Select Committee on Trade and Industry Written Evidence


APPENDIX 13

Supplementary memorandum by the CBI

  Thank you for the opportunity to express out members' views at the sub-committee hearing on 17 May. We thought you might find it helpful if we were to reiterate the following points which were all touched on to some extent during the sessions which we attended.

  1.  UK exporters are subject to the relevant English Law anti-corruption legislation wherever they operate in the world, irrespective of which Export Credit Agency's support they are employing and indeed, even if they are not employing any Export Credit Agency support at all.

  2.  It is that legislation, not ECGD's procedures, which constitutes the primary deterrent and which provides the most severe sanctions against bribery and corruption by UK exporters. The significance of the legislation is internationally recognised. The OECD Bribery Working Group reviewed the legislation in 2003 and concluded that "UK law now addresses the requirements set forth in the [OECD] Convention".

  3.  Our members' well publicised concerns about ECGD's procedures should not be interpreted as a desire to "water down" ECGD's provisions or to weaken the UK's stance on bribery and corruption. The points at issue have been principally the practicalities of compliance, and the ability of ECGD to manage commercially confidential information. The first issue has we believe been substantially addressed by the recent consultation's Final Response, and the second is the subject of the continuing discussion on ECGD's "Special handling arrangements".

  We hope you find these additional comments to be useful and remain at your disposal to answer any other questions you feel we could usefully address.

26 May 2006


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 25 July 2006