Select Committee on Trade and Industry Written Evidence


APPENDIX 3

Memorandum by the British Nuclear Group

BACKGROUND

  1.  The creation of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) to provide a focus on cleaning up and decommissioning the UK's nuclear legacy is something that British Nuclear Group wholeheartedly support.

  2.  On 1 April 2005 the NDA assumed ownership of a substantial portion of the UK's civil nuclear assets and liabilities and contracts were placed with British Nuclear Group and the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) to operate assets and manage liabilities until such time as full commercial competition could be introduced.

  3.  British Nuclear Group worked with the NDA to develop challenging but effective incumbent contracts. The creation of the NDA has accelerated the development of stronger programme and financial control over the capital and operating costs of nuclear sites. In addition we worked with the NDA to develop Near Term Work Plans (NTWPs) and a Lifecycle Baselines (LCBLs). These documents set out details of work that will be performed to operate, decommission and clean-up sites. The LCBL sets out the long-term objectives for each site. The NTWP is an in-depth view of the next two or three years of the LCBL and sets out a detailed plan of all activities which British Nuclear Group will perform in that period. The NTWP describes the scope and programme of services to be provided, analysed by category of service, the budgeted cost of works scheduled (BCWS) per category, the assumptions and qualifications underpinning the BCWS and the overall funding limit for the site. Developing detailed procedures to deliver programmes and rigorous cost controls would have been necessary for the appropriate running of any project based company and the creation of the NDA gave us the focus to prioritise this "transformation" work.

  4.  Prior to and since the NDA assumed ownership of BNFL's sites and facilities, many British Nuclear Group people who clearly have extensive understanding and experience of the issues and competing priorities are supporting and assisting the NDA. Our experience of nuclear decommissioning and operations is without rival in the UK and we look forward to continuing to deploy this expertise for the benefit of the NDA in achieving its challenging objectives.

  5.  We are committed to ensuring that the activities funded by the NDA are carried out in a safe, secure and environmentally acceptable way. Our goal is to carry out our programmes of work with the smallest possible impact on the environment. Whilst value for money is, quite rightly, the focus of the NDA, safety remains the key criterion by which the success of our industry will be judged.

DRIVERS FOR CREATING THE NDA

  6.  The Government had clear objectives for the creation of the NDA. Whilst BNFL and the UKAEA had made progress in managing the nuclear legacy it was felt that the scale and nature of the task required a much stronger and sharper strategic focus. The NDA was created with a specific remit to ensure the nuclear legacy is cleaned up safely, securely and cost effectively and in ways which protect the environment for the benefit of current and future generations. In the White Paper `Managing the Nuclear Legacy: A Strategy for Action 2002', the NDA's guiding principles are articulated as delivery to high safety, security and environmental standards; best value for money; openness and transparency and competition so as to make the best possible use of the best available skills.

  7.  British Nuclear Group is clear that the Government's objectives are being carried forward effectively by the NDA with strong evidence of these themes being woven into contracts, Near Term Work Plans (NTWPs), Lifecycle Baselines (LCBLs), performance targets and general oversight conducted by the NDA.

NDA'S ACCOUNTABILITY

  8. It is clear that there has been a `step-change' in the approach to and the work now being conducted on behalf of the NDA. Clear direction from the NDA as our customer allows British Nuclear Group to focus purely on their priority of operations and clean-up without diverted by broader debates including that of replacement nuclear build. We have also devoted time to explaining our changing role—from owner to contractor—to a myriad of stakeholders and there is now a growing recognition of the focused approach provided by NDA.

  9.  The Energy Act establishes a requirement on the NDA to prepare a strategy for carrying out its functions; an annual plan for each financial year which must be submitted to, and approved by, Ministers; and an annual report at the end of each financial year to be submitted to the Secretary of State and laid before Parliament. In addition the NDA is, by its very nature, subject to the scrutiny of independent bodies such as the Trade & Industry Select Committee. As an exercise in transparency of accountability this has demonstrated to all parties the context in which the NDA is operating and the expectations placed upon it.

NDA PERFORMANCE

  10.  British Nuclear Group recognises that the NDA is still less than one year old and so the organisation is newly formed and not yet fully resourced. Nevertheless, within a relatively short period the NDA has delivered a comprehensive draft strategy for public consultation which gives a clearer picture of its priorities and intentions, enabling British Nuclear Group to better align with our customer's expectations and direct our skills accordingly. The strategy also articulates the NDA's enthusiasm to substantially accelerate decommissioning and clean-up. British Nuclear Group is responding to this direction by delivering plans for effective acceleration across the portfolio of sites it manages.

VALUE FOR MONEY

  11.  With the strategic focus accompanying the NDA on the priorities in UK decommissioning and clean-up, British Nuclear Group has already delivered substantial cost and time savings in relation to the nuclear legacy. These range from several million in the short term to potentially several billion pounds in the longer term and directly benefit the UK taxpayer. So whilst it may be too early to conduct a clinical value-for-money audit on the NDA, it is clear that the existence, approach and focus of this organisation have helped to deliver substantial reductions in nuclear clean-up costs and timescales within its first year of existence.

  12.  In parallel to these tangible savings for the UK taxpayer, there are a number of broader benefits that have been derived from the introduction of the NDA regime. Perhaps most notable amongst these is the metamorphosis of British Nuclear Group from a traditional owner-operator of UK nuclear sites to a company becoming a full player in the developing commercial clean-up market. This has been achieved through an innovative, fresh approach coupled with an injection of new skills such as programme management, evolution of the supply chain, developing bid capability and customer focus. These skills alongside the many talents that existed in the group are in the process of achieving a significant transformation in the UK nuclear clean-up market place creating the commencement of a positive outcome for the UK.

CONCLUSION

  13.  In summary, whilst recognising that the NDA remains a fledgling organisation, British Nuclear Group has witnessed tangible benefits derived from having a single-minded customer for nuclear decommissioning and clean-up in the UK. We believe that a clear framework of accountability and strongly articulated priorities are already resulting in the delivery of better value for the taxpayer in terms of operations, decommissioning and clean-up.

  14.  British Nuclear Group is determined to respond and adapt through innovation and with the applications of our unrivalled skills, experience and perspective to release further value for the NDA in this market—both reducing timescales & current cost profiles identified in the initial plans.

27 January 2006


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 August 2006