Select Committee on Trade and Industry Written Evidence


APPENDIX 11

Memorandum by Sir Anthony Cleaver, Chairman, Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA)

INTRODUCTION

  We became fully operational on 1 April 2005. On that date, we took responsibility for the decommissioning and clean up of the UK's civil public sector nuclear sites, previously owned and operated by BNFL, or operated by UKAEA. We also took responsibility for the operational assets on BNFL sites and the existing commercial contracts for Magnox electricity generation, for nuclear fuel manufacture at Springfields and for spent fuel reprocessing and nuclear fuel manufacture at Sellafield. We are required to operate these commercial assets efficiently and effectively and to maximise revenue to offset decommissioning and clean up costs. All relevant BNFL assets and liabilities were transferred to us on 1 April 2005. The Government's intention was that the UKAEA's assets and liabilities would also be transferred to us but it was decided in the interests of the smooth establishment of the NDA to delay the transfer which will now take place in March/April 2007.

OUR REMIT

  In brief, our remit is to ensure that decommissioning and clean up is carried out safely, securely, cost effectively and in ways that protect the environment for this and future generations. Our current estimate of the cost of decommissioning and cleaning up our sites is £55.8bn. Our functions, duties and powers are set out in Part 1 of the Energy Act 2004. These are summarised in Annex A.[26] We operate openly and transparently, protecting only that information which is commercially or personally confidential, or security sensitive. We are required to provide best value to taxpayers, who are funding the decommissioning and clean up programme. The Energy Act places specific responsibilities on us to:

    —  promote competition in the decommissioning and clean up market so that the best available skills can be brought to the task;

    —  promote good practice;

    —  maintain the nuclear skills base and ensure that appropriate skills are available when needed;

    —  carry out research and promulgate the results; and

    —  give encouragement and other support to activities that benefit the social or economic life of communities living near our sites.

  These responsibilities are wide ranging and together with our national, strategic role represent a step change in the way in which the civil nuclear sector has historically approached decommissioning and clean up activities. Prior to the establishment of the NDA, UKAEA had made good progress with the limited funds available to it in dealing with that part of the nuclear legacy for which it was responsible. The advent of the client (NDA)/contractor (UKAEA) arrangement, as foreshadowed in the 2002 Managing the Nuclear Legacy White Paper, has sharpened the focus on delivering accelerated programmes of decommissioning and clean up safely, securely, cost effectively and with proper regard to the environment. We have, therefore, welcomed UKAEA's decision to enter into a strategic alliance with other contractors further cementing this change.

  We believe that good performance in health, safety, security and environmental performance is not only paramount but fundamental to the success of the NDA. Our goals are simple—no accidents, no harm to people and no damage to the environment. Our Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Policy seeks, by a process of continuous improvement, to achieve and maintain excellence in health, safety, security and environmental performance. The delivery of excellence in these areas is crucial to our goal of safe and efficient decommissioning of the UK's legacy sites and to the success of our commercial activities.

  Our Policy applies to everyone involved in supporting the NDA's mission, including our contractors. We are developing health, safety and environmental performance metrics for our contractors and these will be used to drive forward our commitment to deliver improvements in these vitally important areas.

OUR ORGANISATION

  Our HQ is in Cumbria. We have just moved into a new office on the West Lakes Science Park, near Whitehaven. We have four regional offices: one in Abingdon (to cover the Southern sites); one in Risley (to cover the North West and North Wales); one in Cumbria (to cover Sellafield, Calder Hall, Windscale and the Low Level Waste facility at Drigg); and one in Forss (to cover the Scottish sites). We currently have 180 permanent staff in post and expect to reach 230 by summer 2006. We have a very small office in London where I am based.

  The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is our sponsoring Department. DTI bids for our funds from HM Treasury as part of the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) process. As part of the 2004 CSR settlement, we received a budget of approximately £2 billion for each of the three years 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08.

  As part of the 2004 Spending Review, DTI and HM Treasury agreed three PSA targets for the NDA. These were to:

    —  deliver annual efficiency gains from 2006-07;

    —  complete competitions for at least 50% of our sites by the end of 2008; and

    —  reduce our total liabilities by 10% by 2010.

  At present, approximately half of our budget derives from revenue from commercial operations, ie electricity generation, reprocessing spent fuel and fuel manufacture. We have agreed with DTI a set of strict criteria against which to evaluate any new commercial contracts. However, over time and as current contracts are completed and commercial plants close, this revenue will fall and a proportion of it will need to be made up by further grant-in-aid. Future funding will be achieved through the CSR process.

  Later this year and as part of the forthcoming Spending Review, we will be submitting to the DTI our funding requirements for 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11. We have yet to determine what our requirements will be for those three years.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS

  The NDA Board—operating through me—is collectively accountable to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry for all aspects of the NDA's activities and performance. We are also responsible to the Scottish Ministers for certain matters, including activities that affect NDA sites located in Scotland and in relation to certain devolved policy matters, eg radioactive waste. The Chief Executive is responsible for the day-to-day operations and management of the NDA, the performance of the executive management team and is accountable to the Board. The Board comprises executive members and non-executive members with the latter forming a majority.

  The Board meets monthly around the Country with one meeting each year in Scotland, one in Wales, one at Harwell and the remainder divided between Cumbria and London. The Board comprises seven non-executive Directors (including me) and five executive Directors (including Dr Ian Roxburgh, my CEO). The Board is working extremely well and in its first year has had to deal with real challenges such as: the incident at Sellafield reported in April 2005 which shut down the THORP (Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant); agreeing the scope and content of our first Strategy and undertaking a public consultation on it (the Strategy is now with the Government for approval); BNFL's proposed sale of British Nuclear Group (BNG) and the implications for our competition proposals; and safety incidents at Dounreay.

  When considering the make-up of the non-Executive members of the Board we were particularly interested in securing people with a background and expertise in Human Resources, Academia, the Environment, Accountancy, the Commercial Sector and Industrial Relations. I am pleased to say that we achieved our objective.

  The role of the non-executive members is to challenge the executive management; to ensure that the executive team is focused and incentivised to produce positive results; and generally to hold the executive team to account for its performance.

  The NDA Board has established an Audit Committee, chaired by a non-Executive Director, to support it in discharging its responsibilities for issues of risk, control and governance and associated assurance. The Audit Committee advises the Board on:

    —  strategic processes for risk, control and governance and the Statement on Internal Control (SIC);

    —  accounting policies, the Annual Report & Accounts, matters arising from the external audit, and Management's Letter of Representation to the External Auditors;

    —  plans, activities and performance of Internal and External audit;

    —  adequacy of management response to issues identified by audit activity, including the external auditor's management letter;

    —  Board policies, including procurement and any matters relating to assurance on risk management, control or corporate governance;

    —  proposals for tendering for either Internal or External Audit services or for purchase of non-audit services from contractors who provide such services.

  The NDA's Annual Report & Accounts is audited by the National Audit Office and the Energy Act requires the NDA to lay the Annual Report & Accounts before Parliament each year.

  The NDA Board has also established a Remuneration Committee, chaired by a non-Executive Director, to support the Board in determining the remuneration and terms of service for the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Directors. The specific duties of the Committee are:

    —  to determine the remuneration and terms of service for the Executive Directors to ensure that they are fairly rewarded for their individual contribution to the organisation, having proper regard to the organisation's circumstances and performance and to the provisions of any national arrangements for such staff where appropriate. The Board may also decide to extend the Committee's remit to include other senior managers' terms;

    —  to monitor the performance of individual Executive Directors;

    —  to advise on and oversee appropriate contractual arrangements for such staff including the proper calculation and scrutiny of termination payments taking account of such national guidance as is appropriate; and

    —  to advise on the NDA's employment policies and their revision, from time to time, including personnel matters of magnitude.

  We have also established corporate governance arrangements between DTI (our sponsoring department) and the Scottish Executive. Meetings between the NDA's CEO and Executive Directors with the DTI's Head of Energy Industries and Technology Unit, supported by senior officials from the Department's finance function and senior officials from the Scottish Executive, take place at quarterly intervals. These meetings review all aspects of the NDA's activities, including the management of the NDA's budget. Monthly meetings take place at an appropriately senior level between the NDA, DTI and Scottish Executive to review strategic, operational and policy issues. There are also regular senior level meetings between the CEO and senior officials in HM Treasury.

  During our short existence the Board has:

    —  consulted on, had approved by the Government and published our Annual Plan for 2005-06;

    —  had approved by the Government and published our Annual Report & Accounts for 2004-05;

    —  consulted on, revised and submitted to the Government for approval our first Strategy;

    —  consulted on, revised and submitted to the Government our Annual Plan for 2006-07; and

    —  started preparations for the production of our Annual Report & Accounts for 2005-06.

  A copy of our Management Statement & Financial Memorandum is at Annex B.[27]

CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH UKAEA

  The NDA has an initial contract with UKAEA to manage and operate the sites for which UKAEA is the Site License Company (SLC). These are: Dounreay, Windscale, Harwell and Winfrith. It is expected that the NDA will also assume responsibility for the decommissioning and clean-up of the JET (Joint European Torus) fusion facility at Culham when that facility ceases to operate, subject to its designation to the NDA by the Government. Should the Government decide to designate the JET facility to the NDA as expected, then the NDA would hold a competition for the decommissioning of the JET facility.

  The contractual relationship between the NDA and UKAEA is essentially the same as that between the NDA and its other management and operation (M&O) contractors (British Nuclear Group and Westinghouse). Preparations for the transfer of UKAEA's assets and liabilities to the NDA (see remit above) and for the necessary restructuring of the UKAEA, are well underway and are expected to be completed by spring 2007, ie before any of the UKAEA sites are competed.

  These arrangements mean that there is a clear distinction between the respective client and contractor roles of the NDA and UKAEA, both of which are Non Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs). In essence, the NDA determines the national strategic approach to decommissioning and clean up, agrees with its contractors the work to be performed on each site and funds that work. The contract between the NDA and UKAEA defines the scope of work to be performed at each site, the schedule for completing that work and annual site funding limits. Performance Based Incentives (PBIs) are agreed between the NDA and its contractors, including the UKAEA, which provide the basis on which contractors can earn fee (profit) by meeting or exceeding PBIs. At present, contractors can earn up to 4.4% of the annual site funding limit in fee.

  During autumn 2005, the NDA conducted a Portfolio Management exercise to review the performance of each of its sites in terms of progress in achieving agreed work programmes and budget spend. Money was taken away from some sites because of under performance and reallocated to better performing sites. The UKAEA's Harwell, Dounreay and Winfrith sites were all net beneficiaries and are receiving extra funding for the current financial year which has allowed them to bring work forward.

INDUSTRY PENSION ARRANGEMENTS

  The NDA is committed to delivering the pensions protections for the nuclear decommissioning workforce as set out in the Energy Act 2004, Government policy and Ministerial statements. In order to help to deliver those protections, the NDA is developing a new Nuclear Decommissioning Industry Wide Pension Scheme (the new scheme) to look after the needs of staff if, on a future transfer to the private sector, they are unable to remain in their current pension scheme.

  The design and coverage of the new scheme is being informed by a detailed consultation with stakeholders, in particular with the unions representing the workforce and will be subject to final approval by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. A key requirement is that the new scheme will meet the obligations set out in the Energy Act to enable staff transferred for NDA purposes to continue to accrue benefits that are no less favourable than those they already enjoy. We are still considering the process to determine who should run the new scheme.

  There are currently three pension schemes in use by the NDA's contractors, which are, in decreasing order of size of membership:

    —  The UKAEA Combined Pension Scheme (CPS). All of UKAEA's workforce and most of those in the BNFL group are in this unfunded, public sector scheme (c13,500 employees in total). The Industry Wide Pension Scheme is particularly relevant to current CPS members as they cannot remain in the CPS if they transfer to the private sector, for example, as the result of competition for site management or a sale of their employer. The proposed sale of Westinghouse would affect around 1,000 CPS members at the Springfields site. The new scheme is, therefore, being developed to be ready in time for the possible completion of that sale in August 2006.

    —  The Magnox Group of the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme (ESPS). Most of the Magnox workforce (c3,500 employees) belong to this funded pension-trust scheme. The ESPS can accommodate private sector members and it is not expected, therefore, that any current Magnox employees will need to leave the ESPS as a result of site competition or in the event of any a sale of the business. The Magnox ESPS Group is currently in deficit, in common with most other funded trust-based final salary pension schemes. The NDA, Magnox and the Scheme's trustees have agreed a mechanism to repair the deficit involving a series of capital payments by the employer over seven years (the first of which was made in 2005).

    —  The BNFL Group Pension Scheme (GPS). This is used by some parts of the BNFL group (c1,400 employees) and is a funded pension-trust. It can accommodate private sector employees and, like the Magnox Group of the ESPS, currently has a deficit that is being repaired in a similar way.

RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

  The decommissioning and clean up work that is our core remit will generate large quantities of radioactive and non-radioactive waste. Radioactive waste is divided into three main categories—high level waste (HLW), intermediate level waste (ILW) and low level waste (LLW).

  HLW is a liquid waste bi-product of spent fuel reprocessing and is the most dangerous waste on any of our sites. Treating this material and putting into glass blocks and stainless steel containers for interim storage is our overriding radioactive waste priority. There is currently no long term management arrangement for dealing with the (around) 2,000 cubic metres of HLW in the UK.

  ILW arises in solid and liquid forms and is present at most of our sites. It arises from both operational and decommissioning activities. In volume terms, there are around 350,000 cubic metres of ILW, some of which has been packaged for eventual disposal but the majority is still to be retrieved from the facilities in which it is currently held and packaged. As with HLW, there is currently no long term management arrangement for ILW. Packaged ILW is currently kept in interim stores.

  LLW represents by volume the largest proportion of radioactive waste. It is estimated that around 2 million cubic metres of LLW will have been generated by the end of the NDA's decommissioning and clean up programme. This does not include the estimated 20 million cubic metres of contaminated land on the Sellafield site. Most LLW is disposed of in the LLW facility at Drigg. However, it is already clear that the facility at Drigg does not have the capacity needed for all the LLW that will be produced and other facilities will be required.

  Options for the long term management arrangements for HLW and ILW are being considered by CoRWM (Committee on Radioactive Waste Management), the expert group set up by the Government and the Devolved Administrations (DAs). CoRWM is due to present its recommendations to the Government and the DAs in July. A number of storage and disposal options are still being evaluated. The NDA is working closely with CoRWM.

  A particularly important strength that the NDA brings to the whole question of managing radioactive and non-radioactive waste is our ability to look strategically across 20 sites and to identify synergies and opportunities for rationalisation that no one site operator has historically been capable of doing. This has the potential to lead to earlier site clearance and savings in interim storage requirements.

  It is crucially important to the delivery of the Strategy—currently awaiting approval by the Government—that early and firm decisions are reached on the long term management arrangements to be pursued and on the mechanisms for their delivery. We need to have the long term management arrangements for HLW and ILW available by 2030—and ideally much earlier.

STATE AIDS

  In December 2004, the European Commission commenced a State Aid investigation into the commercial operations formerly owned by BNFL and transferred to the NDA on 1 April 2005. The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether the new arrangements distort the European market. The investigation continues.

  Interim funding arrangements, which ensure that no new Government aid will fund these commercial operations during the course of the investigation, were put in place to allow the NDA to deliver decommissioning programmes. The European Commission did not raise any objections to these interim arrangements.

GOVERNMENT'S ENERGY POLICY REVIEW

  The NDA has a very clear remit that does not extend to issues relating to wider energy policy.

  However, due to the high current level of interest in issues surrounding new nuclear build, when we consulted on our Draft Strategy a number of respondents (around 70) made their views known on this issue even though it was not raised in our Draft Strategy. We have passed on these comments to the Energy Policy Review Team in the DTI.

  Though we have no current remit relating to new nuclear build, we stand ready to support any new Government policy in this area as appropriate.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

  We have established Site Stakeholder Groups, independently chaired, for all of our sites to be the main conduit on site specific issues between local stakeholders and the NDA. We have also established a National Stakeholder Group to consider and advise us on national, strategic issues. All these fora have made a good start and we propose to develop these arrangements further over the coming years.


26   Annex A not printed. Back

27   Annex B not printed. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 August 2006