Select Committee on Trade and Industry Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 6

Memorandum by the Department of Trade and Industry

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Department welcomes this inquiry which looks at significant issues that are potentially key to the development and future of the Royal Mail and the Post Office network.

  2.  This Memorandum is intended to provide the Committee with some helpful background and factual information on the proposed financial framework together with the latest position on that and employee incentivisation. We believe that it would also be helpful to reiterate our role as shareholder in the Royal Mail as this sets the backdrop for our approach to these issues.

  3.  We understand that the Department for Work and Pensions has provided the Committee with a Memorandum about the future of the Post Office Card Account.

GOVERNMENT'S ROLE AS SHAREHOLDER

  4.  The Shareholder Executive, located in the Department of Trade and Industry, has responsibility for the Government's shareholding in Royal Mail. The Executive was created in September 2003 with the overarching objective of making Government an effective and well-informed shareholder. Its remit extends to around 25 Government owned businesses with a combined turnover of around £20 billion. Its role is to advise Ministers and officials on a wide range of shareholder issues including objectives, governance, strategy, performance monitoring, Board appointments and remuneration. The Executive draws on the skills of both the private and public sectors to meet its objective.

  5.  The Shareholder Executive directly manages the Government's financial interests in Royal Mail. It takes full account of Government policy (which, of course, includes non-commercial objectives), but within this context, it seeks to use its discretion to act as a commercial shareholder. As set out in the 1999 Post Office Reform White Paper, this is an arm's length relationship to ensure that the management has the commercial freedom to run the business and the Executive does not seek to micro-manage it. The Executive has sought to increase Royal Mail's accountability to its owner and to ensure that the company delivers the shareholder's objectives. These objectives are:

    —    Royal Mail to be a best-in-class, publicly-owned postal service provider with robust, long-term, sustainable business health; and

    —    the delivery of government and other services effectively through an efficient and fit for purpose Post Office branch network which offers maximum access to those who need it.

PROPOSED FINANCE FRAMEWORK

  6.  This is a pivotal moment in the history of the Royal Mail. From 1 January 2006, the postal services market was fully liberalised by the independent regulator, Postcomm. Royal Mail now has to respond to the challenges that a fully open market represents. It has to be efficient and provide the quality of service that customers require so that it can maintain volumes and build on the turnaround that has taken place over the last four years.

  7.  Added to this the company also faces the challenge, as do many private sector companies following adverse stock market and bond conditions, changing actuarial assumptions and new accounting standards, of a very large pension deficit that stands at £5.6 billion. This pension deficit is the largest of any UK corporate.

  8.  In order to succeed under these conditions, the Royal Mail Board decided that it required access to finance to enable it to modernise the business while at the same time seeking to address the pension fund deficit. Royal Mail was asked to submit a business case to justify an investment by the shareholder in the company.

  9.  Following discussions between the shareholder and the company, an agreement in principle was reached on a new finance framework for Royal Mail that gives the company wider freedoms to use its resources and borrowing facilities to modernise and secure its future in the competitive market. It also provides stability for the pension fund and reassurance to those in the Royal Mail pension schemes.

  10.  As the Secretary of State announced in a Parliamentary statement on 18 May, the proposed financial structure includes:

    —    the release of £850 million of the Royal Mail Reserve for the company to transfer into a pension escrow account that may be drawn on by the pension trustees in the unlikely event that the company should fail;

    —    in principle agreement by Government to extend the existing debt facilities such that £900 million is available for use by Royal Mail on commercial terms.

  11.  The detail of the finance framework is still being discussed with Royal Mail and formal documentation has not been put in place. The shareholder's overriding objective in these discussions has been to ensure that the arrangements put in place are commercially based. During the period while the company is being transformed, the Government does not expect to receive a dividend but it does expect to receive a return on its investment through an increase in the value of the company. It is not the Government's intention to provide access to finance on un-commercial terms that could be construed to be illegal state aid and distort the newly liberalised market, and have received professional advice to that effect.

  12.  Once the loan facilities are in place, the management of Royal Mail will be able to access them as they see fit to carry out its transformation of the business through the investment in new machinery and to meet other restructuring costs. Royal Mail will also have access to funds generated through its business activities to invest in the company. The price control agreed with Postcomm allows for £1.2 billion to be invested by company in modernisation over the next four years.

  13.  In his statement, the Secretary of State also said that level of support for the post office network, beyond the Social Network payments of £150 million per annum until 2008, depended on decisions taken on the future of the network which the Government will consult on. This remains the position.

  14.  A copy of the Secretary of State's statement is attached at Annex 1 for ease of reference. *[25]

EMPLOYEE SHARE SCHEME

  15.  As set out in its manifesto, the Government have no plans to privatise the Royal Mail.

  16.  The shareholder's position on an Employee Share Scheme remains unchanged since Barry Gardiner, then DTI Minister for Competitiveness, appeared before the Committee last November. He said then that "Royal Mail is not for sale" and that the Government would only consider an employee share scheme where the shares were held in trust and could not be traded on the open market. Within this context, the shareholder was prepared to listen to the company's ideas for such a scheme. The shareholder continues to believe that it is important for the workforce to be appropriately incentivised during this period of change in the company.

  17.  Since Barry Gardiner gave evidence to the Committee, the shareholder has received a proposal from the Royal Mail Board for an employee share scheme. We are carefully considering this proposal that involves the establishment of a trust and would not permit shares to be sold on the open market. No decision has, however, been taken to proceed with such a scheme. The Government has not set a timetable for its deliberations as we wish to carefully weigh up the pros and cons of such a scheme, taking views from a number of stakeholders, and to reach a decision that would be in the best interests of the shareholder, the tax payer, the company and its employees.

POST OFFICE CARD ACCOUNT

  18.  Decisions on the future of the Post Office Card Account are matters for the Department of Work and Pension and we understand that the DWP is submitting a separate Memorandum on this to the Committee. We are currently considering with Post Office Limited the impact of the ending of the POCA in 2010 and this will be a factor in any decisions taken on the future of the post office network.

3 July 2006





25   *Not printed, see HC Deb Col 65WS (18 May 2006). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 14 December 2006