief Superintendent, with 43 different forces all behaving like individual prima donnas, with each chief constable having his own patch and doing his own little thing—and they are mostly "he's"—

  Chief Inspector Berry: There are national standards and what the Police Federation and I know the Police Superintendents' Association have said for some time now is that those national standards have to be met. It should not be down to luck as to which force you happen to be in with regard to what quality of training you get.

  Q173  Chairman: Are you really telling me that even the inspectorate would not automatically pick up on the speed at which that level of training has been instituted and that kind of problem has been solved?

  Chief Inspector Berry: I think it has been given far more consideration today than maybe it was two or three years ago.

  Q174  Chairman: I just want to ask you one more question before you escape. Have you faced any problems getting local authorities to make CCTV footage available for crash investigation?

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: I am not aware of any occasions when that has happened.

  Chief Inspector Berry: I am not aware of any.

  Q175  Chairman: Supposing local authorities and anyone else holding recorded evidence of collisions needed to make it available to the police, are you of the opinion that that is going to be quite possible?

  Chief Superintendent Barnett: Yes.

  Chief Inspector Berry: I am certainly of that opinion.

  Chairman: Can I say that, whatever our questions, we are very aware of the good job that you do and we are very grateful to you both for coming. Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 31 October 2006