Select Committee on Trade and Industry Written Evidence


Annex D

Royal Mail Pension Plan (RMPP), Actuarial Valuation and funding position, 2000 to 2003

  POSSS was renamed as Section A and B and POPS was renamed as Section C when both were merged into the Royal Mail Pension Plan (RMPP) on 31 March 2000. The sections were run as separate schemes under the plan because of the different funding levels then experienced (POSSS in surplus, POPS in deficit).

  From 31 March 2003 both schemes were in deficit positions and as a result were fully integrated and operated as a single pension plan.

  The table below is an extract from the formal report of the Actuarial Valuation as at 31 March 2003. The aim is to show in percentage terms the reason for the movement in the on-going funding level from March 2000 to March 2003. The main reasons are:

  The contribution holiday from Section A/B accounted for -3.6% change, offset by a 1.1% change from contributions into section C. The net effect of this change is therefore 2.5%. Based upon consistent assumptions as used in March 2000, the plan would have been in surplus (102% funding level) at March 2003

  By 2003 however, the real experience of falling equities had run counter to the assumptions underlying the 2000 valuation—an experience that has been common to all pension funds. The result was 7.8% fall in the position of the fund.

  In addition the March 2003 Actuarial Valuation used different assumptions from the 2000 Valuation to take account of the true experience between 2000-03. This change in assumptions accounted for a further -11.6% change in the funding level.


Funding Level RMPP
%

Funding level as at 31 March 2000
104.5
Expected factors affecting funding level
Section A/B contribution holiday
(3.6)
Section C deficiency contributions
1.1
Funding level as at 31 March 2003 on 2000 basis—expected
102.0
Investment market experience
(6.6)
Other unexpected factors
(1.2)
Funding level as at 31 March 2003 on 2000 basis—actual
94.2
Changes to assumptions
     Inflation reduction from 3% to 2.5% pa
(0.7)
     Strengthening of mortality assumptions
(2.9)
     Changes in other demographic assumptions
(0.2)
     Strengthening of financial assumptions
(7.8)
     Funding level as at 31 March 2003 on 2003 basis
82.6


  * * *



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 7 February 2006